Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 48, Issue 17, 1701003(2021)

Modeling of Hollow Ring Laser Heat Source and Finite Element Simulation of Temperature Field

Jiachao Xu1, Zhixin Xia1、*, Peng Chen1, Shihong Shi1, Shuhai Huang2, and Liang Wang3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Laser Manufacturing Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China
  • 2Southwest Technology and Engineering Research Institute, Chongqing 400050, China
  • 3Institute of Laser Advanced Manufacturing, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Schematic diagram of laser cladding device and powder feeding in light
    Measurement results based on probe-type beam quality analyzer. (a) Beam quality actual measurement diagram; (b) schematic diagram of energy distribution in vertical section of hollow ring heat source
    Simplified CAD model of hollow ring heat source and schematic diagram of micro-element. (a) Simplified CAD model of hollow ring heat source; (b) micro-element integral along x and z directions; (c) micro-element integral long y direction
    Topographies of molten pool under RSM processes (defocus/power/scanning speed). (a) -3 mm/1000 W/6 mm·s-1; (b) -2 mm/1000 W/3 mm·s-1; (c) -4 mm/1000 W/3 mm·s-1; (d) -4 mm/1000 W/9 mm·s-1; (e) -2 mm/1000 W/9 mm·s-1; (f) -3 mm/600 W/3 mm·s-1; (g) -2 mm/600 W/6 mm·s-1; (h) -4 mm/600 W/6 mm·s-1
    Hollow ring heat source model diagram
    Geometric mesh modeling
    Hollow ring laser heat source temperature distribution cloud map. (a) Cross-sectional temperature distribution; (b) top view of heat source temperature distribution
    Temperature distribution diagram of the vertical section of the molten pool
    Schematic diagram of the laser scanning path on the cladding layer
    Comparison between simulated thermal cycle curve and measured data during laser melting deposition
    • Table 1. Mass fraction of each element in U75V steel substrate and powder

      View table

      Table 1. Mass fraction of each element in U75V steel substrate and powder

      ElementCSiMnVSPFe
      Mass fraction in substrate0.750.700.840.08≤0.005≤0.01Bal.
      Mass fraction in powder0.7090.7040.810.089≤0.005≤0.007Bal.
    • Table 2. Process interval used in response surface design

      View table

      Table 2. Process interval used in response surface design

      Process parameterZ /mmv /(mm·s-1)P /W
      Parameter interval[-2,-4,-1][3,9,3][600,1400,400]
    • Table 3. Response surface experiment parameters and results

      View table

      Table 3. Response surface experiment parameters and results

      No.Z /mmP /Wv /(mm·s-1)h /μmw /μm
      1-31400312583545
      2-21400610032842
      3-4100096742768
      4-4100039683201
      5-2100098442120
      6-260065051955
      7-460064522715
      8-2100039782826
      9-3100067322469
      10-3100067902458
      11-3100067722449
      12-360094672261
      13-360035402438
      14-3100067522450
      15-3100067762458
      16-3140098372739
      17-4140069053266
    • Table 4. RSM model analysis of penetration width and penetration depth

      View table

      Table 4. RSM model analysis of penetration width and penetration depth

      SourcePenetration depthPenetration width
      F' valueP' valueF' valueP' value
      Model228.51<0.0001111.57<0.0001
      A-Z461.15<0.000118.990.0033
      B-P865.20<0.0001720.80<0.0001
      C-V426.31<0.0001147.38<0.0001
      AB21.380.00240.700.4297
      AC14.110.00718.880.0205
      BC74.92<0.000141.990.0003
      A238.830.00042.620.1497
      B251.720.000228.070.0011
      C283.28< 0.000137.770.0005
      R-Squared0.99310.9966
      Adj R-Squared0.98420.9922
      Pred R-Squared0.92990.9471
    • Table 5. Thermal physical parameters of U75V steel

      View table

      Table 5. Thermal physical parameters of U75V steel

      Temperature /Kρ /(g·cm-3)κ /(W·m-1·K-1)Cp /(J·kg-1·K-1)α /(10-5·K-1)
      1007.85039.724811
      2507.81036.475071.5
      3507.71033.595201.53
      4507.70030.705631.57
      5507.70029.396181.61
      6507.70028.117611.79
      7507.70023.415820.67
      8507.70025.706312.3
      9507.60026.897182.07
      11507.6002.13
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jiachao Xu, Zhixin Xia, Peng Chen, Shihong Shi, Shuhai Huang, Liang Wang. Modeling of Hollow Ring Laser Heat Source and Finite Element Simulation of Temperature Field[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(17): 1701003

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: laser devices and laser physics

    Received: Dec. 2, 2020

    Accepted: Mar. 5, 2021

    Published Online: Sep. 1, 2021

    The Author Email: Xia Zhixin (xiazhixin2000@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL202148.1701003

    Topics