[1] Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?[J]. Physical Review, 47, 777-780(1935).

[2] DiVincenzo D P. Quantum computation[J]. Science, 270, 255-261(1995).

[3] Gottesman D, Chuang I L. Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations[J]. Nature, 402, 390-393(1999).

[4] Lloyd S, Braunstein S L. Quantum computation over continuous variables[J]. Physical Review Letters, 82, 1784-1787(1999).

[5] Menicucci N C, van Loock P, Gu M L et al. Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 97, 110501(2006).

[6] Ukai R, Iwata N, Shimokawa Y et al. Demonstration of unconditional one-way quantum computations for continuous variables[J]. Physical Review Letters, 106, 240504(2011).

[7] Ukai R, Yokoyama S, Yoshikawa J I et al. Demonstration of a controlled-phase gate for continuous-variable one-way quantum computation[J]. Physical Review Letters, 107, 250501(2011).

[8] Zhang J, Braunstein S L. Continuous-variable Gaussian analog of cluster states[J]. Physical Review A, 73, 032318(2006).

[9] Furusawa A, Sørensen J L, Braunstein S L et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation[J]. Science, 282, 706-709(1998).

[10] Huo M R, Qin J L, Cheng J L et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation through fiber channels[J]. Science Advances, 4, eaas9401(2018).

[11] Pirandola S, Eisert J, Weedbrook C et al. Advances in quantum teleportation[J]. Nature Photonics, 9, 641-652(2015).

[12] Ren J G, Xu P, Yong H L et al. Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation[J]. Nature, 549, 70-73(2017).

[13] Yin J, Li Y H, Liao S K et al. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres[J]. Nature, 582, 501-505(2020).

[14] Roos C F, Chwalla M, Kim K et al. ‘Designer atoms’ for quantum metrology[J]. Nature, 443, 316-319(2006).

[15] Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, Maccone L. Advances in quantum metrology[J]. Nature Photonics, 5, 222-229(2011).

[16] Guo X S, Breum C R, Borregaard J et al. Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network[J]. Nature Physics, 16, 281-284(2020).

[17] Xia Y, Agrawal A R, Pluchar C M et al. Entanglement-enhanced optomechanical sensing[J]. Nature Photonics, 17, 470-477(2023).

[18] Zhuang Q T, Zhang Z S, Shapiro J H. Distributed quantum sensing using continuous-variable multipartite entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 97, 032329(2018).

[19] Tian B X, Hou Z B, Xiang G Y. Enhancing minimum-consumption discrimination of two-qubit quantum states via entangling measurements (invited)[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 61, 0327001(2024).

[20] Wang B, Zhang L J. Research progress of optical quantum precision measurement (invited)[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 51, 0112001(2024).

[21] Wehner S, Elkouss D, Hanson R. Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead[J]. Science, 362, eaam9288(2018).

[22] Kimble H J. The quantum internet[J]. Nature, 453, 1023-1030(2008).

[23] Fabre C, Treps N. Modes and states in quantum optics[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 92, 035005(2020).

[24] Zhong H S, Li Y, Li W et al. 12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion[J]. Physical Review Letters, 121, 250505(2018).

[25] Wang X L, Luo Y H, Huang H L et al. 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom[J]. Physical Review Letters, 120, 260502(2018).

[26] Su X L, Tan A H, Jia X J et al. Experimental preparation of quadripartite cluster and Greenberger‒Horne‒Zeilinger entangled states for continuous variables[J]. Physical Review Letters, 98, 070502(2007).

[27] Lu Y, Zhang S N, Zhang K et al. Global entangling gates on arbitrary ion qubits[J]. Nature, 572, 363-367(2019).

[28] Pezzè L, Gabbrielli M, Lepori L et al. Multipartite entanglement in topological quantum phases[J]. Physical Review Letters, 119, 250401(2017).

[29] Wu Y L, Bao W S, Cao S R et al. Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor[J]. Physical Review Letters, 127, 180501(2021).

[30] Yoshikawa J I, Yokoyama S, Kaji T et al. Invited article: generation of one-million-mode continuous-variable cluster state by unlimited time-domain multiplexing[J]. APL Photonics, 1, 060801(2016).

[31] Takeda S, Mizuta T, Fuwa M et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation of photonic quantum bits by a hybrid technique[J]. Nature, 500, 315-318(2013).

[32] Andersen U L, Neergaard-Nielsen J S, van Loock P et al. Hybrid discrete-and continuous-variable quantum information[J]. Nature Physics, 11, 713-719(2015).

[33] Morin O, Huang K, Liu J L et al. Remote creation of hybrid entanglement between particle-like and wave-like optical qubits[J]. Nature Photonics, 8, 570-574(2014).

[34] Ren S Y, Wang Y, Su X L. Hybrid quantum key distribution network[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 65, 200502(2022).

[35] Konno S, Asavanant W, Hanamura F et al. Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light[J]. Science, 383, 289-293(2024).

[36] Liu S H, Han D M, Wang N et al. Experimental demonstration of remotely creating Wigner negativity via quantum steering[J]. Physical Review Letters, 128, 200401(2022).

[37] Wang M H, Zhang M, Qin Z Z et al. Experimental preparation and manipulation of squeezed cat states via an all-optical in-line squeezer[J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 16, 2200336(2022).

[38] Han D M, Sun F X, Wang N et al. Remote preparation of optical cat states based on Gaussian entanglement[J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 17, 2300103(2023).

[39] Zhang D, Cai Y, Zheng Z et al. Non-Gaussian nature and entanglement of spontaneous parametric nondegenerate triple-photon generation[J]. Physical Review A, 103, 013704(2021).

[40] Glauber R J. Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field[J]. Physical Review, 131, 2766-2788(1963).

[41] Reid M D, Walls D F. Generation of squeezed states via degenerate four-wave mixing[J]. Physical Review A, 31, 1622-1635(1985).

[42] Reid M D, Walls D F, Dalton B J. Squeezing of quantum fluctuations via atomic coherence effects[J]. Physical Review Letters, 55, 1288-1290(1985).

[43] Stoler D. Equivalence classes of minimum uncertainty packets[J]. Physical Review D, 1, 3217-3219(1970).

[44] Duan L M, Giedke G, Cirac J I et al. Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems[J]. Physical Review Letters, 84, 2722-2725(2000).

[45] Simon R. Peres-horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems[J]. Physical Review Letters, 84, 2726-2729(2000).

[46] Wiseman H M, Jones S J, Doherty A C. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen paradox[J]. Physical Review Letters, 98, 140402(2007).

[47] Cavalcanti E G, Jones S J, Wiseman H M et al. Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen paradox[J]. Physical Review A, 80, 032112(2009).

[48] van Loock P, Furusawa A. Detecting genuine multipartite continuous-variable entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 67, 052315(2003).

[49] Slusher R E, Hollberg L W, Yurke B et al. Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity[J]. Physical Review Letters, 55, 2409-2412(1985).

[50] Shelby R M, Levenson M D, Perlmutter S H et al. Broad-band parametric deamplification of quantum noise in an optical fiber[J]. Physical Review Letters, 57, 691-694(1986).

[51] Wu L A, Kimble H J, Hall J L et al. Generation of squeezed states by parametric down conversion[J]. Physical Review Letters, 57, 2520-2523(1986).

[52] Machida S, Yamamoto Y, Itaya Y. Observation of amplitude squeezing in a constant-current-driven semiconductor laser[J]. Physical Review Letters, 58, 1000-1003(1987).

[53] Ou Z Y, Pereira S F, Kimble H J et al. Realization of the Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen paradox for continuous variables[J]. Physical Review Letters, 68, 3663-3666(1992).

[54] Takeno Y, Yukawa M, Yonezawa H et al. Observation of -9 dB quadrature squeezing with improvement of phase stability in homodyne measurement[J]. Optics Express, 15, 4321-4327(2007).

[55] Mehmet M, Ast S, Eberle T et al. Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 dB[J]. Optics Express, 19, 25763-25772(2011).

[56] Ast S, Mehmet M, Schnabel R. High-bandwidth squeezed light at 1550 nm from a compact monolithic PPKTP cavity[J]. Optics Express, 21, 13572-13579(2013).

[57] Vahlbruch H, Mehmet M, Danzmann K et al. Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency[J]. Physical Review Letters, 117, 110801(2016).

[58] Yang W H, Shi S P, Wang Y J et al. Detection of stably bright squeezed light with the quantum noise reduction of 12.6 dB by mutually compensating the phase fluctuations[J]. Optics Letters, 42, 4553-4556(2017).

[59] Lassen M, Leuchs G, Andersen U L. Continuous variable entanglement and squeezing of orbital angular momentum states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 102, 163602(2009).

[60] Bowen W P, Schnabel R, Bachor H A et al. Polarization squeezing of continuous variable Stokes parameters[J]. Physical Review Letters, 88, 093601(2002).

[61] Shi S P, Tian L, Wang Y J et al. Demonstration of channel multiplexing quantum communication exploiting entangled sideband modes[J]. Physical Review Letters, 125, 070502(2020).

[62] Paris M G A, Cola M, Bonifacio R. Remote state preparation and teleportation in phase space[J]. Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, 5, S360-S364(2003).

[63] Han D M, Wang N, Wang M H et al. Remote preparation and manipulation of squeezed light[J]. Optics Letters, 47, 3295-3298(2022).

[64] Su X L, Han D M, Wang N et al. Advances in entanglement-based remote state preparation (invited)[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 61, 0127001(2024).

[65] Reid M D. Demonstration of the Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification[J]. Physical Review A, 40, 913-923(1989).

[66] Boyer V, Marino A M, Pooser R C et al. Entangled images from four-wave mixing[J]. Science, 321, 544-547(2008).

[67] Silberhorn C, Lam P K, Weiss O et al. Generation of continuous variable Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen entanglement via the Kerr nonlinearity in an optical fiber[J]. Physical Review Letters, 86, 4267-4270(2001).

[68] Gessner M, Pezzè L, Smerzi A. Efficient entanglement criteria for discrete, continuous, and hybrid variables[J]. Physical Review A, 94, 020101(2016).

[69] Bowen W P, Schnabel R, Lam P K et al. Experimental investigation of criteria for continuous variable entanglement[J]. Physical Review Letters, 90, 043601(2003).

[70] Qin Z Z, Gessner M, Ren Z H et al. Characterizing the multipartite continuous-variable entanglement structure from squeezing coefficients and the Fisher information[J]. NPJ Quantum Information, 5, 3(2019).

[71] Aoki T, Takei N, Yonezawa H et al. Experimental creation of a fully inseparable tripartite continuous-variable state[J]. Physical Review Letters, 91, 080404(2003).

[72] Jing J T, Zhang J, Yan Y et al. Experimental demonstration of tripartite entanglement and controlled dense coding for continuous variables[J]. Physical Review Letters, 90, 167903(2003).

[73] Su X L, Zhao Y P, Hao S H et al. Experimental preparation of eight-partite cluster state for photonic qumodes[J]. Optics Letters, 37, 5178-5180(2012).

[74] Armstrong S, Morizur J F, Janousek J et al. Programmable multimode quantum networks[J]. Nature Communications, 3, 1026(2012).

[75] Yokoyama S, Ukai R, Armstrong S C et al. Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain[J]. Nature Photonics, 7, 982-986(2013).

[76] Larsen M V, Guo X S, Breum C R et al. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state[J]. Science, 366, 369-372(2019).

[77] Asavanant W, Shiozawa Y, Yokoyama S et al. Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state[J]. Science, 366, 373-376(2019).

[78] Madsen L S, Laudenbach F, Askarani M F et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor[J]. Nature, 606, 75-81(2022).

[79] Chen M R, Menicucci N C, Pfister O. Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb[J]. Physical Review Letters, 112, 120505(2014).

[80] Roslund J, de Araújo R M, Jiang S F et al. Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs[J]. Nature Photonics, 8, 109-112(2014).

[81] Cai Y, Roslund J, Ferrini G et al. Multimode entanglement in reconfigurable graph states using optical frequency combs[J]. Nature Communications, 8, 15645(2017).

[82] Larsen M V, Guo X S, Breum C R et al. Fiber-coupled EPR-state generation using a single temporally multiplexed squeezed light source[J]. NPJ Quantum Information, 5, 46(2019).

[83] Yang Z J, Jahanbozorgi M, Jeong D et al. A squeezed quantum microcomb on a chip[J]. Nature Communications, 12, 4781(2021).

[84] Wu B H, Alexander R N, Liu S et al. Quantum computing with multidimensional continuous-variable cluster states in a scalable photonic platform[J]. Physical Review Research, 2, 023138(2020).

[85] Zhou Y F, Wang W, Song T T et al. Ultra-large-scale deterministic entanglement containing 2×20 400 optical modes based on time-delayed quantum interferometer[J]. Physical Review Letters, 130, 060801(2023).

[86] Braunstein S L, van Loock P. Quantum information with continuous variables[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 513-577(2005).

[87] Corzo N V, Marino A M, Jones K M et al. Noiseless optical amplifier operating on hundreds of spatial modes[J]. Physical Review Letters, 109, 043602(2012).

[88] Liu K, Guo J, Cai C X et al. Experimental generation of continuous-variable hyperentanglement in an optical parametric oscillator[J]. Physical Review Letters, 113, 170501(2014).

[89] Guo H, Liu N, Li Z et al. Generation of continuous-variable high-dimensional entanglement with three degrees of freedom and multiplexing quantum dense coding[J]. Photonics Research, 10, 2828-2835(2022).

[90] Pan X Z, Yu S, Zhou Y F et al. Orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed continuous-variable entanglement from four-wave mixing in hot atomic vapor[J]. Physical Review Letters, 123, 070506(2019).

[91] Wang W, Zhang K, Jing J T. Large-scale quantum network over 66 orbital angular momentum optical modes[J]. Physical Review Letters, 125, 140501(2020).

[92] Cai Y, Feng J L, Wang H L et al. Quantum-network generation based on four-wave mixing[J]. Physical Review A, 91, 013843(2015).

[93] Liu Y, Cai Y, Xiang Y et al. Tripartite Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen steering with linear and nonlinear beamsplitters in four-wave mixing of rubidium atoms[J]. Optics Express, 27, 33070-33079(2019).

[94] Cai Y, Hao L, Zhang D et al. Multimode entanglement generation with dual-pumped four-wave-mixing of rubidium atoms[J]. Optics Express, 28, 25278-25292(2020).

[95] Xiang Y, Liu Y, Cai Y et al. Monogamy relations within quadripartite Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen steering based on cascaded four-wave mixing processes[J]. Physical Review A, 101, 053834(2020).

[96] Liu Y, Cai Y, Luo B S et al. Collective multipartite Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen steering via cascaded four-wave mixing of rubidium atoms[J]. Physical Review A, 104, 033704(2021).

[97] Liu Y L, Wei J J, Niu M Q et al. Atomic-coherence-assisted multipartite entanglement generation with dressing-energy-level-cascaded four-wave mixing[J]. Physical Review A, 106, 043709(2022).

[98] Qin Z Z, Cao L M, Wang H L et al. Experimental generation of multiple quantum correlated beams from hot rubidium vapor[J]. Physical Review Letters, 113, 023602(2014).

[99] Zhang K, Wang W, Liu S S et al. Reconfigurable hexapartite entanglement by spatially multiplexed four-wave mixing processes[J]. Physical Review Letters, 124, 090501(2020).

[100] Pysher M, Miwa Y, Shahrokhshahi R et al. Parallel generation of quadripartite cluster entanglement in the optical frequency comb[J]. Physical Review Letters, 107, 030505(2011).

[101] Arzani F, Fabre C, Treps N. Versatile engineering of multimode squeezed states by optimizing the pump spectral profile in spontaneous parametric down-conversion[J]. Physical Review A, 97, 033808(2018).

[102] Cai Y, Xiang Y, Liu Y et al. Versatile multipartite Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen steering via a quantum frequency comb[J]. Physical Review Research, 2, 032046(2020).

[103] Zhong H S, Wang H, Deng Y H et al. Quantum computational advantage using photons[J]. Science, 370, 1460-1463(2020).

[104] Zhong H S, Deng Y H, Qin J et al. Phase-programmable Gaussian Boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light[J]. Physical Review Letters, 127, 180502(2021).

[105] Larsen M V, Guo X S, Breum C R et al. Deterministic multi-mode gates on a scalable photonic quantum computing platform[J]. Nature Physics, 17, 1018-1023(2021).

[106] Zhang M, Kang H J, Wang M H et al. Quantifying quantum coherence of optical cat states[J]. Photonics Research, 9, 887-892(2021).

[107] Armstrong S, Wang M, Teh R Y et al. Multipartite Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen steering and genuine tripartite entanglement with optical networks[J]. Nature Physics, 11, 167-172(2015).

[108] Qu R, Wang Y L, An M et al. Retrieving high-dimensional quantum steering from a noisy environment with N measurement settings[J]. Physical Review Letters, 128, 240402(2022).

[109] He Q Y, Rosales-Zárate L, Adesso G et al. Secure continuous variable teleportation and Einstein‒Podolsky‒Rosen steering[J]. Physical Review Letters, 115, 180502(2015).

[110] Zuo X J, Yan Z H, Feng Y N et al. Quantum interferometer combining squeezing and parametric amplification[J]. Physical Review Letters, 124, 173602(2020).

[111] Ma Y Q, Miao H X, Pang B H et al. Proposal for gravitational-wave detection beyond the standard quantum limit through EPR entanglement[J]. Nature Physics, 13, 776-780(2017).

[112] Abbott B P, Abbott R, Abbott T D et al. GW150914: the advanced LIGO detectors in the era of first discoveries[J]. Physical Review Letters, 116, 131103(2016).

[113] Wu S H, Bao G Z, Guo J X et al. Quantum magnetic gradiometer with entangled twin light beams[J]. Science Advances, 9, eadg1760(2023).

[114] Wolfgramm F, Cerè A, Beduini F A et al. Squeezed-light optical magnetometry[J]. Physical Review Letters, 105, 053601(2010).

[115] Li B B, Bílek J, Hoff U B et al. Quantum-enhanced optomechanical magnetometry[J]. Optica, 5, 850-856(2018).

[116] Xia Y, Li W, Clark W et al. Demonstration of a reconfigurable entangled radio-frequency photonic sensor network[J]. Physical Review Letters, 124, 150502(2020).

[117] Cai Y, Roslund J, Thiel V et al. Quantum enhanced measurement of an optical frequency comb[J]. NPJ Quantum Information, 7, 82(2021).

[118] Ma L X, Lei X, Yan J L et al. High-performance cavity-enhanced quantum memory with warm atomic cell[J]. Nature Communications, 13, 2368(2022).

[119] Yan Z H, Wu L, Jia X J et al. Establishing and storing of deterministic quantum entanglement among three distant atomic ensembles[J]. Nature Communications, 8, 718(2017).

[120] Appel J, Figueroa E, Korystov D et al. Quantum memory for squeezed light[J]. Physical Review Letters, 100, 093602(2008).