Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 17, Issue 2, 73(2022)

Numerical simulation of JBC flow based on GEKO model

Hui XU1,2, Takanori HINO3, and Zuogang CHEN1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 2School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3Faculty of Engineering, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan
  • show less
    References(18)

    [1] [1] MENTER F R. Best practice: generalized kω twoequation turbulence model in ANSYS CFD (GEKO). version 1.00[R]. Technical Rept ANSYS, 2019.

    [2] [2] HINO T, HIRATA N, OHASHI K, et al. Hull fm design flow measurements of a bulk carrier with an energysaving device f CFD validations[C]Proceedings of PRADS2016. Copenhagen, Denmark: DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2016.

    [3] [3] HINO T, STERN F, LARSSON L, et al. Numerical ship hydrodynamics: an assessment of the Tokyo 2015 Wkshop[M]. Cham: Springer, 2021.

    [4] [4] SUN T, YIN C H, WAN D C. Numerical prediction of JBC resistance in calm water[C]Proceedings of the 26th International Ocean Polar Engineering Conference. Rhodes, Greece: International Society of Offshe Polar Engineers, 2016.

    [5] [5] LIDTKE A, LAKSHMYNARAYANANA A P, CAMILLERI J, et al. RANS computations of flow around a bulk carrier with energy saving device[C]Tokyo 2015: A Wkshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics. Tokyo, Japan, 2015.

    [6] [6] SCHUILING B, WINDT J, RIJPKEMA D, et al. Computational study on power reduction by a preduct f a bulk carrier[C]Tokyo 2015: A Wkshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics. Tokyo, Japan, 2015.

    [7] [7] KKMAZ K B. CFD predictions of resistance propulsion f the JAPAN bulk carrier (JBC) with without an energy saving device[D]. Chalmers: Chalmers University of Technology, 2015.

    [8] [8] BENSOW R E, VAN DEN BOOGAARD M. Using a PANS simulation approach f the transient flow around the Japan Bulk Carrier[C]Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Hamburg, Germany, 2018.

    [9] [9] QUEUTEY P, GUILMINEAU E, VISONNEAU M, et al. RANS hybrid RANSLES simulations around the Japan Bulk Carrier of the Tokyo 2015 CFD wkshop[C]Proceedings of the 19th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium (NuTTS 2016). St Pierre d''Oléron, France, 2016.

    [10] KORNEV N, ABBAS N. Vorticity structures and turbulence in the wake of full block ships[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23, 567-579(2017).

    [11] BOUSSINESQ J. Theorie de l'ecoulementtourbillant[J]. Mémoires Présentés Par Divers Savants à l'Académie Des Sciences De l'Institut De France, 23, 46-50(1877).

    [15] [15] HINO T, SUZUKI K, XU H, et al. Parameter tuning of kω turbulence model f ship flow simulation[C]Annual Spring Meeting of JASNAOE 2020. Mitaka, Japan, 2020.

    [16] [16] HELLSTEN A. Some improvements in Menter''s kω SST turbulence model[C]Proceedings of the 29th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics Conference. Albuquerque, NM, United States: AIAA, 1998.

    [18] HINO T. A 3D unstructured grid method for incompressible viscous flows[J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 182, 9-15(1997).

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hui XU, Takanori HINO, Zuogang CHEN. Numerical simulation of JBC flow based on GEKO model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(2): 73

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Ship Design and Performance

    Received: Sep. 24, 2020

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Mar. 24, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02123

    Topics