Chinese Optics, Volume. 15, Issue 4, 675(2022)
Fusion of infrared and visible light images based on visual saliency weighting and maximum gradient singular value
Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of decomposition and reconstruction of RGST
Fig. 7. Infrared and visible light images used in the fusion experiment
Fig. 8. Comparison of AVG values under different decomposition levels
Fig. 9. Comparison of IE values under different decomposition levels
Table 1. Objective evaluation indicators for the first group of image fusion experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Objective evaluation indicators for the first group of image fusion experiments
第1组 融合实验 评价指标 AVG IE QE SF SD SCD t CVT 10.59 7.10 0.58 18.88 35.67 1.54 3.93 NSCT 6.42 7.51 0.45 11.41 47.22 1.59 109.8 ADF 10.22 6.91 0.53 17.64 30.76 1.51 2.07 WLS 11.14 7.14 0.398 20.38 41.19 1.74 4.18 MSVD 9.36 6.84 0.37 16.63 29.26 1.52 0.76 TSF 9.61 7.27 0.56 17.76 40.58 1.68 0.13 本文方法 11.44 7.42 0.62 20.65 47.66 1.78 8.82
Table 2. Objective evaluation indicators for the second group of image fusion experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Objective evaluation indicators for the second group of image fusion experiments
第2组 融合实验 评价指标 AVG IE QE SF SD SCD t CVT 8.76 7.05 0.58 21.67 33.65 1.51 1.81 NSCT 5.73 7.17 0.42 12.15 37.88 1.20 65.1 ADF 7.55 6.83 0.50 17.18 28.28 1.50 1.25 WLS 8.88 7.06 0.46 20.88 33.54 1.65 2.36 MSVD 7.84 6.83 0.46 19.75 28.42 1.54 0.35 TSF 7.68 7.11 0.55 19.40 35.16 1.58 0.13 本文方法 9.44 7.26 0.62 22.95 40.11 1.65 4.64
Table 3. Objective evaluation indicators for the third group of image fusion experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Objective evaluation indicators for the third group of image fusion experiments
第3组 融合实验 评价指标 AVG IE QE SF SD SCD t CVT 4.98 6.91 0.59 14.80 34.32 1.60 2.22 NSCT 4.13 7.37 0.54 9.78 50.49 1.62 91.1 ADF 3.03 6.62 0.41 8.88 28.99 1.52 1.42 WLS 5.11 7.10 0.55 15.47 47.80 1.81 3.16 MSVD 3.95 6.65 0.46 11.99 29.52 1.53 0.45 TSF 4.918 7.08 0.63 14.93 39.02 1.70 0.14 本文方法 5.75 7.15 0.65 16.39 48.65 1.82 7.51
Table 4. Objective evaluation indicators for the fourth group of image fusion experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Objective evaluation indicators for the fourth group of image fusion experiments
第4组 融合实验 评价指标 AVG IE QE SF SD SCD t CVT 9.18 6.91 0.39 17.27 33.98 1.48 1.34 NSCT 6.06 7.18 0.31 11.15 38.07 1.21 29.46 ADF 5.37 6.62 0.34 10.10 27.90 1.46 0.90 WLS 9.82 6.96 0.39 17.99 34.19 1.58 1.29 MSVD 7.94 6.66 0.32 14.57 28.34 1.45 0.18 TSF 8.13 7.04 0.43 16.82 37.05 1.63 0.11 本文方法 9.84 7.15 0.43 18.42 39.04 1.68 2.44
Table 5. Objective evaluation indicators for the fifth group of image fusion experiments
View tableView in ArticleTable 5. Objective evaluation indicators for the fifth group of image fusion experiments
第5组 融合实验 评价指标 AVG IE QE SF SD SCD t CVT 12.25 7.54 0.50 24.83 46.91 1.75 2.25 NSCT 9.75 7.81 0.43 18.79 55.87 1.64 53.80 ADF 9.19 6.97 0.42 17.96 32.86 1.74 1.33 WLS 12.53 7.35 0.38 24.62 43.74 1.87 2.64 MSVD 10.66 6.99 0.43 22.59 33.35 1.78 0.32 TSF 12,00 7.68 0.53 25.74 52.17 1.84 0.15 本文方法 14.31 7.76 0.57 28.76 57.92 1.89 3.42
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Bo-yang CHENG, Ting LI, Yu-lin WANG. Fusion of infrared and visible light images based on visual saliency weighting and maximum gradient singular value[J]. Chinese Optics, 2022, 15(4): 675
Category: Original Article
Received: Jun. 13, 2022
Accepted: --
Published Online: Sep. 6, 2022
The Author Email:
