High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 1, Issue 1, 01000029(2013)
Beam positioning stability analysis on large laser facilities
Figures & Tables(14)
Fig. 1. Schematic of a single laser beam in a laser-driven ICF facility without mirrors.
).Fig. 3. Variance of weighing factors in laser-driven ICF facilities.
Fig. 9. Steel trusses filled with concrete that decreased the responses around modal frequencies.
Table 1. Optical parameters of SG-II Origin.
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Optical parameters of SG-II Origin.
Spatial filters ${f}_{i, 2} ~(\mathrm{m} )$ ${m}_{i} $ ${q}_{i} $ ${p}_{i} $ ${\mathrm{SF} }_{0} $ 1.0 2.000 0.0034 0.0034 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{1} $ 1.9559 2.455 0.0043 0.0069 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{2} $ 1.8600 3.014 0.0137 0.0169 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{3} $ 4.6 3.433 0.0190 0.0503 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{4} $ 1.752 1 0.0499 0.1749 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{5} $ 3.95 1.819 0.0403 0.1749 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{6} $ 3.231 1.430 0.0704 0.3181 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{7} $ 9.856 2.243 0.0518 0.4549 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{8} $ 14.502 1.470 0.0517 1.0204 Focusing lens ${f}_{T} = 0. 75$ — ${q}_{T} = 1$ ${p}_{T} = 1. 5$
Table 2. Optical parameters of SG-II Additional beam.
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Optical parameters of SG-II Additional beam.
Spatial filters ${f}_{i, 2} ~(\mathrm{m} )$ ${m}_{i} $ ${q}_{i} $ ${p}_{i} $ ${\mathrm{SF} }_{0} $ 1.0 2.000 0.0061 0.0061 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{1} $ 1.9559 2.455 0.0076 0.0121 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{2} $ 1.8600 3.014 0.0241 0.0297 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{3} $ 2.3825 2.960 0.0556 0.0896 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{4} $ 1.9971 2.000 0.1327 0.2651 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{5} $ 4.0808 1.500 0.0974 0.5302 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{6} $ 4.8643 2.120 0.1733 0.7953 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{7} $ 5.6547 1.730 0.2579 1.6859 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{8} $ 8.4876 1.080 0.1856 2.9167 Focusing lens ${f}_{T} = 1. 575$ — ${q}_{T} = 1$ ${p}_{T} = 3. 1500$
Table 3. Optical parameters of SG-II Updated.
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Optical parameters of SG-II Updated.
Spatial filters ${f}_{i, 2} ~(\mathrm{m} )$ ${m}_{i} $ ${q}_{i} $ ${p}_{i} $ ${\mathrm{SF} }_{0} $ 1.800 1 0.0400 0.1441 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{1} $ 2.080 1.6 0.0554 0.1441 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{2} $ 2.850 1.5 0.0607 0.2306 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{3} $ 2.600 2 0.1330 0.3459 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{4} $ 16.000 6.4584 0.1396 0.6918 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{5} $ 11.117 0.9355 0.1880 4.4680 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{6} $ 11.883 1.0689 0.1880 4.1800 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{7} $ 11.117 0.9355 0.1880 4.4680 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{8} $ 11.883 1.0689 0.1880 4.1800 ${\mathrm{SF} }_{9} $ 16.000 1 0.1396 4.4680 Focusing lens ${f}_{T} = 2. 234$ — ${q}_{T} = 1$ ${p}_{T} = 4. 468$
Table 4. Experimental parameters in a four-pass amplification system.
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Experimental parameters in a four-pass amplification system.
Lenses in four-pass amplification (FPA) CSF-L1 (m) CSF-L2 (m) Beam aperture magnification ratio Real parameters in SG-II updated 11.883 11.117 0.9355 First fictional parameters 20 10 0.5 Second fictional parameters 10 5 0.5
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Fang Liu, Zhigang Liu, Liunian Zheng, Hongbiao Huang, Jianqiang Zhu. Beam positioning stability analysis on large laser facilities[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2013, 1(1): 01000029
Paper Information
Category: review
Received: Nov. 13, 2012
Accepted: Dec. 11, 2012
Published Online: Jul. 17, 2013
The Author Email: Fang Liu (funlau@siom.ac.cn)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20