Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 12, 1228013(2025)

Analysis of Solar Diffuser BRDF Characteristics and Their Effect on On-Board Calibration

Zhiyuan Zhang1,2, Hongyao Chen2、*, Wenxin Huang2, Xiaolong Si2, Shiwei Bao2, and Xiaobing Zheng2
Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui , China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Relative geometric relationship between incident vector and reflected vector
    BRDF absolute measurement facility
    Surface scattering characteristic of the solar diffuser
    Test sample
    BRDF of a perfect Lambertian surface at any incident angle
    Solar diffuser BRDF at different incident zenith angles (radial direction is θr, with a range of 45° to 70° and an interval of 15°)
    Solar diffuser BRDF for different incident zenith angles and reflected azimuth angles at the same reflected zenith angle
    Relationship between the measurement uncertainty of reflected signals and energy level
    Test sample after 100 h of irradiation and sample that have not undergone irradiation
    Decay result of the solar diffuser with different angles after 100 h irradiation
    Relative solar diffuser BRDF at different incident zenith angles
    • Table 1. Measurement uncertainty (k=2) of the solar diffuser BRDF

      View table

      Table 1. Measurement uncertainty (k=2) of the solar diffuser BRDF

      Spectral band /nmRelative uncertainty (k=2) /%
      350‒4101.04
      410‒4800.60
      480‒10000.43
      1000‒24000.86
    • Table 2. Measurement plan of the solar diffuser (the text in parentheses indicates the angular interval)

      View table

      Table 2. Measurement plan of the solar diffuser (the text in parentheses indicates the angular interval)

      Incident zenith angle /(°)Incident azimuth angle /(°)Reflected zenith angle /(°)Reflected azimuth angle /(°)Wavelength /nm
      0‒25 (5)015‒75 (5)60‒300 (60)650
      30‒40 (5)60‒300 (30)
      45‒55 (5)60‒300 (15)
      60‒75 (5)60‒300 (10)
    • Table 3. Rise in solar diffuser BRDF measurement uncertainty for each 1% decrease in BRDF at different incident zenith angles

      View table

      Table 3. Rise in solar diffuser BRDF measurement uncertainty for each 1% decrease in BRDF at different incident zenith angles

      Incident zenith angle /(°)Measurement uncertainty increases /%
      00.00145
      200.00145
      450.00204
      650.00351
      750.00577
    • Table 4. Effect of placement errors on the accuracy of on-board calibrations at different incident zenith angles

      View table

      Table 4. Effect of placement errors on the accuracy of on-board calibrations at different incident zenith angles

      Incident zenith angle /(°)BRDF relative change /%
      θi+0.2°θi-0.2°θr+0.2°θr-0.2°φ+0.2°
      00.0630.0630.0440.0440
      200.1230.1210.0140.0142.39×10-5
      450.2760.3040.0430.0730.016
      650.7020.6910.1620.1618.17×10-5
      751.0020.9830.2480.2462.30×10-5
    • Table 5. Influence of the on-board calibration angle design on the calibration accuracy

      View table

      Table 5. Influence of the on-board calibration angle design on the calibration accuracy

      FactorRelative uncertainty /%
      Reasonable designUnreasonable design
      Total3.494.60
      SD BRDF measurement1.001.12
      SD cosine error of incidence0.540.54
      SD radiance non-uniformity0.90.9
      Earth-sun distance correction factor0.20.2
      SD stability monitor0.860.86
      Attenuation varies with observation angle0.82.9
      Measurement of SDH factor before launch0.50.5
      Solar spectral irradiance11
      SD BRDF variation due to the placement error0.11.0
      Stray light2.722.72
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zhiyuan Zhang, Hongyao Chen, Wenxin Huang, Xiaolong Si, Shiwei Bao, Xiaobing Zheng. Analysis of Solar Diffuser BRDF Characteristics and Their Effect on On-Board Calibration[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(12): 1228013

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Feb. 5, 2025

    Accepted: Mar. 10, 2025

    Published Online: Jun. 23, 2025

    The Author Email: Hongyao Chen (hychen@aiofm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS250565

    CSTR:32393.14.AOS250565

    Topics