Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 60, Issue 23, 2312004(2023)
An Allocation Method of Laser Damage Test Point Based on Nonlinear Fitting
[1] Li F Q, Han W, Wang F et al. Research status of final optics assembly in high-power laser facility[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 50, 060002(2013).
[2] Wu Q, Fan Z W, Yu J et al. Research progress of nanosecond regime pulsed fiber lasers[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 49, 060004(2012).
[3] Zhao Y A, Shao J D, Liu X F et al. Tracking and understanding laser damage events in optics[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 34, 011004(2022).
[5] Arenberg J W. Accuracy and precision of laser damage measurements made via binary search techniques[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2714, 80-89(1996).
[6] Schrameyer S, Jupé M, Jensen L et al. Algorithm for cumulative damage probability calculations in S-on-1 laser damage testing[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 8885, 88851J(2013).
[7] Arenberg J W, Thomas M D. Improving laser damage threshold measurements: an explosive analogy[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 8530, 85301L(2012).
[8] Xu J Q, Su J H, Ge J M et al. Measurement uncertainty of laser-induced damage threshold of the optical thin films[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 46, 0806007(2017).
[9] Arenberg J W. Direct comparision of the damage frequency method and binary search technique[J]. Optical Engineering, 51, 121819(2012).
[10] Zorila A, Stratan A, Nemes G. Comparing the ISO-recommended and the cumulative data-reduction algorithms in S-on-1 laser damage test by a reverse approach method[J]. The Review of Scientific Instruments, 89, 013104(2018).
[11] Bataviciute G, Grigas P, Smalakys L et al. Revision of laser-induced damage threshold evaluation from damage probability data[J]. The Review of Scientific Instruments, 84, 045108(2013).
[12] Arenberg J W, Thomas M D. Benefits from a change in the fitting function in the damage frequency method[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 5991, 599127(2005).
[13] Melninkaitis A, Bataviciute G, Sirutkaitis V. Numerical analysis of laser-induced damage threshold search algorithms and their uncertainty[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 7504, 75041D(2009).
[14] Krol H, Gallais L, Grèzes-Besset C et al. Investigation of nanoprecursors threshold distribution in laser-damage testing[J]. Optics Communications, 256, 184-189(2005).
[15] Carr C W, Bude J D, DeMange P. Laser-supported solid-state absorption fronts in silica[J]. Physical Review B, 82, 184304(2010).
[16] Porteus J O, Seitel S C. Absolute onset of optical surface damage using distributed defect ensembles[J]. Applied Optics, 23, 3796-3805(1984).
[17] Arenberg J W. Calculation of uncertainty in laser-damage thresholds determined by use of the damage-frequency method[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 7504, 75041D(1994).
[18] Hildenbrand A, Wagner F R, Akhouayri H et al. Accurate metrology for laser damage measurements in nonlinear crystals[J]. Optical Engineering, 47, 083603(2008).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Jiawei Zhou, Wang Cheng, Chenxuan Yin, Guangyan Guo, Lifen Liao, Hong Zhang, Yi Li, Qiangqiang Zhu, Le Wang, Yunfeng Ma. An Allocation Method of Laser Damage Test Point Based on Nonlinear Fitting[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(23): 2312004
Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology
Received: Oct. 24, 2022
Accepted: Feb. 8, 2023
Published Online: Dec. 4, 2023
The Author Email: Le Wang (calla@cjlu.edu.cn), Yunfeng Ma (mayf100612@aircas.ac.cn)