Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 57, Issue 8, 082801(2020)

An Improved Moment Matching Algorithm for Non-Uniform Correction of Hyperspectral Images

Zanwei Yang1,2, Liangliang Zheng1、*, Yong Wu1, and Hongsong Qu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Advanced Space Technology, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Flow chart of improved moment matching non-uniformity correction algorithm
    Simulated images. (a) Original image; (b) image with stripe noise
    Destriped results of simulated image in Fig. 2(b) by different methods. (a) BW; (b) WMM; (c) DSLFRI; (d) HM; (e) proposed method
    Gray mean values of simulated image in column.(a)Original image;(b) image with stripe noise
    Gray mean values of destriped results in column by different methods. (a) BW; (b) WMM; (c) DSLFRI; (d) HM; (e) proposed method
    Destriped results of hyperspectral image of band 25 by different methods. (a) Original image; (b)BW; (c) WMM; (d) DSLFRI; (e) HM; (f) proposed method
    Destriped results of hyperspectral image of band 27 by different methods. (a) Original image; (b) BW; (c) WMM; (d) DSLFRI; (e) HM; (f) proposed method
    Gray mean scale of destriped results of hyperspectral image of band 25 by different methods. (a) Original image; (b) BW; (c) WMM; (d) DSLFRI; (e) HM; (f) proposed method
    Gray mean values of destriped results of hyperspectral image of band 27 by different methods. (a) Original image; (b) BW; (c) WMM; (d) DSLFRI; (e) HM; (f) proposed method
    • Table 1. Comparison of assessment criteria for simulated image in Fig. 2(b)

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of assessment criteria for simulated image in Fig. 2(b)

      MethodBWWMMDSLFRIHMProposed method
      MSE21.05507.83568.053317.77131.8726
      PSNR /dB34.897239.190139.071135.633645.4064
      SSIM0.57440.96310.96490.73360.9903
    • Table 2. Comparison of objective indexes for simulated images with different noises

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of objective indexes for simulated images with different noises

      Destripe noiseIndexBWWMMDSLFRIHMProposed method
      Random noise in [10,40]MSE20.13566.19877.072735.20711.9322
      PSNR35.091240.207839.634932.664545.2703
      SSIM0.58270.96720.96580.73690.9873
      Random noise in [20,40]MSE21.05507.83568.053317.77131.8726
      PSNR34.897239.190139.071135.633645.4064
      SSIM0.57440.96310.96490.73360.9903
      Random noise in [30,40]MSE22.744010.915611.012629.53071.7772
      PSNR34.562137.750337.711933.428145.6335
      SSIM0.55890.96120.96360.65540.9890
      Periodic noise in [10,40]MSE19.75784.60476.038913.66091.7803
      PSNR35.173441.496340.321236.776045.6259
      SSIM0.57860.97000.96530.79940.9918
      Periodic noise in [20,40]MSE20.11465.12816.410414.78421.7127
      PSNR35.095741.031340.061936.432845.7941
      SSIM0.56670.96810.96540.76670.9921
      Periodic noise in [30,40]MSE20.23255.30426.579115.39841.6796
      PSNR35.070340.884639.949136.256145.8788
      SSIM0.56050.96790.96500.74920.9924
    • Table 3. Comparison of objective indexes for hyperspectral image of band 25

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of objective indexes for hyperspectral image of band 25

      MethodOriginal imageBWWMMDSLFRIHMProposed method
      ICV6.98146.86347.06897.16787.36717.6435
      DEC160.0580163.9211156.0881151.8557141.0393136.6519
      RM2.77920.80472.60962.60592.65772.4399
    • Table 4. Comparison of objective indexes for hyperspectral image of band 27

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of objective indexes for hyperspectral image of band 27

      MethodOriginal imageBWWMMDSLFRIHMProposed method
      ICV8.77648.47868.93388.58838.65299.7724
      DEC116.2303123.5045112.125897.3851100.054494.8759
      RM2.92380.93462.78182.76763.24592.5334
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zanwei Yang, Liangliang Zheng, Yong Wu, Hongsong Qu. An Improved Moment Matching Algorithm for Non-Uniform Correction of Hyperspectral Images[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(8): 082801

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Oct. 1, 2019

    Accepted: Nov. 15, 2019

    Published Online: Apr. 3, 2020

    The Author Email: Liangliang Zheng (adqe@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP57.082801

    Topics