Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 59, Issue 12, 1228006(2022)

High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image Change Detection Based on Improved DeepLabv3+

Zhenliang Chang1、*, Xiaogang Yang1, Ruitao Lu1, and Hao Zhuang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Missile Engineering, Rocket Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710025, Shaanxi , China
  • 2The 32023 Unit of the People’s Liberation Army, Dalian 116085, Liaoning , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(19)
    Network structure of DeepLabv3+ basic model
    Model structure of improved DeepLabv3+
    Hollow convolution of fusion of different receptive fields. (a) Channel stitching; (b) sampling point distribution of r=12 convolutional layer in original feature map; (c) sampling point distribution of r=12 convolutional layer in r=6 feature map
    Optimization of intermediate flow structure of backbone network
    Structure of channel attention module
    Part of training samples
    Basic structure of deep convolutional generative confrontation network
    Changes in different scenarios and time periods. (a) Scene 1; (b) scene 2
    Accuracy curve and loss curve of DeepLabv3+ network. (a) Accuracy curve; (b) loss curve
    Accuracy curve and loss curve of improved DeepLabv3+ network. (a) Accuracy curve; (b) loss curve
    Change detection results of DeepLabv3+ (left) and improved DeepLabv3+ (right). (a) Scene 1; (b) scene 2
    Landsat 8 test images. (a) Scene 3; (b) scene 4
    DeepLabv3+ (left) and improved DeepLabv3+ (right) detection results. (a) Scene 3; (b) scene 4
    Part of images of OSCD dataset. (a) Scene 5; (b) scene 6
    DeepLabv3+ (left) and improved DeepLabv3+ (right) change detection results. (a) Scene 5; (b) scene 6
    • Table 1. Effect of fusion of different receptive fields on convolution of holes

      View table

      Table 1. Effect of fusion of different receptive fields on convolution of holes

      Expansion rate rEffective operation elementReceptive fieldInformation utilization
      69135.33
      129251.44
      189370.66
      12+649373.58
      18+1281612.18
    • Table 2. Comparison of change detection results of different methods

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of change detection results of different methods

      Evaluation index(EI)Improved DeepLabv3+DeepLabv3+Literature[11Literature[12Literature[13
      Kappa coefficient(Kappa)0.750.640.580.190.35
      Overall accuracy(OA)95.1%93.6%92.8%95.1%87.7
      Omission rate(OR)4.6%5.2%3.4%78.1%5.0%
      Error rate(ER)5.6%18.0%21.2%2.5%37.2%
      Sensitivity(SS)94.4%81.2%68.6%21.8%65.9%
      Specificity(SP)95.2%94.9%94.0%97.4%94.2%
      Balance accuracy(BA)94.8%88.1%81.3%59.6%80.1%
      F1-score(F1)77.8%69.7%70.1%21.5%64.3%
      Time required /s12.7112.6516.061.100.26
    • Table 3. Change detection results of deep convolution method based on Landsat 8 data

      View table

      Table 3. Change detection results of deep convolution method based on Landsat 8 data

      Evaluation index(EI)KappaOA%OR%ER%SP%BA%FI%
      DeepLabv3+0.4195.748.63.196.974.143.1
      Improved DeepLabv3+0.5696.420.03.196.888.457.7
    • Table 4. Comparison of depth change detection results based on OSCD data

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of depth change detection results based on OSCD data

      Evaluation index(EI)KappaOA%OR%ER%SP%BA%FI%
      DeepLabv3+0.3975.28.735.583.776.839.0
      Improved DeepLabv3+0.4483.65.327.289.180.344.8
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zhenliang Chang, Xiaogang Yang, Ruitao Lu, Hao Zhuang. High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image Change Detection Based on Improved DeepLabv3+[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(12): 1228006

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Jun. 22, 2021

    Accepted: Aug. 31, 2021

    Published Online: Jun. 6, 2022

    The Author Email: Zhenliang Chang (wnsh63@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP202259.1228006

    Topics