Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 51, Issue 2, 0213002(2024)

Sensing Characteristics with High Figure-of-Merit Based on MoS2 Thin Film Coupled Waveguide

Ying Chen, Jiankun Wang, Zhixin Ding*, Meijie Li, Meng Zhao, and Guoting Zhao
Author Affiliations
  • Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Test/Measurement Technology and Instrument, School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Schematic diagram of composite structure model
    Spectral response curves of PWG1, PWG2 and the overall structure. (a) Spectral response curve of the structure in the presence of PWG1 only; (b) spectral response curve of the structure in the presence of PWG2 only; (c) spectral response curve of the whole structure in the presence of both waveguides
    Internal electromagnetic field distributions of PWG1, PWG2 and the overall structure. (a) Electromagnetic field distribution of PWG1 at θ=43.07°; (b) electromagnetic field distribution of PWG2 at θ=40.42°; (c) electromagnetic field distribution of the whole structure at θ=40.4°; (d) electromagnetic field distribution of PWG1 at θ=40.42°
    Influence of d2 and d4 on spectral curve. (a) Influence of d2 on resonance Ⅱ; (b) influence of d2 on resonance depth; (c) influence of d4 on resonance FRⅠ
    Influence of d1 and d3 and on Fano characteristics. (a) Influence of d1 on spectral curve; (b) influence of d3 on FRⅠ; (c) influence of d3 on FOM value
    Influence of MoS2 layer n on Fano characteristics. (a) Influence of n on spectral curve; (b) influence of n on FRⅠ; (c) influence of n on FOM value
    GWO-DELM model flowchart
    Comparison chart of real and predicted FOM values and iterative optimization comparison chart. (a) Comparison between the real value and the predicted value; (b) iterative optimization comparison chart
    Residual histogram and fitting curve of each optimization algorithm
    Spectral response before and after structural parameters optimization and sensing performance analysis. (a) Spectral response before and after structural parameters optimization; (b) influence of ns on Fano resonance curve; (c) fitting curve between ns and resonance angle θ
    • Table 1. Sensing property comparison of the sensors prepared with MoS2 and graphene

      View table

      Table 1. Sensing property comparison of the sensors prepared with MoS2 and graphene

      MaterialFOM
      MoS21.2×104
      Graphene7×103
    • Table 2. Error comparison of different optimization algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Error comparison of different optimization algorithms

      Optimization algorithmXMAEXRMSEXMAPE /%
      CS-DELM2.31483.483610.3849
      BA-DELM1.98372.37997.4655
      WOA-DELM1.25972.13277.1958
      GWO-DELM0.98360.99372.9837
    • Table 3. Sensing property comparison between the designed and similar structures

      View table

      Table 3. Sensing property comparison between the designed and similar structures

      StructureNumber of Fano peaksFOMRef.
      Waveguide-coupled surface plasmon resonance sensor structureOne37.65
      Double waveguides with grapheneOne93406
      MIM waveguide with H-type cavityOne1259.222
      Photonic crystal slot nanobeam cavityOne55323
      Square-cavity-coupled straight waveguideTwo554224
      This workOne50000
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ying Chen, Jiankun Wang, Zhixin Ding, Meijie Li, Meng Zhao, Guoting Zhao. Sensing Characteristics with High Figure-of-Merit Based on MoS2 Thin Film Coupled Waveguide[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(2): 0213002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: micro and nano optics

    Received: May. 10, 2023

    Accepted: Jun. 15, 2023

    Published Online: Jan. 4, 2024

    The Author Email: Ding Zhixin (863163322@qq.com)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL230821

    CSTR:32183.14.CJL230821

    Topics