Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 17, Issue 4, 040602(2019)
Impact of optical–electrical conversion responsivity in sub-sampled photonic analog-to-digital converter
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of a single-channel (sub-sampled) PADC. E/O, electro-optical modulation; O/E, optical–electrical conversion; DSP, digital signal processor. (b) The output waveforms with different optical input powers. (c) The decrease of the OEC responsivity.
Fig. 2. Simulated and experimental results with or without time stretching to ultrafast optical pulses before and after photodetection. (a) and (b) are simulated temporal waveforms. (c) and (d) are experimental temporal waveforms.
Fig. 3. Experimental setups of (a) PMLL-based and (b) AMLL-based single-channel (sub-sampled) PADC systems. PMLL, passively mode-locked laser; AMLL, actively mode-locked laser; PC, polarization controller; MZM, Mach–Zehnder modulator; VOA, variable optical attenuator; PD, photodiode; EADC, electronic analog-to-digital converter.
Fig. 4. Measured variations of the digitized output power and
Fig. 5. Experimental results of the ENOB before and after the time-stretching process in the (a) PMLL-based and (b) AMLL-based PADC systems.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Fan Yang, Weiwen Zou, Lei Yu, Shaofu Xu, Jianping Chen, "Impact of optical–electrical conversion responsivity in sub-sampled photonic analog-to-digital converter," Chin. Opt. Lett. 17, 040602 (2019)
Category: Fiber optics and optical communications
Received: Nov. 5, 2018
Accepted: Jan. 10, 2019
Published Online: Apr. 3, 2019
The Author Email: Weiwen Zou (wzou@sjtu.edu.cn)