Characterization Parameter Construction for Comprehensive Toxicity of Water Based on Differential Features of OJIP Curve

Mengyuan Gu; Gaofang Yin; Tingting Gan; Nanjing Zhao; Peilong Qi; Min Chen; Zhichao Ding; Renqing Jia; Jinjing Liu; Mingjun Ma; Ruifang Yang; Li Fang; Wenqing Liu

doi:10.3788/AOS202242.1801004

Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 18, 1801004(2022)

Characterization Parameter Construction for Comprehensive Toxicity of Water Based on Differential Features of OJIP Curve

Mengyuan Gu^1,2,3, Gaofang Yin^1,3、*, Tingting Gan^1,3、**, Nanjing Zhao^1,3, Peilong Qi^1,2,3, Min Chen^1,2,3, Zhichao Ding^1,2,3, Renqing Jia^1,2,3, Jinjing Liu^1,2,3, Mingjun Ma^1,3, Ruifang Yang^1,3, Li Fang^1,3, and Wenqing Liu^1,3

Author Affiliations

¹Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China

²University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China

³Key Laboratory of Optical Monitoring Technology for Environment, Anhui Province, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(11)

Fig. 1. OJIP curve of algae. (a) Linear time scale; (b) logarithmic time scale

Download full size

Fig. 2. OJIP curve of algae under stress of blank control and five toxic substances

Download full size

Fig. 3. Distance sequence of curve

Download full size

Fig. 4. Discrete Fréchet distance

Download full size

Fig. 5. Cumulative angle

Download full size

Fig. 6. Classification accuracy rate of KNN with different characteristics of single curve

Download full size

Fig. 7. Classification accuracy rate of KNN with different characteristics of single and combined curves

Download full size

Table 1. Basic information of five tested toxic substances

View table

Table 1. Basic information of five tested toxic substances

Toxin （solvent）	Mode of action	Tested mass concentration /（μg·L^-1）	Stress time /min
DCMU （DMSO）	PS II inhibitor	1，2，5，10，20，40； 1，10，100，1000，10000，100000	80
DBMIB （DMSO）	Plastoquinone re-oxidation inhibitor	100，250，500，1000，2000，5000，10000，20000，40000，80000	60
MV （deionized water）	PS I inhibitor	5000，10000，25000，50000，100000，200000，400000，800000	150
Malathion （DMSO）	Cholinesterase inhibitor	1，2，5，10，20，40； 10000，25000，50000，100000，200000，400000	30
Carbofuran （DMSO）	Cholinesterase inhibitor	1，2，5，10，20，40； 10000，25000，50000，100000，200000，400000，800000	30

Table 2. Difference analysis results of Fv/Fm, PI_FCD, PI_ABS between treatment group and control group

View table

Table 2. Difference analysis results of Fv/Fm, PI_FCD, PI_ABS between treatment group and control group

Tested mass concentration of DCMU /（

μ g \cdot L^{- 1}

）

Fv/Fm

0.751

0.742^*/

0.217

0.731^**/

0.408

0.720^**/

0.855

0.680^**/

0.956

0.653^**/

0.972

0.612^**/

0.992

PI_FCD /

10^{- 2}

3.835

6.694^*/

0.661

12.663^**/

0.912

28.131^**/

0.986

39.260^**/

0.995

46.416^**/

0.998

51.969^**/

0.999

PIABS

4.470

3.470^**/

0.771

2.953^**/

0.982

1.853^**/

0.999

0.857^**/

1.000

0.543^**/

1.000

0.270^**/

1.000

Tested mass concentration of DBMIB /（

m g \cdot L^{- 1}

）

0.10

0.25

0.50

1.00

2.00

5.00

Fv/Fm

0.758

0.749^*/

0.560

0.731^**/

0.832

0.713^**/

0.975

0.666^**/

0.995

0.616^**/

0.998

0.601^**/

0.998

PI_FCD /

10^{- 2}

6.019

7.871/

0.819

9.237^*/

0.856

10.293^**/

0.984

12.221^**/

0.991

16.156^**/

0.998

16.862^**/

0.998

PI_ABS

4.808

3.997^**/

0.624

3.085^**/

0.852

2.268^**/

0.955

1.276^**/

0.976

0.693^**/

0.983

0.549^**/

0.984

Tested mass concentration of MV /（

m g \cdot L^{- 1}

）

100

200

Fv/Fm

0.764

0.757^*/

0.957

0.754^**/

0.959

0.717^**/

0.989

0.638^**/

0.998

0.549^**/

1.000

0.412^**/

1.000

PI_FCD /

10^{- 2}

1.482

3.506^*/

0.979

4.776^**/

0.976

7.985^**/

0.981

10.070^**/

0.996

31.302^**/

0.995

43.313^**/

0.996

PI_ABS

5.786

4.413^**/

0.923

4.49^**/

0.893

2.497^**/

0.981

1.093^**/

0.994

0.536^**/

0.995

0.223^**/

0.996

Tested mass concentration of Malathion /（

μ g \cdot L^{- 1}

）

Fv/Fm

0.762

0.758

/0.034

0.757/

0.758/

0.041

0.758/

0.062

0.758/

0.091

0.759/

0.092

PI_FCD /

10^{- 2}

1.130

1.293^*/

0.151

1.526^*/

0.523

1.966^*/

0.878

2.110^**/

0.894

2.442^**/

0.839

2.511^**/

0.964

PI_ABS

4.895

4.724/

0.154

4.593/

0.323

4.316^*/

0.863

4.348^*/

0.782

4.184^**/

0.897

4.001^**/

0.952

Tested mass concentration of Carbofuran /

（ $μ g \cdot L^{- 1}$ ）

Fv/Fm

0.763

0.764/

0.005

0.763/

0.019

0.759/

0.818

0.759/

0.814

0.759/

0.858

PI_FCD /

10^{- 2}

1.375

1.627/

0.875

2.087/

0.883

2.790/

0.980

4.021^**/

0.991

4.541^**/

0.993

5.018^**/

0.998

PI_ABS

5.074

5.194/

0.246

4.972/

0.230

4.960/

0.121

4.147^**/

0.906

4.044^**/

0.927

4.034^**/

0.900

Table 3. Minimum detection limits of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCDand PI_ABS as response indexes
View table
Table 3. Minimum detection limits of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCDand PI_ABS as response indexes
Toxin Minimum detection limit
$\frac{F v}{F m}$ /
（ $μ g$ · $L^{- 1}$ ）
PI_FCD /
（ $μ g$ · $L^{- 1}$ ）
PI_ABS /
（ $μ g$ · $L^{- 1}$ ）
DCMU 2.70 0.34 3.52
DBMIB 213.50 463.70 794.80
MV 7720.00 3290.00 18190.00
Malathion - 2.96 64.71
Carbofuran - 3.57 15.98

Table 4. Maximum response mass concentrations of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCD and PI_ABS as response indexes
View table
Table 4. Maximum response mass concentrations of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCD and PI_ABS as response indexes
Toxin Maximum response mass concentration
$\frac{F v}{F m}$ /
（ $m g$ · $L^{- 1}$ ）
PI_FCD /
（ $m g$ · $L^{- 1}$ ）
PI_ABS /
（ $m g$ · $L^{- 1}$ ）
DCMU >100 >100 0.1
DBMIB 20 80 10
MV >200 >800 400
Malathion - >400 200
Carbofuran - >800 400

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Mengyuan Gu, Gaofang Yin, Tingting Gan, Nanjing Zhao, Peilong Qi, Min Chen, Zhichao Ding, Renqing Jia, Jinjing Liu, Mingjun Ma, Ruifang Yang, Li Fang, Wenqing Liu. Characterization Parameter Construction for Comprehensive Toxicity of Water Based on Differential Features of OJIP Curve[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(18): 1801004

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics

Received: Jan. 11, 2022

Accepted: Feb. 28, 2022

Published Online: Sep. 15, 2022

The Author Email: Yin Gaofang (gfyin@aiofm.ac.cn), Gan Tingting (ttgan@aiofm.ac.cn)

DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.1801004

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Basic information of five tested toxic substances

Table 1. Basic information of five tested toxic substances

Table 2. Difference analysis results of Fv/Fm, PIFCD, PIABS between treatment group and control group

Table 2. Difference analysis results of Fv/Fm, PIFCD, PIABS between treatment group and control group

Table 3. Minimum detection limits of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PIFCD and PIABS as response indexes

Table 3. Minimum detection limits of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PIFCD and PIABS as response indexes

Table 4. Maximum response mass concentrations of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PIFCD and PIABS as response indexes

Table 4. Maximum response mass concentrations of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PIFCD and PIABS as response indexes

Table 2. Difference analysis results of Fv/Fm, PI_FCD, PI_ABS between treatment group and control group

Table 2. Difference analysis results of Fv/Fm, PI_FCD, PI_ABS between treatment group and control group

Table 3. Minimum detection limits of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCDand PI_ABS as response indexes

Table 3. Minimum detection limits of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCDand PI_ABS as response indexes

Table 4. Maximum response mass concentrations of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCD and PI_ABS as response indexes

Table 4. Maximum response mass concentrations of five toxic substances with Fv/Fm, PI_FCD and PI_ABS as response indexes