Fig. 1. Process of imaging. (a) represents the normalized difference mode for a first-order moment and central moment, employing Floyd–Steinberg dithering for binarization. (b) demonstrates a sequence of modulated modes. (c) shows a rotating moving target with a circular trajectory and detected light intensity signals. (d) Reconstructed pattern sequences after shifting in the reverse direction.

Fig. 2. Trajectory and rotation angle of the target. (a) Trajectories in the x- and y-directions. (b) Angle of the rotation of the target.

Fig. 3. Target simulation results in the simple scene. (a) The original image. (b) The target image reconstructed by our method. (c) The target image reconstructed by the GM method. (d) The actual position and the calculation results of the two methods. (e) The comparison of the angular errors of the two methods. (f) The comparison of the axial length errors of the two methods.

Fig. 4. Target simulation results in the complex scene. (a) The original image. (b) The target image reconstructed by our method. (c) The target image reconstructed by the GM method. (d) The actual position and the calculation results of the two methods. (e) The comparison of the angular errors of the two methods. (f) The comparison of the axial length errors of the two methods.

Fig. 5. Diagram of the experimental setup. The LED is the light source, and the target moves and rotates through three-axis motorized stages. The collecting lens projects the image of the target onto the DMD for modulation, and the modulated light intensity is collected on the PMT by the converging lens. The PMT converts the optical signal into an electrical signal, which is captured by the acquisition card and sent to the computer.

Fig. 6. Experimental results. (a) Full sampling reconstruction of images. (b) The target image reconstructed by our method. (c) The target image reconstructed by the GM method. (d) The actual position and the calculation results of the two methods. (e) The comparison of the angular errors of the two methods. (f) The comparison of the axial length errors of the two methods.