High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 13, Issue 3, 03000e39(2025)
Machine learning phase control of filled-aperture coherent beam combining: principle and numerical demonstration
Fig. 1. System setup of deep learning phase control for filled-aperture CBC.
Fig. 4. Predicted phase versus true phase for samples of different initial RMS residual phases: (a) 0.7 rad, (b) 1.2 rad, (c) 1.8 rad and (d) 2.4 rad.
Fig. 5. Prediction error as a function of true phase: (a) cos-sin loss and two-layer output and (b) traditional MSE loss and one-layer output.
Fig. 6. System state variation during delay control process: (a) PIB of the tiled-aperture combined beam and (b) normalized intensity of the filled-aperture combined beam.
Fig. 8. Single-step residual phase for filled-aperture CBC and combining efficiency for tiled-aperture CBC with respect to training epochs.
Fig. 9. Filled-aperture CBC with dynamic phase noise: (a) time-dependent phase noise, (b) combining efficiency in open and closed loops, (c) time convergence detail from the open to the closed loop and (d) phase noise spectra in open and closed loops.
Fig. 10. Filled-aperture CBC of 36 channels with dynamic phase noise. Phase control by deep learning (a) with and (b) without strategies.
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Hongbing Zhou, Rumao Tao, Xi Feng, Haoyu Zhang, Min Li, Xiong Xin, Yuyang Peng, Honghuan Lin, Jianjun Wang, Lixin Yan, Feng Jing. Machine learning phase control of filled-aperture coherent beam combining: principle and numerical demonstration[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(3): 03000e39
Category: Research Articles
Received: Dec. 8, 2024
Accepted: Mar. 3, 2025
Posted: Mar. 4, 2025
Published Online: Jun. 24, 2025
The Author Email: Rumao Tao (supertaozhi@163.com)
CSTR:32185.14.hpl.2025.24