Advanced Photonics Nexus, Volume. 3, Issue 5, 056006(2024)

Deep learning phase recovery: data-driven, physics-driven, or a combination of both? Editors' Pick , Author Presentation

Kaiqiang Wang* and Edmund Y. Lam*
Author Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hong Kong, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Phase recovery network training with DD and PD strategies.
    Description of DD deep learning phase recovery methods.
    Description of PD deep learning phase recovery methods. (a) Network inference for the uPD. (b) Network training and inference for the tPD. (c) Network training and inference for the tPDr.
    Inference results of DD, uPD, tPD, and tPDr.
    Results of DD, tPD, and CD. The blue box represents low-frequency information and the green box represents high-frequency information.
    Cross-inference results of DD and tPD for the datasets of ImageNet, LFW, and MNIST. The metric below each result is the average SSIM for that testing dataset.
    Ill-posedness adaptability test of DD and tPD. Blue part represents a single hologram as the network input, red part represents a single hologram with aperture constraints as the network input, and yellow part represents multiple holograms as the network input.
    Dataset generation and network training for the case of imaging aberration.
    Prior capacity test of DD and tPD.
    Experimental tests of DD, tPD, CD, and uPD(tPDr). (a) Inference results of one field of view. (b) Inference results of another field of view.
    • Table 1. Summary of DD, uPD, tPD, and tPDr.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Summary of DD, uPD, tPD, and tPDr.

      StrategyPhysics requirementDataset requirementInference cyclesLearning mode
      DDNoHologram-phase datasetOne timeSupervised
      uPDNumerical propagationNoMulti timesSelf-supervised
      tPDNumerical propagationHologram-only datasetOne timeSelf-supervised
      tPDrNumerical propagationHologram-only datasetMulti timesSelf-supervised
    • Table 2. Training settings and inference evaluation of DD, uPD, tPD, and tPDr.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Training settings and inference evaluation of DD, uPD, tPD, and tPDr.

      StrategyTraining datasetsInference cyclesInference time (s)PSNR SSIM
      DD10,000 pairs10.0219.90.68
      uPD010,00080025.60.94
      tPD10,000 inputs10.0218.50.69
      tPDr10,000 inputs10008025.10.93
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kaiqiang Wang, Edmund Y. Lam, "Deep learning phase recovery: data-driven, physics-driven, or a combination of both?," Adv. Photon. Nexus 3, 056006 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: May. 9, 2024

    Accepted: Aug. 12, 2024

    Published Online: Sep. 18, 2024

    The Author Email: Wang Kaiqiang (kqwang.optics@gmail.com), Lam Edmund Y. (elam@eee.hku.hk)

    DOI:10.1117/1.APN.3.5.056006

    CSTR:32397.14.1.APN.3.5.056006

    Topics