High Power Laser and Particle Beams, Volume. 35, Issue 3, 035005(2023)

Deposited energy optimization analysis of discharge in water based on Kriging model

Jinglin Zhao, Zhiqiang Wang*, Jinjun Wang, Dongdong Zhang, and Guofeng Li
Author Affiliations
  • College of Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning Dalian 116024
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Schematic diagram of underwater high-voltage pulse discharge experiment system
    Typical voltage and current waveform of high voltage pulse discharge in water
    Plasma channel development process
    Results of deposited energy calculation
    Flowchart of the optimization search analysis
    Spatial distribution of the 20 initial sample points
    Cross-validation of the computational process
    Variation of root mean square error with the number of additions
    Multi-peak characteristics of deposited energy
    Global optimization search flow chart
    Comparison between experimental results and optimal deposited energy
    • Table 1. Experimental variables and their scope

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Experimental variables and their scope

      voltage/kVelectrode spacing/mmconductivity/(mS·cm−1)
      13−172−50.2−0.8
    • Table 2. Some of the initial sample points after inverse normalization and the corresponding experimental results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Some of the initial sample points after inverse normalization and the corresponding experimental results

      voltage/kVconductivity/(mS·cm−1) electrode spacing/mmdeposited energy/J
      14.10.264.5340.46
      13.40.774.3726.00
      16.20.332.1662.3
      15.10.454.6846.87
      15.70.642.3251.81
      14.50.522.0041.74
      13.80.392.7940.09
      16.80.552.9559.76
    • Table 3. After the normalization of some of the new points and the corresponding experimental results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. After the normalization of some of the new points and the corresponding experimental results

      voltage/kVconductivity/(mS·cm−1) electrode spacing/mmdeposited energy/J
      170.3312.2867.41
      170.425266.78
      170.22.0466.51
      170.83.565.6
      170.652.1966.93
    • Table 4. Effect of electrode spacing variation on deposited energy at different conductivities

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Effect of electrode spacing variation on deposited energy at different conductivities

      conductivity/(mS·cm−1) spacing variation Δd/mm deposited energy variation/J
      0.2417.59
      0.445.04
      0.648.96
      0.8413.56
      1411.4
    • Table 5. Global optimal solution of the model

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Global optimal solution of the model

      voltage/kVconductivity/(mS·cm−1) electrode spacing/mmoptimal deposited energy/J
      170.82.2868.73
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jinglin Zhao, Zhiqiang Wang, Jinjun Wang, Dongdong Zhang, Guofeng Li. Deposited energy optimization analysis of discharge in water based on Kriging model[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35(3): 035005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Pulsed Power Technology

    Received: Aug. 5, 2022

    Accepted: Oct. 14, 2022

    Published Online: Mar. 9, 2023

    The Author Email: Wang Zhiqiang (wangzq@dlut.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202335.220240

    Topics