Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 44, Issue 6, 0601003(2024)
Underwater Ghost Imaging Based on Speckle Degradation Compensation
[1] Shapiro J H, Boyd R W. The physics of ghost imaging[J]. Quantum Information Processing, 11, 949-993(2012).
[2] Moreau P A, Toninelli E, Gregory T et al. Ghost imaging using optical correlations[J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 12, 1700143(2018).
[3] Han S S, Yu H, Shen X A et al. A review of ghost imaging via sparsity constraints[J]. Applied Sciences, 8, 1379(2018).
[4] Yang M C, Wu Y, Feng G Y. Research progress on underwater ghost imaging[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 42, 1701003(2022).
[5] Gong W L, Han S S. Correlated imaging in scattering media[J]. Optics Letters, 36, 394-396(2011).
[6] Le M N, Wang G, Zheng H B et al. Underwater computational ghost imaging[J]. Optics Express, 25, 22859-22868(2017).
[7] Zhang Q W, Li W D, Liu K et al. Effect of oceanic turbulence on the visibility of underwater ghost imaging[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 36, 397-402(2019).
[8] Wu Y B, Yang Z H, Tang Z L. Experimental study on anti-disturbance ability of underwater ghost imaging[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 58, 1011031(2021).
[9] Chen Q, Mathai A, Xu X P et al. A study into the effects of factors influencing an underwater, single-pixel imaging system’s performance[J]. Photonics, 6, 123(2019).
[10] Wu H D, Zhao M, Li F Q et al. Underwater polarization-based single pixel imaging[J]. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 28, 157-163(2020).
[11] Yang X, Liu Y, Mou X Y et al. Imaging in turbid water based on a Hadamard single-pixel imaging system[J]. Optics Express, 29, 12010-12023(2021).
[12] Wu H, Zhao G P, He C H et al. Sub-Nyquist underwater denoising ghost imaging with a Coiflet-wavelet-order-based Hadamard matrix[J]. Physical Review A, 106, 053522(2022).
[13] Bina M, Magatti D, Molteni M et al. Backscattering differential ghost imaging in turbid media[J]. Physical Review Letters, 110, 083901(2013).
[14] Li Y Z, Deng C J, Gong W L et al. Polarization difference ghost imaging in turbid medium[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 41, 1511004(2021).
[15] Wang T, Chen M Y, Wu H et al. Underwater compressive computational ghost imaging with wavelet enhancement[J]. Applied Optics, 60, 6950-6957(2021).
[16] Li M D, Mathai A, Lau S L H et al. Underwater object detection and reconstruction based on active single-pixel imaging and super-resolution convolutional neural network[J]. Sensors, 21, 313(2021).
[17] Yang X, Yu Z Y, Xu L et al. Underwater ghost imaging based on generative adversarial networks with high imaging quality[J]. Optics Express, 29, 28388-28405(2021).
[18] Sahu S K, Shanmugam P. Semi-analytical modeling and parameterization of particulates-in-water phase function for forward angles[J]. Optics Express, 23, 22291-22307(2015).
[19] Wells W H. Loss of resolution in water as a result of multiple small-angle scattering[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 59, 686-691(1969).
[20] Gong W L. High-resolution pseudo-inverse ghost imaging[J]. Photonics Research, 3, 234-237(2015).
[21] Zhang C, Guo S X, Cao J S et al. Object reconstitution using pseudo-inverse for ghost imaging[J]. Optics Express, 22, 30063-30073(2014).
[22] Luo C L, Li Z L, Xu J H et al. Computational ghost imaging and ghost diffraction in turbulent ocean[J]. Laser Physics Letters, 15, 125205(2018).
[23] Luo C L, Wan W X, Chen S Y et al. High-quality underwater computational ghost imaging with shaped Lorentz sources[J]. Laser Physics Letters, 17, 105209(2020).
[24] Zhang Y, Li W D, Wu H Z et al. High-visibility underwater ghost imaging in low illumination[J]. Optics Communications, 441, 45-48(2019).
[25] Zhang Q W, Cao L Z, Liu X et al. Imaging analysis of reflective ghost imaging in oceanic turbulence[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 49, 0901002(2020).
[26] Hou W L, Gray D J, Weidemann A D et al. Comparison and validation of point spread models for imaging in natural waters[J]. Optics Express, 16, 9958-9965(2008).
[27] Duntley S Q. Underwater lighting by submerged lasers and incandescent sources, instituition of oceanography[D](1971).
[28] Voss K J. Simple empirical model of the oceanic point spread function[J]. Applied Optics, 30, 2647-2651(1991).
[29] Jaffe J S. Monte Carlo modeling of underwater-image formation: validity of the linear and small-angle approximations[J]. Applied Optics, 34, 5413-5421(1995).
[30] Petzold T J. Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters[R], 72-78(1972).
[31] Guo J C, Li C Y, Guo C L et al. Research progress of underwater image enhancement and restoration methods[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 22, 273-287(2017).
[32] Chen Y Z, Xia M, Li W et al. Comparison of point spread models for underwater image restoration[J]. Optik, 123, 753-757(2012).
[33] Fan F, Yang K C, Fu B et al. Application of blind deconvolution approach with image quality metric in underwater image restoration[C], 236-239(2010).
[34] Fan F, Yang K C, Xia M et al. Comparative study on several blind deconvolution algorithms applied to underwater image restoration[J]. Optical Review, 17, 123-129(2010).
[35] Zhang J L, Zhang Q H, He G M. Blind deconvolution: multiplicative iterative algorithm[J]. Optics Letters, 33, 25-27(2007).
[36] Lane R G. Blind deconvolution of speckle images[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 9, 1508-1514(1992).
[37] Cheng C Y, Sung C C, Chang H H. Underwater image restoration by red-dark channel prior and point spread function deconvolution[C], 110-115(2016).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yuliang Li, Jinquan Qi, Mingliang Chen, Chenjin Deng, Xuehui Shao, Bangyi Tao, Shensheng Han. Underwater Ghost Imaging Based on Speckle Degradation Compensation[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(6): 0601003
Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics
Received: Apr. 19, 2023
Accepted: May. 31, 2023
Published Online: Mar. 15, 2024
The Author Email: Chen Mingliang (cml2008@siom.ac.cn)
CSTR:32393.14.AOS230849