Forensic Sciences Research, Volume. 9, Issue 3, owae047(2024)
Challenges of accreditation in forensic fields concerned with human identification: a survey of European facial examiners
[5] N Bacci, JG Davimes, M Steyn et al. Forensic facial comparison: current status, limitations, and future directions. Biology (Basel), 10, 1269(2021).
[6] R Moreton, M Bindemann. Forensic Face Matching: Research and Practice, 144-173(2021).
[7] D White, JD Dunn, AC Schmid et al. Error rates in users of automatic face recognition systems. PloS One, 10(2015).
[8] D Gibelli, Z Obertová, S Ritz-Timme et al. The identification of living persons on images: a literature review. Leg Med, 19, 52-60(2016).
[9] L Sexton, R Moreton, E Noyes et al. The effect of facial ageing on forensic facial image comparison. Appl Cogn Psychol, 38(2024).
[12] Z Obertová, P Adalian, E Baccino et al. The status of forensic anthropology in Europe and South Africa: results of the 2016 FASE questionnaire on forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci, 64, 1017-1025(2019).
[13] I Siebke, C Abegg, T Fracasso et al. Awareness of forensic anthropology in Switzerland: a survey of forensic practitioners, police and prosecutors. Int J Leg Med, 138, 1067-1077(2024).
[14] A Towler, RI Kemp, AM Burton et al. Do professional facial image comparison training courses work?. PloS One, 14(2019).
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Zuzana Obertová, Inga Siebke, Grit Schüler. Challenges of accreditation in forensic fields concerned with human identification: a survey of European facial examiners[J]. Forensic Sciences Research, 2024, 9(3): owae047
Category: Research Articles
Received: Jun. 21, 2024
Accepted: Aug. 8, 2024
Published Online: Sep. 22, 2025
The Author Email: Zuzana Obertová (zuzana.obertova@uwa.edu.au)