Research Progress in Isotope Gas Detection Techniques Based on Mass Spectrometry and Spectral Analysis

Ziyi Xu; Shuo Liu

doi:10.3788/LOP231848

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 13, 1300003(2024)

Research Progress in Isotope Gas Detection Techniques Based on Mass Spectrometry and Spectral Analysis

Ziyi Xu and Shuo Liu^*

Advanced Laser Technology Research Center, School of Electronic Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(9)

Fig. 1. IRMS basic structure

Download full size

Fig. 2. PAS basic schematic (dashed arrows indicate electrical signals, solid arrows indicate optical signals)

Download full size

Fig. 3. TDLAS system schematic (dashed arrows indicate electrical signals, solid arrows indicate optical signals)

Download full size

Fig. 4. CRDS optical cavity schematic

Download full size

Fig. 5. ICOS basic schematic (dashed arrows indicate electrical signals, solid arrows indicate optical signals)

Download full size

Table 1. Summary of research on isotope gas detection based on PAS technology

View table

Table 1. Summary of research on isotope gas detection based on PAS technology

Reference	Detection technology	Test target	Application scenario	Performance
［25］	QEPAS	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$	Medical testing	2.6 mW low power
［26］	QEPAS	$δ^{13} C H_{4}$	Oil exploration	Size： 30 cm×10 cm×20 cm
［27］	PAS	$δ^{13} C H_{4}$	Medical testing	Size： 40 cm×40 cm×25 cm
［28］	Cantilever beam enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy	$δ^{14} C O_{2}$	In-situ radiocarbon testing	10^-10 CO₂ ultra-low concentration
［29］	QEPAS-linear regression iterative analysis	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$ $δ^{13} C H_{4}$	Oil exploration	Three-component gas detection
［30］	QEPAS	$δ^{13} C H_{4}$	‒	2×10^-4‒2×10^-1 CH₄ high concentration
［31］	PAS	$δ^{13} C H_{4}$ ， $δ^{13} C_{2} H_{6}$	Climate research， oil exploration	Standard deviation： 6.04×10^-4 and 2.8×10^-5

Table 2. Comparison of isotope gas detection sensitivity based on CEAS technology

View table

Table 2. Comparison of isotope gas detection sensitivity based on CEAS technology

Reference	Detection technology	Test target	Application	Average sensitivity /（g/ml）
［70］	CEAS-Kalman filtering	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$ ， $δ^{13} C H_{4}$	Industrial production	1.05×10^-3 and 2.85×10^-3
［71］	CEAS	$δ^{13} C H_{4}$	Environmental monitoring	8×10^-5
［72］	IBBCEAS	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$	Medical noninvasive diagnostics	1.91×10^-4
［73］	CEAS	$δ {H_{2}}^{18} O$ ， $δ^{2} H_{2} O$	Environmental monitoring	4.3×10^-4 and 3.6×10^-3
［74］	CEAS Raman multi-gas sensing	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$	Ecosystem metabolism	10^-6
［75］	CEAMLAS- Fabry-Perot cavity	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$	‒	5.2×10^-9
［76］	TDLAS-CEAS	$δ^{13} C H_{4}$	Environmental monitoring	±5×10^-4

Table 3. Comparison of the sensitivity of isotope gas detection studies based on the ICOS technique

View table

Table 3. Comparison of the sensitivity of isotope gas detection studies based on the ICOS technique

Reference	Detection technology	Test target	Application	Average sensitivity /（g/ml）
［77］	ICOS	$δ^{15} N_{2} O$ ， $δ {N_{2}}^{18} O$ ， $δ {N_{2}}^{17} O$	Environmental monitoring	±4×10^-4， ±9×10^-4， and ±9×10^-4
［78］	WM-OA-ICOS	$δ^{13} C O_{2}$ ， $δ C^{18} O_{2}$	Ecological research	1.7×10^-4 and 2×10^-4

Table 4. Characteristics of isotope gas detection technology

View table

Table 4. Characteristics of isotope gas detection technology

Detection technology	Accurate	Stability	Size	Cost	Operation
Mass spectrometry	Excellent	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor
PAS	Good	Poor	Good	Good	Good
TDLAS	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good
CRDS	Excellent	Fair	Good	Poor	Poor
CEAS/ICOS	Excellent	Fair	Good	Poor	Poor

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Ziyi Xu, Shuo Liu. Research Progress in Isotope Gas Detection Techniques Based on Mass Spectrometry and Spectral Analysis[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(13): 1300003

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Reviews

Received: Aug. 4, 2023

Accepted: Sep. 18, 2023

Published Online: Jul. 17, 2024

The Author Email: Shuo Liu (liushuo@hebut.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3788/LOP231848

CSTR:32186.14.LOP231848

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology