High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 13, Issue 3, 03000e39(2025)

Machine learning phase control of filled-aperture coherent beam combining: principle and numerical demonstration

Hongbing Zhou1,2, Rumao Tao1、*, Xi Feng1, Haoyu Zhang1, Min Li1, Xiong Xin1, Yuyang Peng1, Honghuan Lin1, Jianjun Wang1, Lixin Yan2, and Feng Jing1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, China
  • 2Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    System setup of deep learning phase control for filled-aperture CBC.
    Structure chart of the VGG network.
    Testing loss with respect to the training epoch.
    Predicted phase versus true phase for samples of different initial RMS residual phases: (a) 0.7 rad, (b) 1.2 rad, (c) 1.8 rad and (d) 2.4 rad.
    Prediction error as a function of true phase: (a) cos-sin loss and two-layer output and (b) traditional MSE loss and one-layer output.
    System state variation during delay control process: (a) PIB of the tiled-aperture combined beam and (b) normalized intensity of the filled-aperture combined beam.
    Single-step phase control of filled-aperture CBC.
    Single-step residual phase for filled-aperture CBC and combining efficiency for tiled-aperture CBC with respect to training epochs.
    Filled-aperture CBC with dynamic phase noise: (a) time-dependent phase noise, (b) combining efficiency in open and closed loops, (c) time convergence detail from the open to the closed loop and (d) phase noise spectra in open and closed loops.
    Filled-aperture CBC of 36 channels with dynamic phase noise. Phase control by deep learning (a) with and (b) without strategies.
    • Table 1. Procedure for delay control.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Procedure for delay control.

      Require: Parameters Tp, Td, γ and σ are defined.
      1:for step = 1 to ∞ do
      2:capture an image and feed into neural network
      3:update phases φφφpred
      4:calculate delay control step s = step·Tp/(Td/3)
      5:if (s modulo 3) = 1 then
      6:generate random vector δτ of variance σ2
      7:apply positive perturbation τ + δτ
      8:get PD signal as metric J+ = IPD (τ + δτ)
      9:else if (s modulo 3) = 2 then
      10:apply negative perturbation τδτ
      11:get PD signal as metric J = IPD (τδτ)
      12:else
      13:calculate metric change: ΔJ = (J+J)/(J+ + J)
      14:update delays ττ + γδτΔJ / σ2
      15:end if
      16:end for
    • Table 2. Residual phase after one-step phase control for different channel numbers.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Residual phase after one-step phase control for different channel numbers.

      N9162536
      Dataset size18,00032,00050,00072,000
      Training epochs90160250360
      Training time (h)0.601.864.529.37
      One-step time (ms)1.11.11.01.0
      φres of this networkλ/70λ/43λ/27λ/21
      φres of traditional networkλ/12λ/4λ/4λ/4
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hongbing Zhou, Rumao Tao, Xi Feng, Haoyu Zhang, Min Li, Xiong Xin, Yuyang Peng, Honghuan Lin, Jianjun Wang, Lixin Yan, Feng Jing. Machine learning phase control of filled-aperture coherent beam combining: principle and numerical demonstration[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(3): 03000e39

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Dec. 8, 2024

    Accepted: Mar. 3, 2025

    Posted: Mar. 4, 2025

    Published Online: Jun. 24, 2025

    The Author Email: Rumao Tao (supertaozhi@163.com)

    DOI:10.1017/hpl.2025.24

    CSTR:32185.14.hpl.2025.24

    Topics