[2] XING J T. Developments of numerical methods for linear and nonlinear fluid-solid interaction dynamics with applications[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 46, 201602(2016).

[4] HOU G N, WANG J, LAYTON A. Numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction—a review[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 12, 337-377(2012).

[5] MICHLER C, HULSHOFF S J, VAN BRUMMELEN E H et al. A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction[J]. Computers & Fluids, 33, 839-848(2004).

[6] LONGATTE E, VERREMAN V, SOULI M. Time marching for simulation of fluid–structure interaction problems[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 25, 95-111(2009).

[7] PIPERNO S. Explicit/implicit fluid/structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2D inviscid aeroelastic simulations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 25, 1207-1226(1997).

[8] FARHAT C, LESOINNE M. Two efficient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 182, 499-515(2000).

[9] LE TALLEC P, MOURO J. Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190, 3039-3067(2001).

[10] WANG S, KHOO B C, LIU G R et al. Coupling GSM/ALE with ES-FEM-T3 for fluid–deformable structure interactions[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 276, 315-340(2014).

[14] FU S X, MOAN T, CHEN X J et al. Hydroelastic analysis of flexible floating interconnected structures[J]. Ocean Engineering, 34, 1516-1531(2007).

[15] WEI W, FU S X, MOAN T et al. A time-domain method for hydroelasticity of very large floating structures in inhomogeneous sea conditions[J]. Marine Structures, 57, 180-192(2018).

[16] [16] NOH W F. CEL: a timedependent twospacedimensional coupled EulerianLagrangian code[M]ALDER B, FERNBACH S, ROTENBERG M. Methods in Computational Physics, Volume 3, Fundamental Methods in Hydrodynamics. New Yk: Academic Press, 1964: 117–179.

[17] DETTMER W, PERIĆ D. A computational framework for free surface fluid flows accounting for surface tension[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195, 3038-3071(2006).

[18] HUGHES T J R, LIU W K, ZIMMERMANN T K. Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 29, 329-349(1981).

[19] DONEA J, GIULIANI S, HALLEUX J P. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 33, 689-723(1982).

[20] BELYTSCHKO T, FLANAGAN D P, KENNEDY J M. Finite element methods with user-controlled meshes for fluid-structure interaction[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 33, 669-688(1982).

[24] DU Y, WANG C X, ZHANG N. Numerical simulation on coupled ship motions with nonlinear sloshing[J]. Ocean Engineering, 178, 493-500(2019).

[25] KARGBO O, XUE M A, ZHENG J H et al. Multiphase sloshing dynamics of a two-layered fluid and interfacial wave interaction with a porous T-shaped baffle in a tank[J]. Ocean Engineering, 229, 108664(2021).

[27] WANG Y, QIN Y Z, YAO X L. A combined experimental and numerical investigation on damage characteristics of ice sheet subjected to underwater explosion load[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 103, 102347(2020).

[29] SHI Y, PAN G, YAN G X et al. Numerical study on the cavity characteristics and impact loads of AUV water entry[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 89, 44-58(2019).

[30] XIANG T, ISTRATI D. Assessment of extreme wave impact on coastal decks with different geometries via the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, 1342(2021).

[32] [32] TEZDUYAR T E, TAKIZAWA K, KURAISHI T. Spacetime computational FSI flow analysis: 2004 beyond[M]ALDAKHEEL F, HUDOBIVNIK B, SOLEIMANI M, et al. Current Trends Open Problems in Computational Mechanics. Cham: Springer, 2022: 537–544.

[33] TAKIZAWA K, BAZILEVS Y, TEZDUYAR T E. Mesh moving methods in flow computations with the space-time and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods[J]. Journal of Advanced Engineering and Computation, 6, 85-112(2022).

[34] WU Q G, NI B Y, XUE Y Z et al. Experimental and numerical study of free water exit and re-entry of a fully submerged buoyant spheroid[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 76, 110-124(2018).

[35] FENG S, ZHANG G Y, WAN D C et al. On the treatment of hydroelastic slamming by coupling boundary element method and modal superposition method[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 112, 102595(2021).

[36] HUANG X, HU H B, ZHANG A M et al. Simulation of the early stage water flooding through an opening using boundary element method[J]. Ocean Engineering, 186, 106086(2019).

[37] TANG Y, SUN S L, REN H L. Numerical investigation on a container ship navigating in irregular waves by a fully nonlinear time domain method[J]. Ocean Engineering, 223, 108705(2021).

[38] SUN S Y, WU G X, XU G. Breaking wave impact on a floating body with air bubble effect[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 82, 16-34(2018).

[40] TIAN Z L, LIU Y L, ZHANG A M et al. Analysis of breaking and re-closure of a bubble near a free surface based on the Eulerian finite element method[J]. Computers & Fluids, 170, 41-52(2018).

[41] WANG S, GUEDES SOARES C. Review of ship slamming loads and responses[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 16, 427-445(2017).

[42] PESKIN C S. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 10, 252-271(1972).

[43] MITTAL R, IACCARINO G. Immersed boundary methods[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 37, 239-261(2005).

[44] HOU T Y, SHI Z Q. Removing the stiffness of elastic force from the immersed boundary method for the 2D Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 9138-9169(2008).

[45] HOU T Y, SHI Z Q. An efficient semi-implicit immersed boundary method for the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 8968-8991(2008).

[46] [46] MOHDYUSOF J. Combined immersed boundaryBspline methods f simulations of flow in complex geometries[R]. Stanfd: NASA Ames Research Center, 1997: 317327.

[47] KIRKPATRICK M P, ARMFIELD S W, KENT J H. A representation of curved boundaries for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on a staggered three-dimensional Cartesian grid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 184, 1-36(2003).

[48] CHENY Y, BOTELLA O. The LS-STAG method: a new immersed boundary/level-set method for the computation of incompressible viscous flows in complex moving geometries with good conservation properties[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 229, 1043-1076(2010).

[49] MEYER M, DEVESA A, HICKEL S et al. A conservative immersed interface method for large-eddy simulation of incompressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 229, 6300-6317(2010).

[50] LEVEQUE R J, LI Z L. Immersed interface methods for Stokes flow with elastic boundaries or surface tension[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 18, 709-735(1997).

[51] LEVEQUE R J, LI Z L. The immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 31, 1019-1044(1994).

[52] LIU W K, KIM D W, TANG S Q. Mathematical foundations of the immersed finite element method[J]. Computational Mechanics, 39, 211-222(2007).

[53] ZHANG L, GERSTENBERGER A, WANG X D et al. Immersed finite element method[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193, 2051-2067(2004).

[54] JIANG C, YAO J Y, ZHANG Z Q et al. A sharp-interface immersed smoothed finite element method for interactions between incompressible flows and large deformation solids[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 340, 24-53(2018).

[55] ZHANG Z Q, LIU G R, KHOO B C. Immersed smoothed finite element method for two dimensional fluid-structure interaction problems[J]. International Journal For Numerical Methods in Engineering, 90, 1292-1320(2012).

[56] WANG S Q, ZHANG G Y, ZHANG Z Q et al. An immersed smoothed point interpolation method (IS‐PIM) for fluid‐structure interaction problems[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 85, 213-234(2017).

[57] YAN B Q, WANG S Q, ZHANG G Y et al. A sharp-interface immersed smoothed point interpolation method with improved mass conservation for fluid-structure interaction problems[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 32, 267-285(2020).

[58] WANG S Q, HUANG S, ZHANG G Y et al. A three-dimensional hybrid immersed smoothed point interpolation method for fluid-structure interactions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 248, 110838(2022).

[59] GLOWINSKI R, PAN T W, PERIAUX J. A fictitious domain method for external incompressible viscous flow modeled by Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 112, 133-148(1994).

[60] YU Z S, SHAO X M. A direct-forcing fictitious domain method for particulate flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 227, 292-314(2007).

[63] MA L, LI T Q. An RBF-based h-adaptive cartesian grid refinement method for arbitrary single/multi-body hull modeling and reconstruction[J]. Symmetry, 13, 15(2020).

[64] ANGELIDIS D, CHAWDHARY S, SOTIROPOULOS F. Unstructured cartesian refinement with sharp interface immersed boundary method for 3D unsteady incompressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 325, 272-300(2016).

[65] WANG S Z, SHI B J, LI Y H et al. A large eddy simulation of flows around an underwater vehicle model using an immersed boundary method[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 6, 302-305(2016).

[66] ZHAO J Z, MAO Q A, PAN G et al. Hydrodynamic benefit of cephalic fins in a self-propelled flexible manta ray[J]. Physics of Fluids, 33, 081906(2021).

[67] ZHAO J Z, MAO Q A, PAN G et al. Hydrodynamic benefit of impulsive bursting in a self-propelled flexible plate[J]. Physics of Fluids, 33, 111904(2021).

[68] LI W Z, WANG W Q, YAN Y et al. Effects of pitching motion profile on energy harvesting performance of a semi-active flapping foil using immersed boundary method[J]. Ocean Engineering, 163, 94-106(2018).

[69] CAI Y N, LU J H, LI S. Direct simulation of acoustic scattering problems involving fluid-structure interaction using an efficient immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144, 2256-2268(2018).

[71] XIAO Y C, ZHANG G Y, HUI D et al. Numerical simulation for water entry and exit of rigid bodies based on the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 109, 103486(2022).

[72] DE ROSIS A, TAFUNI A. A phase-field lattice Boltzmann method for the solution of water-entry and water-exit problems[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 37, 832-847(2022).

[73] HAO H H, YU J Y, SONG Y P et al. Deformation and regimes of liquid column during water exit of a partially submerged sphere using the front-tracking lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 99, 103152(2020).

[74] CHEN G Q, HUANG X, ZHANG A M et al. Three-dimensional simulation of a rising bubble in the presence of spherical obstacles by the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Physics of Fluids, 31, 097104(2019).

[75] HENDRICKSON K, WEYMOUTH G D, YU X M et al. Wake behind a three-dimensional dry transom stern. Part 1: flow structure and large-scale air entrainment[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 875, 854-883(2019).

[76] HENDRICKSON K, YUE D K P. Wake behind a three-dimensional dry transom stern. Part 2: analysis and modelling of incompressible highly variable density turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 875, 884-913(2019).

[77] SUGIYAMA K, II S, TAKEUCHI S et al. A full Eulerian finite difference approach for solving fluid-structure coupling problems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 230, 596-627(2011).

[78] II S, GONG X B, SUGIYAMA K et al. A full Eulerian fluid-membrane coupling method with a smoothed volume-of-fluid approach[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 12, 544-576(2012).

[79] LIU N N, ZHANG A M, LIU Y L et al. Numerical analysis of the interaction of two underwater explosion bubbles using the compressible Eulerian finite-element method[J]. Physics of Fluids, 32, 046107(2020).

[80] XU L Y, WANG S P, LIU Y L et al. Numerical simulation on the whole process of an underwater explosion between a deformable seabed and a free surface[J]. Ocean Engineering, 219, 108311(2021).

[81] SHIMADA T, NISHIGUCHI K, BALE R et al. Eulerian finite volume formulation using Lagrangian marker particles for incompressible fluid-structure interaction problems[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 123, 1294-1328(2022).

[82] HUANG Q G, ZHANG D, PAN G. Computational model construction and analysis of the hydrodynamics of a Rhinoptera Javanica[J]. IEEE Access, 8, 30410-30420(2020).

[83] HAN P, PAN Y, LIU G et al. Propulsive performance and vortex wakes of multiple tandem foils pitching in-line[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 108, 103422(2022).

[84] KIM W, CHOI H. Immersed boundary methods for fluid-structure interaction: a review[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 75, 301-309(2019).

[85] WANG X S, ZHANG L T. Interpolation functions in the immersed boundary and finite element methods[J]. Computational Mechanics, 45, 321-334(2010).

[86] SUZUKI K, INAMURO T. Effect of internal mass in the simulation of a moving body by the immersed boundary method[J]. Computers & Fluids, 49, 173-187(2011).

[87] CAI Y N, LU J H, WANG S Q et al. A Lagrangian point approximation-based immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method for FSI problems involving deformable body[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods, 19, 2150070(2022).

[88] HOU Z, SUN T Z, QUAN X B et al. Large eddy simulation and experimental investigation on the cavity dynamics and vortex evolution for oblique water entry of a cylinder[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 81, 76-92(2018).

[94] JIANG C Q, EL MOCTAR O, SCHELLIN T E. Mooring-configurations induced decay motions of a buoy[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, 350(2021).

[95] HUANG S, LIU W Q, LUO W Z et al. Numerical simulation of the motion of a large scale unmanned surface vessel in high sea state waves[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, 982(2021).

[96] WANG J H, WAN D C. CFD investigations of ship maneuvering in waves using naoe-FOAM-SJTU solver[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 17, 443-458(2018).

[99] ZHOU B, LIU H, ZHANG G Y et al. Numerical simulation of cavity dynamics and motion characteristics for water entry of a hydrophobic sphere at various speeds and angles[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 146, 04020091(2020).

[100] ZHANG G Y, HOU Z, SUN T Z et al. Numerical simulation of the effect of waves on cavity dynamics for oblique water entry of a cylinder[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 32, 1178-1190(2020).

[101] CHEN C W, WANG T X, FENG Z et al. Simulation research on water-entry impact force of an autonomous underwater helicopter[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 25, 1166-1181(2020).

[102] GAO S, SHI Y, PAN G et al. Research on the effect of asymmetric bubbles on the load characteristics of projectiles during an underwater salvo[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 124, 103212(2022).

[104] YE H X, WAN D C. Benchmark computations for flows around a stationary cylinder with high Reynolds numbers by RANS-overset grid approach[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 65, 315-326(2017).

[105] YANG H, HE G H, MO W J et al. Energy extraction performance of tandem ground-effect hydrofoils[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 809, 012001(2021).

[106] WINDT C, DAVIDSON J, CHANDAR D D J et al. Evaluation of the overset grid method for control studies of wave energy converters in OpenFOAM numerical wave tanks[J]. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, 6, 55-70(2020).

[107] HUANG Y N, WANG W H, LIU J et al. Special motion characteristic of wind turbine installation vessel in waves[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods, 17, 1940007(2020).

[108] TRAN T T, KIM D H. A CFD study of coupled aerodynamic-hydrodynamic loads on a semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine[J]. Wind Energy, 21, 70-85(2018).

[109] SADAT-HOSSEINI H, KIM D H, CARRICA P M et al. URANS simulations for a flooded ship in calm water and regular beam waves[J]. Ocean Engineering, 120, 318-330(2016).

[110] SUN T Z, ZHOU L, YIN Z H et al. Cavitation bubble dynamics and structural loads of high-speed water entry of a cylinder using fluid-structure interaction method[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 101, 102285(2020).

[111] [111] CHENG P, WAN D C, HU C H. Numerical simulations of flows around floating offshe wind turbine[C]The 28th International Ocean Polar Engineering Conference. Sappo: OnePetro, 2018.

[112] LUO M, KHAYYER A, LIN P Z. Particle methods in ocean and coastal engineering[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 114, 102734(2021).

[113] YANG Q, JONES V, MCCUE L. Free-surface flow interactions with deformable structures using an SPH-FEM model[J]. Ocean Engineering, 55, 136-147(2012).

[114] ZHANG Y L, WAN D C. MPS-FEM coupled method for sloshing flows in an elastic tank[J]. Ocean Engineering, 152, 416-427(2018).

[115] HU T A, WANG S Q, ZHANG G Y et al. Numerical simulations of sloshing flows with an elastic baffle using a SPH-SPIM coupled method[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 93, 101950(2019).

[116] ZHANG Z L, KHALID M S U, LONG T et al. Investigations on sloshing mitigation using elastic baffles by coupling smoothed finite element method and decoupled finite particle method[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 94, 102942(2020).

[117] HWANG S C, PARK J C, GOTOH H et al. Numerical simulations of sloshing flows with elastic baffles by using a particle-based fluid–structure interaction analysis method[J]. Ocean Engineering, 118, 227-241(2016).

[119] SUN Z, DJIDJELI K, XING J T et al. Coupled MPS-modal superposition method for 2D nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problems with free surface[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 61, 295-323(2016).

[120] SUN P N, LE TOUZÉ D, OGER G et al. An accurate FSI-SPH modeling of challenging fluid-structure interaction problems in two and three dimensions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 221, 108552(2021).

[121] NASAR A M A, ROGERS B D, REVELL A et al. Eulerian weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with the immersed boundary method for thin slender bodies[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 84, 263-282(2019).

[122] ZHAN L, PENG C, ZHANG B Y et al. A stabilized TL-WC SPH approach with GPU acceleration for three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 86, 329-353(2019).

[123] ZHU Y J, ZHANG C, YU Y C et al. A CAD-compatible body-fitted particle generator for arbitrarily complex geometry and its application to wave-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 33, 195-206(2021).

[124] SUN W K, ZHANG L W, LIEW K M. A smoothed particle hydrodynamics-peridynamics coupling strategy for modeling fluid-structure interaction problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 371, 113298(2020).

[125] KHAYYER A, SHIMIZU Y, GOTOH H et al. A coupled incompressible SPH-Hamiltonian SPH solver for hydroelastic FSI corresponding to composite structures[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 94, 242-271(2021).

[126] GREEN M D, ZHOU Y P, DOMINGUEZ J M et al. Smooth particle hydrodynamics simulations of long-duration violent three-dimensional sloshing in tanks[J]. Ocean Engineering, 229, 108925(2021).

[127] CAO X Y, TAO L, ZHANG A M et al. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) model for coupled analysis of a damaged ship with internal sloshing in beam seas[J]. Physics of Fluids, 31, 032103(2019).

[128] JOSHI S, FRANC J P, GHIGLIOTTI G et al. SPH modelling of a cavitation bubble collapse near an elasto-visco-plastic material[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 125, 420-439(2019).

[129] SUN P N, LE TOUZÉ D, OGER G et al. An accurate SPH volume adaptive scheme for modeling strongly-compressible multiphase flows. Part 1: numerical scheme and validations with basic 1D and 2D benchmarks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 426, 109937(2021).

[130] SUN P N, LE TOUZÉ D, OGER G et al. An accurate SPH volume adaptive scheme for modeling strongly-compressible multiphase flows. Part 2: extension of the scheme to cylindrical coordinates and simulations of 3D axisymmetric problems with experimental validations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 426, 109936(2021).

[131] CHEN X, WAN D C. GPU accelerated MPS method for large-scale 3-D violent free surface flows[J]. Ocean Engineering, 171, 677-694(2019).

[133] SUN Z, ZHANG G Y, ZONG Z et al. Numerical analysis of violent hydroelastic problems based on a mixed MPS-mode superposition method[J]. Ocean Engineering, 179, 285-297(2019).

[134] SUN Z, JIANG Y C, ZHANG G Y et al. Slamming load on trimaran cross section with rigid and flexible arches[J]. Marine Structures, 66, 227-241(2019).

[135] JANDAGHIAN M, KRIMI A, SHAKIBAEINIA A. Enhanced weakly-compressible MPS method for immersed granular flows[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 152, 103908(2021).

[136] SUN Y J, XI G, SUN Z G. A generic smoothed wall boundary in multi-resolution particle method for fluid-structure interaction problem[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 378, 113726(2021).

[137] TSURUTA N, KHAYYER A, GOTOH H et al. Development of wavy interface model for wave generation by the projection-based particle methods[J]. Coastal Engineering, 165, 103861(2021).

[138] ZHANG G Y, WU J X, SUN Z et al. Numerically simulated flooding of a freely-floating two-dimensional damaged ship section using an improved MPS method[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 101, 102207(2020).

[139] WEN X, ZHAO W W, WAN D C. A multiphase MPS method for bubbly flows with complex interfaces[J]. Ocean Engineering, 238, 109743(2021).

[140] LIU M B, ZHANG Z L. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for modeling fluid-structure interactions[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 62, 984701(2019).

[141] GOTOH H, KHAYYER A. On the state-of-the-art of particle methods for coastal and ocean engineering[J]. Coastal Engineering Journal, 60, 79-103(2018).

[143] ZHANG A M, SUN P N, MING F R et al. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and its applications in fluid-structure interactions[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 29, 187-216(2017).

[144] DOMÍNGUEZ J M, CRESPO A J C, HALL M et al. SPH simulation of floating structures with moorings[J]. Coastal Engineering, 153, 103560(2019).

[146] VACONDIO R, ALTOMARE C, DE LEFFE et al. Grand challenges for smoothed particle hydrodynamics numerical schemes[J]. Computational Particle Mechanics, 8, 575-588(2021).