Evaluation of high-quality provenances of Dendrobium officinale suitable for greenhouse cultivation in northern China

Hongyang Li; Yuqian Huang; Xin Li; Qing Hu; Jianwu Ren

doi:10.14188/j.ajsh.20241206001

Biotic Resources, Volume. 47, Issue 3, 251(2025)

Evaluation of high-quality provenances of Dendrobium officinale suitable for greenhouse cultivation in northern China

Hongyang Li, Yuqian Huang, Xin Li, Qing Hu^*, and Jianwu Ren

Author Affiliations

School of Biological Science and Technology， Beijing Forestry University， Beijing100083， China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(11)

Table 1. Table 1Basic information of high-quality provenances of Dendrobium officinale

View table

View in Article

Table 1. Table 1Basic information of high-quality provenances of Dendrobium officinale

编号	来源地	纬度	经度	海拔/m	平均气温/℃	年平均降雨量/mm
R1	浙江庆元	27.5°N~27.7°N	118.8°E~119.5°E	1 320	17.4	1 760
R2	江西玉山	28.4°N~28.7°N	117.9°E~118.2°E	1 240	18.0	1 841
R3	江西鹰潭	28.2°N~28.5°N	116.6°E~117.5°E	1 080	18.4	1 882
R4	浙江武义	28.8°N~29.0°N	119.5°E~119.9°E	1 210	17.1	1 474
R5	浙江义乌	29.3°N~29.5°N	119.8°E~120.3°E	900	17.0	1 350
R6	安徽大别山	31.0°N~31.5°N	112.7°E~117.2°E	1 450	14.5	1 832

Table 2. Table 2Hierarchical structure of provenance evaluation system of Dendrobium officinale

View table

View in Article

Table 2. Table 2Hierarchical structure of provenance evaluation system of Dendrobium officinale

A(目标层)	C(约束层)	P(指标层)
A1(鲜食型)	C1(品相性状)	P1(茎杆构型)，P2(叶片特征)，P3(花形态)
	C2(品质性状)	P4(多糖含量)，P5(甘露糖含量)，P6(粗纤维含量)
	C3(区域适应性)	P7(抗寒性)，P8(单丛萌发新芽数)
A2(盆栽型)	C1(品相性状)	P1(茎杆构型)，P2(叶片特征)，P3(花形态)
	C2(品质性状)	P4(多糖含量)，P5(甘露糖含量)，P6(粗纤维含量)
	C3(区域适应性)	P7(抗寒性)，P8(单丛萌发新芽数)

Table 3. Table 3Scoring criteria for specific indicators of Dendrobium officinale provenances

View table

View in Article

Table 3. Table 3Scoring criteria for specific indicators of Dendrobium officinale provenances

评价指标	评分标准
评价指标	4分	6分	8分	10分
茎秆构型	矮杆细茎型（较细，短或呈弯曲状）长杆细茎型（圆柱形，细长或呈弯曲状）	矮秆粗茎型（短，一般粗）	匍匐粗茎型（匍匐，纺锤形，一般长，粗壮）	直立，纺锤粗茎型（纺锤形，粗壮，一般长）长秆粗茎型（圆柱形，粗壮而长）
叶片特征	长披针形，呈深绿色，具多紫色斑点	长披针形，呈绿色或深绿色，具少量紫色斑点	卵圆形或宽披针形，呈绿色或深绿色，具少量紫色斑点	卵圆形，呈绿色，无紫色斑点
花形态	花量少，淡黄绿色，唇瓣斑点为暗紫色，分布不美观	花量一般，淡黄绿色，唇瓣斑点为暗紫色，分布不够美观	花量一般，黄绿色，唇瓣斑点为紫色，分布美观	花量大，黄绿色，唇瓣斑点颜色鲜艳，分布美观
多糖含量	<25%	［25%，28%）	［28%，30%）	≥30%
甘露糖含量	<15%	［15%，20%）	［20%，25%）	≥25%
粗纤维含量	≥8%	［6%，8%）	［4%，6%）	<4%
冻害指数	≥13%	［10%，13%）	［7%，10%）	<7%
单丛发芽数	≤3	（3，5］	（5，7］	>7

Table 4. Table 4Comparison of qualitative traits of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

View table

View in Article

Table 4. Table 4Comparison of qualitative traits of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

编号	直立性	茎秆构型	叶片特征	花形态
R1	直立	青绿色，很少有紫色斑点，圆柱形	叶形狭长，长披针形，呈绿色，无紫色斑点，叶背面青绿色	花淡黄绿色，唇瓣紫色斑点少，片状分布
R2	匍匐	紫绿色，紫色斑点多，纺锤形	宽披针形，呈深绿色，少量紫色斑点，部分叶片叶背面具多紫色斑点，且叶缘呈紫红色	花黄绿色，唇瓣有紫红色斑点，点状分布
R3	直立	暗绿色，紫色斑点较多，纺锤形	卵圆形，呈绿色，无紫色斑点，叶背面为青绿色	花量少，黄绿色，唇瓣有暗紫色斑点，点状分布
R4	直立	紫红色，紫色斑点多，圆柱形	长披针形，呈深绿色，少量紫色斑点，部分叶片叶背面具多紫色斑点，且叶缘为紫红色	花量大，黄绿色，唇瓣暗紫红色斑点多，片状分布
R5	直立	黄绿色，紫色斑点稍多，圆柱形	宽披针形，呈绿色，无紫色斑点，叶背面为青绿色	秋花，淡黄绿色，唇瓣有紫红色斑点，点状分布
R6	直立	深绿色，紫色斑点很少，呈纺锤形	卵圆形，呈深绿色，无紫色斑点，叶背面为青绿色	花量大，黄绿色，唇瓣有鲜紫红斑点，片状分布

Table 5. Table 5Comparison of quantitative traits of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

View table

View in Article

Table 5. Table 5Comparison of quantitative traits of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

编号	茎长/cm	茎粗/mm	茎节长/cm	叶长/cm	叶宽/cm
平均值	16.50±4.40	4.80±1.12	1.54±0.38	4.49±0.75	1.49±0.24
R1	17.95±3.27^Bb	5.88±0.58^Aa	1.86±0.31^Aa	5.05±0.70^AaB	1.62±0.22^Aa
R2	13.84±2.97^CcDd	6.24±0.74^Aa	1.47±0.28^Bb	4.26±0.48^bC	1.51±0.27^AaBbc
R3	12.63±1.71^Dd	4.43±0.66^Bb	1.17±0.23^Bc	3.78±0.53^Cc	1.42±0.21^ABbc
R4	23.75±2.93^Aa	4.09±0.57^BbCc	1.95±0.30^Aa	5.18±0.65^Aa	1.38±0.28^Bc
R5	15.65±2.14^BCc	3.57±0.36^Cc	1.39±0.27^Bbc	4.46±0.71^BbC	1.49±0.23^AaBbc
R6	15.17±1.62^Cc	4.61±0.70^Bb	1.41±0.25^Bbc	4.19±0.44^bC	1.53±0.21^AaBb

Table 6. Table 6Comparison of the content of effective components in the stems of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

View table

View in Article

Table 6. Table 6Comparison of the content of effective components in the stems of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

编号	多糖/%	甘露糖/%	粗纤维/%
平均值	26.17±3.52	21.24±3.18	5.46±1.68
R1	30.41±2.64^Aa	24.35±1.13^Aa	4.62±0.57^Cc
R2	28.74±2.73^AaBb	25.47±0.93^Aa	3.60±0.44^Dd
R3	25.14±2.34^Ccd	17.67±1.67^Dd	6.76±0.88^Bb
R4	22.81±2.26^Dd	18.80±1.73^CcDd	4.68±0.54^Cc
R5	23.55±1.95^Cd	21.53±1.05^Bb	8.21±0.93^Aa
R6	26.39±2.02^BbCc	19.66±1.70^BCc	4.88±0.44^Cc

Table 7. Table 7Comparison of freezing injury and recovery growth of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

View table

View in Article

Table 7. Table 7Comparison of freezing injury and recovery growth of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances

编号	冻害指数	单丛萌发新芽数/个
平均值	9.80±3.21	6.43±1.74
R1	8.10±1.99^CcDd	7.00±1.58^AaBb
R2	7.62±1.56^CDd	6.80±1.64^AaBb
R3	14.29±2.06^Aa	4.40±1.14^Cc
R4	10.24±1.63^BbCc	6.80±1.48^AaBb
R5	12.38±0.78^AaBb	5.40±1.14^BbCc
R6	6.19±1.23^Dd	8.20±0.84^Aa

Table 8. Table 8A1 fresh food type judgment matrix and consistency test

View table

View in Article

Table 8. Table 8A1 fresh food type judgment matrix and consistency test

层级	指标	C1	C2	C3	权重（W）	层级	指标	P1	P2	P3	权重（W）
A1⁃C	C1	1	1/7	1/5	0.075 1	C1⁃P	P1	1	5	5	0.714 2
	C2	7	1	2	0.591 7		P2	1/5	1	1	0.142 9
	C3	5	1/2	1	0.333 2		P3	1/5	1	1	0.142 9
检验	λ_max=3.014 2，CI=0.007 1，RI=0.514 9， CR=0.013 8<0.1					检验	λ_max=3.000 0，CI=0，RI=0.514 9，CR=0<0.1
C2⁃P		P4	P5	P6	权重（W）	C3⁃P		P7	P8		权重（W）
		1	5	3	0.637 0			1	5		0.833 3
		1/5	1	1/3	0.104 7			1/5	1		0.166 7
		1/3	3	1	0.258 3
检验	λ_max=3.038 5，CI=0.019 3，RI=0.514 9， CR=0.037 5<0.1					检验	λ_max=2.000 0，CI=0，RI=0，CR=0<0.1

Table 9. Table 9A2 potted plant type judgment matrix and consistency test

View table

View in Article

Table 9. Table 9A2 potted plant type judgment matrix and consistency test

层级	指标	C1	C2	C3	权重（W）	层级	指标	P1	P2	P3	权重（W）
A2⁃C	C1	1	5	1	0.454 6	C1⁃P	P1	1	3	3	0.600 0
	C2	1/5	1	1/5	0.090 9		P2	1/3	1	1	0.200 0
	C3	1	5	1	0.454 6		P3	1/3	1	1	0.200 0
检验	λ_max=3.000 0，CI=0，RI=0.514 9，CR=0<0.1					检验	λ_max=3.000 0，CI=0，RI=0.514 9，CR=0<0.1
C2⁃P		P4	P5	P6	权重（W）	C3⁃P		P7	P8		权重（W）
		1	3	3	0.600 0			1	1/3		0.250 0
		1/3	1	1	0.200 0			3	1		0.750 0
		1/3	1	1	0.200 0
检验	λ_max=3.000 0，CI=0，RI=0.514 9，CR=0<0.1					检验	λ_max=2.000 0，CI=0，RI=0，CR=0<0.1

Table 10. Table 10The total sorting value of the standard layer P for the target layer A

View table

View in Article

Table 10. Table 10The total sorting value of the standard layer P for the target layer A

约束层	指标层	A1权重值	排名	A2权重值	排名
C1	P1	0.053 6	6	0.272 8	2
	P2	0.010 7	7	0.090 9	4
	P3	0.010 7	7	0.090 9	4
C2	P4	0.376 9	1	0.054 5	6
	P5	0.376 9	4	0.018 2	7
	P6	0.152 8	3	0.018 2	7
C3	P7	0.277 7	2	0.113 7	3
C3	P8	0.055 5	5	0.340 9	1
检验		CI=0.011 4，RI=0.343 3，CR(0.033 2)<0.1		CI=0，RI=0.280 9，CR(0)<0.1

Table 11. Table 11Comprehensive evaluation value of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances
View table
View in Article
Table 11. Table 11Comprehensive evaluation value of Dendrobium officinale from different provenances
编号鲜食型/分盆栽型/分
R1 8.860 2 8.655 4
R2 8.428 8 8.073 6
R3 5.465 4 5.955 0
R4 5.597 8 6.427 8
R5 4.999 6 5.709 6
R6 7.937 8 9.673 8

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Hongyang Li, Yuqian Huang, Xin Li, Qing Hu, Jianwu Ren. Evaluation of high-quality provenances of Dendrobium officinale suitable for greenhouse cultivation in northern China[J]. Biotic Resources, 2025, 47(3): 251

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category:

Received: Dec. 6, 2024

Accepted: Jun. 9, 2025

Published Online: Jul. 28, 2025

The Author Email: Qing Hu (89770936@qq.com)

DOI:10.14188/j.ajsh.20241206001

Topics

Table 1. Table 1Basic information of high-quality provenances of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i>

Table 1. Table 1Basic information of high-quality provenances of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i>

Table 2. Table 2Hierarchical structure of provenance evaluation system of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i>

Table 2. Table 2Hierarchical structure of provenance evaluation system of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i>

Table 3. Table 3Scoring criteria for specific indicators of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> provenances

Table 3. Table 3Scoring criteria for specific indicators of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> provenances

Table 4. Table 4Comparison of qualitative traits of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> from different provenances

Table 4. Table 4Comparison of qualitative traits of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> from different provenances

Table 5. Table 5Comparison of quantitative traits of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> from different provenances

Table 5. Table 5Comparison of quantitative traits of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> from different provenances

Table 6. Table 6Comparison of the content of effective components in the stems of <i>Dendrobium officinale </i>from different provenances

Table 6. Table 6Comparison of the content of effective components in the stems of <i>Dendrobium officinale </i>from different provenances

Table 7. Table 7Comparison of freezing injury and recovery growth of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> from different provenances

Table 7. Table 7Comparison of freezing injury and recovery growth of <i>Dendrobium officinale</i> from different provenances

Table 8. Table 8A1 fresh food type judgment matrix and consistency test

Table 8. Table 8A1 fresh food type judgment matrix and consistency test

Table 9. Table 9A2 potted plant type judgment matrix and consistency test

Table 9. Table 9A2 potted plant type judgment matrix and consistency test

Table 10. Table 10The total sorting value of the standard layer P for the target layer A

Table 10. Table 10The total sorting value of the standard layer P for the target layer A

Table 11. Table 11Comprehensive evaluation value of <i>Dendrobium officinale from</i> different provenances

Table 11. Table 11Comprehensive evaluation value of <i>Dendrobium officinale from</i> different provenances