Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 51, Issue 14, 1400001(2024)

Overview of Extraction Techniques for Scattering‑Type Scanning Near‑Field Optical Signal (Invited)

Tao Jiang1,2、*, Zerui Wang1, Lei Zhou1, Zhou Zhou1, Zhichen Zhao1, Xinbin Cheng1,2, and Zhanshan Wang1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai Professional Technical Service Platform for Full-Spectrum and High-Performance Optical Thin Film Devices and Applications, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Digital Optics, MOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, Institute of Precision Optical Engineering, Shanghai 200092, China
  • 2Shanghai Research Institute of Intelligent Autonomous Systems, Tongji University, Shanghai 201210, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Setup of s-SNOM experiment based on homodyne detection
    Point-dipole model of tip-sample interaction
    Point-dipole model (left) compared with finite-dipole model (right)
    Schematic of self-homodyne detection
    Schematic of (quadrature) homodyne detection
    Schematic of heterodyne detection
    Schematic of pseudoheterodyne detection
    Overlapping usage scenarios of mainstream near-field signal extraction techniques. (a) Near-field characterization of α‑MoO3 hyperbolic phonon polariton (pseudoheterodyne detection technology)[83]; (b) effect of Mo isotope-enriched of α‑MoO3 on polariton loss of hyperbolic phonons was investigated by near field microscopy (pseudoheterodyne detection technology)[91]; (c) near-field characterization of hyperbolic phonon polaritons coated with α-MoO3 by thin-layer of hexagonal boron nitride (self-homodyne detection technology)[92]; (d) grid-dependent propagation properties of hyperbolic phonon polariton of α-MoO3 were investigated by near-field microscopy (quadrature homodyne detection technique)[93]; (e) self-homodyne detection technique[64] and (f) pseudoheterodyne detection technique[94] were used to characterise graphene plasmonic Doppler effect
    Extracting near-field phase information using quadrature homodyne detection or pseudoheterodyne detection. (a) Near-field phase and morphology images of water film growth on gibbsite nanoparticle (quadrature homodyne detection)[26]; (b) near-field phase and corresponding line profile images of 3C—SiC nanowires with low stacking fault density (left) and high stacking fault density (right) (pseudoheterodyne detection)[19]; (c) scanning electron microscope image of silicon nanowires and near-field phase image showing distribution of p-i-n junctions (quadrature homodyne detection)[28]
    Near-field imaging of Au nanobar arrays. (a) Image of height of Au nano-antenna arrays obtained from AFM measurement; (b) image of near-field signal intensity using self-homodyne detection; (c) near-field phaseand (d) amplitude images obtained by quadrature homodyne detection; (e) near-field phase and (f) amplitude images obtained by pseudoheterodyne detection
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tao Jiang, Zerui Wang, Lei Zhou, Zhou Zhou, Zhichen Zhao, Xinbin Cheng, Zhanshan Wang. Overview of Extraction Techniques for Scattering‑Type Scanning Near‑Field Optical Signal (Invited)[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(14): 1400001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: reviews

    Received: Feb. 27, 2024

    Accepted: Apr. 16, 2024

    Published Online: Jul. 2, 2024

    The Author Email: Jiang Tao (tjiang@tongji.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL240626

    CSTR:32183.14.CJL240626

    Topics