[4] [4] AMULYA G, ALI BAIG MOGHAL A, ALMAJED A. A state-of-the-art review on suitability of granite dust as a sustainable additive for geotechnical applications[J]. Crystals, 2021, 11(12): 1526.

[5] [5] SAKA M B, HASHIM M H B M. Critical assessment of the effectiveness of different dust control measures in a granite quarry[J]. Journal of Public Health Policy, 2024, 45(2): 212-233.

[8] [8] HUANG M Y, BAO S X, ZHANG Y M, et al. The combined effects of calcium oxide and phosphate on burnt coal cinder-based cementitious materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 362: 129720.

[10] [10] JI Z H, PEI Y S. Bibliographic and visualized analysis of geopolymer research and its application in heavy metal immobilization: a review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 231: 256-267.

[11] [11] LIU X M, LIU E P. The synergistic mechanism and stability evaluation of phosphogypsum and recycled fine powder-based multi-source solid waste geopolymer[J]. Polymers, 2023, 15(12): 2696.

[12] [12] LI L, WEI Y J, LI Z L, et al. Rheological and viscoelastic characterizations of fly ash/slag/silica fume-based geopolymer[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 354: 131629.

[13] [13] TURKANE S D, CHOUKSEY S K. Application of response surface method for optimization of stabilizer dosages in soil stabilization[J]. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2021, 7(1): 106.

[14] [14] LUO X, XU J Y, LI W M. Response surface design of solid waste based geopolymer[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(2): 1598-1604.

[15] [15] SILVA L C, DOS REIS FERREIRA R A, DE CASTRO MOTTA L A, et al. Optimization of metakaolin-based geopolymer composite using sisal fibers, response surface methodology, and canonical analysis[J]. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 2019, 6(4): 32-44.

[16] [16] PEREZ J V D, NADRES E T, NGUYEN H N, et al. Response surface methodology as a powerful tool to optimize the synthesis of polymer-based graphene oxide nanocomposites for simultaneous removal of cationic and anionic heavy metal contaminants[J]. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(30): 18480-18490.

[17] [17] MOHAMMED B S, HARUNA S, MUBARAK BN ABDUL WAHAB M, et al. Optimization and characterization of cast in situ alkali-activated pastes by response surface methodology[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 225: 776-787.

[18] [18] DE OLIVEIRA L G, DE PAIVA A P, BALESTRASSI P P, et al. Response surface methodology for advanced manufacturing technology optimization: theoretical fundamentals, practical guidelines, and survey literature review[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 104(5): 1785-1837.

[19] [19] ZHENG Z, MA X, ZHANG Z H, et al. In-situ transition of amorphous gels to Na-P1 zeolite in geopolymer: mechanical and adsorption properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 202: 851-860.

[25] [25] MA Z M, DAN H C, TAN J W, et al. Optimization design of MK-GGBS based geopolymer repairing mortar based on response surface methodology[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(5): 1889.

[27] [27] GUO X L, SHI H S, LIN M S, et al. Effects of calcium contents in class C fly ash geopolymer[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 687: 508-513.

[29] [29] LEE W K W, VAN DEVENTER J S J. The effects of inorganic salt contamination on the strength and durability of geopolymers[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2002, 211(2/3): 115-126.

[30] [30] NATH S K. Geopolymerization behavior of ferrochrome slag and fly ash blends[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 181: 487-494.

[31] [31] NATH S K, KUMAR S. Role of particle fineness on engineering properties and microstructure of fly ash derived geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 233: 117294.