Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Truck Bumper Produced in the Algerian Auto Industry

Zahia KEBBOUCHE; Abdelaziz TAIRI; Brahim SAFI

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.04.006

Journal of Resources and Ecology, Volume. 11, Issue 4, 378(2020)

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Truck Bumper Produced in the Algerian Auto Industry

Zahia KEBBOUCHE^1,1, Abdelaziz TAIRI^1,1, and Brahim SAFI^2,2、*

¹Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Processes Engineering, Faculty of Hydrocarbons and Chemistry, University M’hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria

¹M'hamed Bougara大学碳氢化合物与化学学院化学与制药工艺工程系，布米尔达斯 35000, 阿尔及利亚

²Department of Engineering Process, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University M’hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria

²M'hamed Bougara大学工程科学学院工程过程系, 布米尔达斯 35000, 阿尔及利亚

show less

Figures & Tables(13)

Fig. 1. Fig. 1

Fig. 2. Fig. 2

Fig. 3. Fig. 3

Fig. 4. Fig. 4

Fig. 5. Fig. 5

Fig. 6. Fig. 6

Fig. 7. Fig. 7

Table 1.
Steel bumper component

View table

View in Article

Table 1.
Steel bumper component

Part number	Subset	Nature of sheet	Metal weight (kg)	Process	Operation range
668085 (A)	-	TC	14.10	55190 8 kW 6 bar	Cut flan, punch, smash, Notching, controlfold one edge R = B, fold R = 15, control
				55820 2 ch 6 bar
				55170 11 kW 6 bar
				56170, 56540, 56540
668086 (B) 668087 (C)	-	XES	0.866	55120, 56180, 56180	Cut blank, Cut out blank, Coining, Controlled
668088 (D)	668089 (D′)	XES	0.866	55120, 55820, 56180, 56180, 56540	Cut blank, Punch, Notch (4 angles), Fold, Control, Bend ends, Control
668088 (D)	663302 (D″)	XES	0.192	55190, 55820, 56180	Cut blank, Punch, Fold 2 edges, Control

Table 2.
Products used for surface treatments and painting (steel bumper)

View table

View in Article

Table 2.
Products used for surface treatments and painting (steel bumper)

Products	Major chemical constituents	Quantity
Systoclean 2118/504 (dégraissage)	Sodium hydroxide NaOH (C>10 %)	45 g
Addistrip 2252 (décappage)	Hydrochloric acid HCL (C>25 %)	0.5 L
Neutrax n°1	Sodium nitrate NaNO₃ (C>20 %)	20 g
Systophose 4605	Phosphoric acid (C>25 %)	0.020 L
Rinspas 19	Hydrofluozirconic acid and acid Fluozirconic	0.002 L
Water	H₂O	60 L

Table 3.
Materials used for the polyester bumper

View table

View in Article

Table 3.
Materials used for the polyester bumper

Products	Major chemical constituents	Quantity
Fiberglass layer	Fiberglass	1200 g m^-2
Resin	Polyester	2800 g
BUTANOX M-50	Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide PMC	56 g
Oc6	Cobalt octoate	56 g
Gel coat	Paint resin	448 g
Acetone	Diluent	Small quantity
Wax	Release fat	20 g

Table 4.
Chemical composition in cutting and preparation of fiberglass
View table
View in Article
Table 4.
Chemical composition in cutting and preparation of fiberglass
Chemical composition Concentration (%)
MgO 1.141
Al₂O₃ 10.298
SiO₂ 44.161
SO₃ 0.764
K₂O 0.476
CaO 35.048
Fe₂O₃ 1.872

Table 5.
Chemical composition in deburring finished part
View table
View in Article
Table 5.
Chemical composition in deburring finished part
Chemical composition Concentration (%)
MgO 0.230
Al₂O₃ 1.775
SiO₂ 7.314
P₂O₅ 0.910
SO₃ 0.118
K₂O 0.118
CaO 7.488
TiO₂ 0.630
Fe₂O₃ 0.448
Cl 13.770

Table 6.
Chemical composition in finishing part
View table
View in Article
Table 6.
Chemical composition in finishing part
Chemical composition Concentration (%)
Cr₂O₃ 0.010
MgO 0.087
Al₂O₃ 0.598
SiO₂ 2.656
P₂O₅ 0.460
SO₃ 0.088
CaO 4.498
TiO₂ 0.371
Fe₂O₃ 0.698
PbO 3.673
Cl 8.981

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Zahia KEBBOUCHE, Abdelaziz TAIRI, Brahim SAFI. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Truck Bumper Produced in the Algerian Auto Industry[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(4): 378

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites