Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 44, Issue 6, 0601010(2024)

Comparison and Optimization of Ground-Level NO2 Concentration Estimation in China Based on TROPOMI and OMI

Wenyuan Zhou1, Kai Qin1、*, Qin He1, Luyao Wang2, Jinhong Luo3, and Wolong Xie3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 2Xi'an Institute for Innovative Earth Environment Research, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
  • 3Shanxi Academy of Eco-Environmental Planning and Technology, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Flow chart of ground-level NO2 concentration estimation
    Influence of ground station distribution on estimation results. (a) Geographic position of ground stations; (b) estimation of model with latitude and longitude coordinate features; (c) estimation of model with spherical coordinate features; (d) estimation of model without sample geographic information features
    Analysis of influence of predictive variables on model. (a) Variance inflation factor (VIF) from each feature of estimation model; (b) absolute mean about SHAP value of each feature from OMI dataset; (c) Beeswarm image from SHAP value of each feature in OMI dataset
    Spatio-temporal coverage of satellite data. (a) Spatial distribution of tropospheric NO2 data coverage by OMI; (b) spatial distribution of tropospheric NO2 data coverage by TROPOMI; (c) daily coverage of data about TROPOMI and OMI from 2018 to 2021
    Scatter plot of cross-validation from ground-level NO2 estimation by TROPOMI and OMI datasets from 2018 to 2021. (a) Scatter plot of estimation from TROPOMI; (b) scatter plot of estimation from OMI
    Comparison and analysis of spatial resolution of TROPOMI and OMI data. (a) Satellite image of Southeast China from Google Earth; (b) L2 orbit data of TROPOMI; (c) L2 orbit data of OMI; (d) ground-based data; (e) estimation of TROPOMI; (f) estimation of OMI; (g) satellite image of central China from Google Earth; (h) L2 orbit data of TROPOMI; (i) L2 orbit data of OMI; (j) ground-based data; (k) estimation of TROPOMI; (l) estimation of OMI
    Comparison of scatter plots between previous and optimized models from 2018 to 2021. (a) Estimation of optimized model; (b) estimation of previous model
    Comparison of optimization results of high-value models. June 5, 2019: (a) estimation of previous model around Yangtze River Delta; (b) estimation of optimized models; (c) ground-based data; August 8, 2019: (d) estimation results of original model in area around Pearl River Delta; (e) estimation of optimized models; (f) ground-based data
    • Table 1. Comparison of estimated results of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of estimated results of different algorithms

      AlgorithmMAERMSER2Operation time /min
      XGBoost3.906.160.8215
      RF4.426.850.7757
      GBDT4.036.310.8054
    • Table 2. Results of classification from TROPOMI dataset in 2019

      View table

      Table 2. Results of classification from TROPOMI dataset in 2019

      Results of estimationPrecisionRecallFSample size
      01.001.001.00171764
      10.940.940.9413116
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Wenyuan Zhou, Kai Qin, Qin He, Luyao Wang, Jinhong Luo, Wolong Xie. Comparison and Optimization of Ground-Level NO2 Concentration Estimation in China Based on TROPOMI and OMI[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(6): 0601010

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics

    Received: May. 18, 2023

    Accepted: Jul. 21, 2023

    Published Online: Feb. 29, 2024

    The Author Email: Kai Qin (qinkai@cumt.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS231013

    CSTR:32393.14.AOS231013

    Topics