Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 39, Issue 12, 1228003(2019)

Inversion of Land Surface Emissivity in China Based on FY-2G Infrared Satellite Data

Lu Han1,2, Shengcheng Cui1、*, Shizhi Yang1, Wenqiang Lu1,2, Jianjun Shi1,2, and Qiang Zhao3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • 2Science Island Branch of Graduate School, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • 3School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    FY-2G IR1 channel data after cloud detection under Lambert projection on Oct 15, 2015, UTC 03:00
    Spectral response functions of FY-2G thermal infrared channels IR1 and IR2 and MODIS thermal infrared channels 31 and 32
    Temperature-independent thermal infrared spectral indices on Oct 15, 2015, UTC 19:00. (a) TTISIE,4,1 obtained by combining channel 4 with channel 1; (b) TTISIE,4,2 obtained by combining channel 4 with channel 2
    Inversion results of LSE. (a) LSE of FY-2G IR1(Oct 15, 2015, UTC 03:00); (b) LSE of FY-2G IR2(Oct 15, 2015, UTC 03:00); (c) LSE of FY-2G IR1(Oct 15, 2015, UTC 14:00); (d) LSE of FY-2G IR2(Oct 15, 2015, UTC 14:00)
    Difference between LSEs of FY-2G channels IR1 and IR2. (a) LSE difference at UTC 03:00 (daytime); (b) LSE difference at UTC 14:00 (nighttime)
    Cross-comparison verification error of MOD11B1 LSE and FY-2G LSE.(a) Comparison of LSEs of MODIS channel 31 and FY-2G IR1 at UTC 03:00; (b)comparison of LSEs of MODIS channel 32 and FY-2G IR2 at UTC 03:00; (c) comparison of LSEs of MODIS channel 31 and FY-2G IR1 at UTC 14:00;(d) comparison of LSEs of MODIS channel 32 and FY-2G IR2 at UTC 14:00
    Diurnal variation curves of average LSEs of FY-2G IR1 and IR2 and corresponding angle information. (a) Diurnal variation curves of average LSE of IR1 under six surface types; (b) diurnal variation curves of average LSE of IR2 under six surface types; (c) diurnal variation curves of average LSEs of IR1 and IR2 channels in China region; (d) difference between average LSEs of IR1 and IR2 channels under six surface types
    Difference in land surface bidirectional reflectance
    Difference in LSE of each channel. (a) Difference in LSE of channel IR4; (b) difference in LSE of channel IR1; (c) difference in LSE of channel IR2
    • Table 1. Fitting results of FY-2G IR channels IR1, IR2, and IR4

      View table

      Table 1. Fitting results of FY-2G IR channels IR1, IR2, and IR4

      FY-2G channelminiSSER2RMSE
      IR1(10.3-11.3 μm)4.859×10-114.5610.06717000.99980.014990
      IR2(11.662-12.662 μm)6.860×10-104.0810.04358000.99990.012070
      IR4(3.5-4.0 μm)4.565×10-3312.910.00092230.99980.001756
    • Table 2. Basic information of infrared channel parameters of FY-2G

      View table

      Table 2. Basic information of infrared channel parameters of FY-2G

      ChannelBand width /μmSNR@NE ΔTResolution /km
      IR110.3-11.30.2-0.4 K@300 K5
      IR211.662-12.6620.2-0.4 K@300 K5
      IR36.3-7.60.3-0.6 K@260 K5
      IR43.5-4.00.3-0.6 K@300 K5
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Lu Han, Shengcheng Cui, Shizhi Yang, Wenqiang Lu, Jianjun Shi, Qiang Zhao. Inversion of Land Surface Emissivity in China Based on FY-2G Infrared Satellite Data[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1228003

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Apr. 2, 2019

    Accepted: Jun. 11, 2019

    Published Online: Dec. 6, 2019

    The Author Email: Cui Shengcheng (csc@aiofm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS201939.1228003

    Topics