Localization phenomena due to random potential, namely the Anderson localization (AL), is at the heart position in modern condensed matter physics.[
Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 10, (2020)
Hidden Anderson localization in disorder-free Ising–Kondo lattice
Anderson localization (AL) phenomena usually exist in systems with random potential. However, disorder-free quantum many-body systems with local conservation can also exhibit AL or even many-body localization transition. We show that the AL phase exists in a modified Kondo lattice without external random potential. The density of state, inverse participation ratio and temperature-dependent resistance are computed by classical Monte Carlo simulation, which uncovers an AL phase from the previously studied Fermi liquid and Mott insulator regimes. The occurrence of AL roots from quenched disorder formed by conservative localized moments. Interestingly, a many-body wavefunction is found, which captures elements in all three paramagnetic phases and is used to compute their quantum entanglement. In light of these findings, we expect that the disorder-free AL phenomena can exist in generic translation-invariant quantum many-body systems.
1. Introduction
Localization phenomena due to random potential, namely the Anderson localization (AL), is at the heart position in modern condensed matter physics.[
Recently, we have revisited a modified Kondo lattice model, namely the Ising–Kondo lattice (IKL),[
Figure 1.
In this paper, we explore the possibility of accessing AL in the IKL model on square lattice. To simplify the discussion and to meet our previous work, here we focus on the half-filling case though doping the half-filled system does not involve any technical difficulty (an example on a doped system is given in Appendix D). By inspecting density of state (DOS), inverse participation ratio (IPR) and temperature-dependent resistance, we will show that the AL phase emerges in intermediate coupling regime between metallic FL and insulating MI above antiferromagnetic critical temperature (see Fig. 1). The occurrence of AL results from quenched disorder, formed by the conservative localized moments at each site. Interestingly, we find a many-body wavefunction, which captures elements in all three paramagnetic phases and is used to compute their entanglement entropy. In light of these findings, the disorder-free AL phenomena could exist in more generic translation-invariant quantum many-body systems.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the IKL model is introduced and explained. In Section 3, MC simulation is performed and observables such as DOS, IPR and temperature-dependent resistance are computed. Analysis on MC data suggests the appearance of AL in intermediate coupling regime where thermal fluctuation destroys magnetic long-ranged order. A wavefunction is constructed and the entanglement entropy is evaluated. Section 4 gives a summary and a brief discussion on AL in generic quantum many-body systems.
2. Model
The IKL model on square lattice at half-filling is defined as follows:[
In Ref. [17], we have observed that f-electron’s spin/localized moment at each site is conservative since
A careful reader may note that isotropic Kondo lattice with ferromagnetic coupling has been studied by classical MC simulation.[
3. Results
In terms of MC, we have determined the finite temperature phase diagram in Fig. 1. In addition to well-established FL, MI and NAI in previous work, interestingly we find an AL phase in intermediate coupling regime at high T. There is no transition but crossover from FL to AL and AL to MI. Since the former three phases have been clearly studied,[
To characterize the AL phase from FL or MI, we study the DOS, IPR and temperature-dependent resistance of conduction electrons.[
The IPR measures tendency of localization. Here the energy/frequency-dependent IPR is used,
The temperature-dependent resistance is related to static conductance σdc as ρ = 1 / σdc, which reads
Now, from MC calculation of these quantities, e.g., Figs. 2–4, we find an AL phase in intermediate coupling, beside well-established FL and MI at high T regime. In Fig. 2, AL has finite N(0) though its strength is heavily suppressed and looks like a pseudogap. The reason is that due to the preformed local antiferromagnetic order, the band gap begins to form at low T. When increasing temperature, excitation of localized moments appears and it acts like impurity scattering center in the well-formed antiferromagnetic background. Then, the conduction electron scatters from such impurity and contributes impurity bound state, which fills in the band gap.[
Figure 2.Density of state (DOS) of conduction electron
Figure 3.Inverse participation ratio (IPR) of conduction electron IPR(
Figure 4.Temperature-dependent resistance of conduction electron
In Fig. 3, we note that IPR of FL satisfies the expected inverse-volume law while AL and MI have saturated IPR around ω = 0. Additionally, extrapolation of IPR at ω = 0 into infinite system size indicates that the localization length in FL is infinite while AL and MI only have finite localization length.
The T-dependent resistance of conduction electron is shown in Fig. 4, and the crossover from FL to AL and MI is clearly demonstrated. In both AL and MI, the insulating behaviors appear before the formation of insulating NAI (T > Tc), suggesting that they are insulators driven by correlation and thermal fluctuation.
3.1. Why AL appears
As found by MC simulation, the AL phase appears in intermediate coupling regime above the magnetic long-ranged ordered state. If T is high enough, the effective Boltzmann weight ρ(q) for given configuration of static potential/Ising spin should be equal. Thus, c-fermion feels an effective potential, which works as binary random potential (recall that qj = ±1 has two values). Averaging over ρ(q) leads to a disorder average for c-fermion and the AL phase is realized.
Technically, the above statement means that
To justify the above argument, we show DOS and IPR in Fig. 5 using Eq. (6), where both DOS and IPR agree with ones in AL phase in Figs. 2(b) and 3(b) in intermediate coupling regime (J / t = 8). Thus, it is suggested again that AL phase in our model results from effective random potential formed by localized moment. As a matter of fact, if we consider weak and strong coupling case, their DOS and IPR will be similar to the counterpart in Figs. 2 and 3 as well, thus all three states at high-T are stable in the T = ∞ limit.
Figure 5.The DOS and IPR for
3.2. A many-body wavefunction for all three paramagnetic states
Motivated by arguments in the last subsection and Eq. (6), we write down the following many-body state, which approximates FL, AL and MI,
3.3. Quenched disorder
In the context of AL, both quenched disorder and annealed disorder are static disorder. In literature, the difference between these two kinds of disorder is that, by definition, quenched disorder corresponds to a time-independent probability distribution function (PDF)[
In our model, the quenched disorder means that the configuration of local moments is randomly chosen at every site, where P(qi) cannot fluctuate in time. We have realized the quenched disorder at the infinite temperature (T = ∞) situation. A quenched disordered many-body wavefunction is constructed with Nm randomly chosen configurations of local moments. Here each P(qi) is the same and time-independent, thus leads to a global constant-type P({q1,q2,…,qNs}) as well. Under this constant-type PDF, the many-body wavefunction could be regarded as quenched disordered state.[
As mentioned above, with this many-body wavefunction we can cover the main results of MC simulation at high temperature. It suggests that the quenched disordered state do capture the main physics of IKL in the high temperature region. Therefore, it is reasonable to attribute the existence of disorder-free AL to the intrinsic quenched disorder of local moments.
3.4. Entanglement entropy
The entanglement entropy SEE is used to characterize the universal quantum correlation in many-body state. For our model, we calculate SEE for each slater determinant state |ψ〉 in the given Ising configuration {qj} as follows.[
We consider the open boundary condition and use |ψ〉 to compute the equal-time correlation function
Figure 6.The entanglement entropy
Firstly, SEE decreases monotonically from small-J to large-J regime, agreeing with the increased localization tendency. Another interesting feature is that when J / t ≃ 12, SEE / Lc collapses into a single line, thus indicating a crossover from AL to MI at T = ∞. More close inspection on SEE shows a linear-dependence on Lc in the MI regime, which is the well-known area-law for SEE.[
4. Discussion and conclusion
In conclusion, we have established an AL phase in a modified Kondo lattice model without external disorder potential. The presence of AL results from quenched disorder, formed by conservative localized moment at each site and is a stable phase even at infinite temperature. A many-body wavefunction is constructed to understand AL, FL and MI. Their entanglement entropy is computed and the area law is violated in FL. In light of these findings, we recall that the interacting many-electron system can be rewritten as free electrons moving on fluctuated background field after the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation.[
Appendix A: MC simulation
With MC simulation, we can write the partition function as
To calculate physical quantities, we consider generic operator
For
Appendix B: Correlation function and spectral function
When we calculate fermion’s correlation function like
For calculating dynamic quantities like conductance, (imaginary) time-dependent correlation function such as
Appendix C: Static conductance and resistance
The dc conductance is related to current–current correlation function as
Appendix D: Example for doped system at T = ∞
Here, we show the entanglement entropy
Using Eq. (
Figure 6.The entanglement entropy
Appendix E: Finite IPR at finite T
At zero temperature, due to the absence of eigenstates in the gap of Mott insulator, the IPR at Fermi surface should be strictly equal to zero. However, at finite temperature situation, the physics of excited states also contributes to the IKL system, leading to finite DOS (see Fig.
Figure 6.The entanglement entropy
Figure 6.The entanglement entropy
[1] P W Anderson. Phys. Rev. B, 109, 1492(1958).
[2] P A Lee, T V Ramakrishnan. Rev. Mod. Phys., 57, 287(1985).
[3] F Evers, A D Mirlin. Rev. Mod. Phys., 80, 1355(2008).
[4] I V Gornyi, A D Mirlin, D G Polyakov. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95(2005).
[5] D M Basko, I L Aleiner, B L Altshuler. Ann. Phys., 321, 1126(2006).
[6] R Nandkishore, D A Huse. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., 6, 15(2015).
[7] D A Abanin, E Altman, I Bloch, M Serbyn. Rev. Mod. Phys., 91(2019).
[8] A E Antipov, Y Javanmard, P Ribeiro, S Kirchner. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(2016).
[9] M Gonçalves, P Ribeiro, R Mondaini, E V Castro. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(2019).
[10] A Smith, J Knolle, D L Kovrizhin, R Moessner. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(2017).
[11] A Smith, J Knolle, R Moessner, D L Kovrizhin. Phys. Rev. B, 97(2018).
[12] M Srednicki. Phys. Rev. E, 50, 888(1994).
[13] M Rigol, V Dunjko, M Olshanii. Nature, 452, 854(2008).
[14] J B Kogut. Rev. Mod. Phys., 51, 659(1979).
[15] A Smith, J Knolle, R Moessner, D L Kovrizhin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(2017).
[16] A E Sikkema, W J L Buyers, I Affleck, J Gan. Phys. Rev. B, 54, 9322(1996).
[17] W W Yang, J Z Zhao, H G Luo, Y Zhong. Phys. Rev. B, 100(2019).
[18] S R White, D J Scalapino. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 1272(1998).
[19] J W Lynn, S Skanthakumar, Q Huang, S K Sinha, Z Hossain, L C Gupta, R Nagarajan, C Godart. Phys. Rev. B, 55, 6584(1997).
[20] L M Falicov, J C Kimball. Phys. Rev. Lett., 22, 997(1969).
[21] J A Mydosh, P M Oppeneer. Rev. Mod. Phys., 83, 1301(2011).
[22] P Coleman. Introduction to Many Body Physics, 486-580(2015).
[23] Q Si, S Paschen. Phys. Stat. Solid. B, 250, 425(2013).
[24] P Coleman, A H Nevidomskyy. J. Low Temp. Phys., 161, 182(2010).
[25] A Kitaev. Ann. Phys., 303, 2(2003).
[26] A Kitaev. Ann. Phys., 321, 2(2006).
[27] M M Maska, K Czajka. Phys. Rev. B, 74(2006).
[28] S Yunoki, J Hu, A L Malvezzi, A Moreo, N Furukawa, E Dagotto. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 845(1998).
[29] E Dagotto, S Yunoki, A L Malvezzi, A Moreo, J Hu, S Capponi, D Poilblanc, N Furukawa. Phys. Rev. B, 58, 6414(1998).
[30] M Žonda, J Okamoto, M Thoss. Phys. Rev. B, 100(2019).
[31] A N Malmi-Kakkada, O T Valls, C Dasgupta. Phys. Rev. B, 90(2014).
[32] K Binder, A P Young. Rev. Mod. Phys., 58, 801(1986).
[33] M T Tran. Phys. Rev. B, 76(2007).
[34] K Byczuk, W Hofstetter, D Vollhardt. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 24, 1727(2010).
[35] M Dzero, K Sun, P Coleman, V Galitski. Phys. Rev. B, 85(2012).
[36] J Eisert, M Cramer, M B Plenio. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82, 277(2010).
[37] M M Wolf. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96(2006).
[38] D Gioev, I Klich. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96(2006).
[39] J Hubbard. Phys. Rev. Lett., 3, 77(1959).
[40] R L Stratonovich. Sov. Phys.-Dokl., 2, 416(1957).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Wei-Wei Yang, Lan Zhang, Xue-Ming Guo, Yin Zhong. Hidden Anderson localization in disorder-free Ising–Kondo lattice[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(10):
Received: Feb. 10, 2020
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 21, 2021
The Author Email: Yin Zhong (zhongy@lzu.edu.cn)