Photonics Research, Volume. 12, Issue 4, 608(2024)
From non-scattering to super-scattering with Mie-tronics Editors' Pick
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the formation of a hybrid anapole state within an all-dielectric cuboid meta-atom with the width and height of
Fig. 2. Normalized total scattering cross-section of the cuboid meta-atom as a function of (a) height and (b) width and an operating wavelength under plane-wave illumination in logarithmic scale. The contribution of ED, MD, and EQ multipolar moments excited in the meta-atom as a function of (c) height and (d) width with respect to wavelength. By changing the topology of the meta-atom, several resonances emerge and disappear at certain spectral positions, leading to the formation of resonant branches that shift toward longer wavelengths as the size of the meta-atom increases.
Fig. 3. Explicit contributions of amplitude and phase of primitive and toroidal moments as functions of height and wavelength for (a), (b) ED; (c), (d) MD; and (e), (f) EQ. An anapole of any kind is excited in regions wherein both conditions are simultaneously satisfied. The vertical dashed line corresponds to the dimension at which the HA state can be excited up to the EQA at the operating wavelength of
Fig. 4. Calculated amplitudes and phase differences between the primitive and toroidal contributions of a cuboid meta-atom with
Fig. 5. (a) Normalized total scattering cross-section of the cuboid meta-atom under plane wave incidence with the angles
Fig. 6. Schematic demonstration of achieving bianisotropic responses via breaking the inversion symmetry of the meta-atom. For (a) symmetric particles, the eigenmodes consist of either only even or odd multipoles, while for (b) asymmetric meta-atoms, the optical response consists of multipoles of mixed parities. (c) Calculated response of the pyramid meta-atom with respect to the top-to-bottom width ratio and operating wavelength. Four various points corresponding to different values of
Fig. 7. Calculated amplitudes and phase differences between the electric primitive and first- and second-type toroidal multipoles of a cuboid meta-atom with
Fig. 8. Real (blue line) and imaginary (red curve) parts of polysilicon refractive index.
Fig. 9. Contribution of MQ moment excited within the cuboid scatterer as a function of (a) height and (b) width with respect to wavelength. Changing the height of the meta-atom has a negligible effect on the MQ response, while the variation of its width can significantly shift the scattering response. (c), (d) Contributions of both primitive and toroidal MQ multipole moments as functions of height and wavelength. At the spectral position wherein the optical response of the meta-atom is mainly governed by higher-order anapole states up to EQA (shown with black dashed lines), the conditions for satisfying magnetic quadrupole anapole are not fulfilled.
Fig. 10. Explicit dynamics of (a) amplitude and (b) phase of primitive and toroidal contributions as functions of height and wavelength for ED, MD, EQ, and MQ. An anapole of any kind is excited in regions wherein both conditions are simultaneously satisfied. The vertical dashed line corresponds to the dimension at which the HA state can be excited up to the EQA at the operating wavelength of
Fig. 11. (a) Evolution of the scattering cross-section under the continuous change of the diameter-to-height aspect ratio. (b) Multipole decomposition and (c) stored energy spectra for a cylindrical particle with
Fig. 12. Calculated total scattering cross-section (blue color) and stored energy (red color) of two meta-atoms supporting HA (solid line) and first-order EDA (dashed curve) as a function of the operating wavelength. The scattered field’s
Fig. 13. Calculated scattering cross-sections of the cuboid meta-atom for (a) ED, (b) MD, (c) EQ, and (d) MQ multipole moments as functions of
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Hooman Barati Sedeh, Natalia M. Litchinitser, "From non-scattering to super-scattering with Mie-tronics," Photonics Res. 12, 608 (2024)
Category: Physical Optics
Received: Aug. 14, 2023
Accepted: Nov. 8, 2023
Published Online: Mar. 12, 2024
The Author Email: Natalia M. Litchinitser (natalia.litchinitser@duke.edu)
CSTR:32188.14.PRJ.503182