Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 18, Issue 2, 160(2023)
Optimization of the section structure of container ship based on artificial bee colony algorithm and finite element strength calculation
Figures & Tables(13)
![[in Chinese]](/Images/icon/loading.gif){kind=icon}
Table 1. Principle for variables selection range
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Principle for variables selection range
变量 下限 上限 nu nu0−2 nu0+2 t 0.5t0 1.5t0 h 0.5h0 2h0 t1 0.5t10 1.5t10 l 0.5l0 2l0 t2 0.5t20 1.5t20
Table 2. Design variables and optimization results for midship bottom area
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Design variables and optimization results for midship bottom area
设计变量 优化前 规范优化后 变化率/% 有限元优化后 变化率/% 内底板厚/mm 14 11.5 −17.9 11.0 −21.4 上下型材数量/个 1 1 0 1 0 内底型材/mm 160×10.0 140×12.5 +9.4 140×9.5 −16.9 中底桁厚度/mm 13.0 11.5 −11.5 11.0 −15.4 外底板厚/mm 18.0 17.5 −2.8 15.5 −13.9 外底型材/mm 240×10.0 220×12.5 +14.6 220×9.5 −12.9
Table 3. Design variables and optimization results for lateral bottom area
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Design variables and optimization results for lateral bottom area
设计变量 优化前 规范优化后 变化率/% 有限元优化后 变化率/% 内底板厚/mm 14 12 −14.3 11 −21.4 上下型材数量/个 2 3 +50.0 3 +50.0 内底型材/mm 260×11 250×10 −12.6 250×10 −12.6 旁底桁厚度/mm 11.5 9.0 −21.7 9.5 −17.4 旁底桁型材数量/个 2 2 0 1 −50.0 旁底桁型材/mm×mm 160×11.5 140×10.0 −23.9 140×10.5 −20.1 外底板厚/mm 16.0 15.5 −3.1 13.5 −15.6 外底型材/mm 300×11 270×10 −18.2 270×10 −18.2
Table 4. Design variables and optimization results for bilge area
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Design variables and optimization results for bilge area
设计变量 优化前 规范优化后 变化率/% 有限元优化后 变化率/% 舭部外板厚/mm 15 11 −26.7 12 −20.0 垂直交叉板厚/mm 8.0 7.5 −6.3 6.5 −18.8 型材数量/个 4 3 −25.0 2 −50.0 竖直板型材/mm 280×11.5 270×10.0 −16.1 260×10.5 −15.2 水平板型材/mm 270×11.0 300×11.0 +11.1 240×9.5 −23.2
Table 5. Design variables and optimization results for upper side area
View tableView in ArticleTable 5. Design variables and optimization results for upper side area
设计变量 优化前 规范优化后 变化率/% 有限元优化后 变化率/% 各甲板型材数量/个 2 1 −50.0 1 −50.0 主甲板板厚/mm 20 19 −5.0 19 −5.0 甲板型材/mm 400×11.0 365×11.0 −8.8 380×9.5 −18.0 舷侧外板板厚/mm 16 15 −6.3 13 −18.8 舷侧内板板厚/mm 12.0 12.0 0 11.5 −4.2 舷侧型材数量/个 4 3 −25.0 4 0 舷侧型材/mm 260×13.0 280×10.5 −13.0 240×11.5 −18.3
Table 6. Design variables and optimization results for midship side area
View tableView in ArticleTable 6. Design variables and optimization results for midship side area
设计变量 优化前 规范优化后 变化率/% 有限元优化后 变化率/% 二级甲板板厚/mm 10.0 11.5 +15.0 8.5 −15.0 甲板型材/mm 200×11.0 200×11.0 0 200×9.5 −13.6 舷侧外板板厚/mm 14.0 12.0 −14.3 11.5 −17.9 舷侧内板板厚/mm 11.5 11.5 0 8.5 −26.1 舷侧型材数量/个 5 4 −20.0 4 −20.0 舷侧型材/mm 230×13.0 230×10.5 −19.2 230×11.5 −11.5
Table 7. Design variables and optimization results for lower side area
View tableView in ArticleTable 7. Design variables and optimization results for lower side area
设计变量 优化前 规范优化后 变化率/% 有限元优化后 变化率/% 三级甲板板厚/mm 8 10.5 +31.3 9.0 +12.5 甲板型材/mm 270×11.0 300×11.0 +11.1 240×9.5 −23.2 舷侧外板板厚/mm 13.0 11.5 −11.5 12.0 −7.7 舷侧内板板厚/mm 11.5 11.0 −4.3 9.0 −21.7 舷侧型材数量/个 5 5 0 3 −40.0 舷侧型材/mm 220×13.0 230×10.5 −15.6 250×11.5 +0.5
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Wenping LUO, Weiqin LIU, Hongxu WANG, Meng YANG. Optimization of the section structure of container ship based on artificial bee colony algorithm and finite element strength calculation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(2): 160
Paper Information
Category: Ship Structure and Fittings
Received: Sep. 15, 2021
Accepted: --
Published Online: Mar. 20, 2025
The Author Email:
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20