Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 24, 2437004(2024)

Underwater Optical Image Enhancement Based on Degradation Characteristic Indices

Jinxiang Ma1, Xinnan Fan2、*, Chunjun Qian1, Feng Wu1, and Ruxi Xiang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213032, Jiangsu , China
  • 2College of Information Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, Jiangsu , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(28)
    Logical relationship of image restoration and enhancement algorithm for underwater optical image based on degradation characteristics
    Flowchart of enhancement algorithm for underwater optical image based on degradation characteristics
    BGLR operational characteristic. (a) Addition; (b) subtraction; (c) multiplication
    Middle crack image and its corresponding histogram. (a) Middle crack image; (b) corresponding histogram
    Characteristic restoration image of middle crack image. (a) Restoration of characteristic A; (b) restoration 1 of characteristic B and C; (c) restoration 2 of characteristic B and C
    Adaptive gain enhancement images of middle crack image under different mean adaptive gradient gain. (a) 1.0731; (b) 1.2530; (c) 1.5054
    Enhancement images of middle crack image by different algorithms. (a) DCP; (b) UDCP; (c) URetinex; (d) CLAHE; (e) Choi; (f) Galdran; (g) Meng; (h) TL; (i) Ucolor
    Slope image and its corresponding histogram. (a) Slope image; (b) corresponding histogram
    Different layered aperture image and uniform light correction image of slope image. (a) 5-layer aperture map; (b) 11-layer aperture map; (c) 23-layer aperture map; (d) 5-layer aperture correction image; (e) 11-layer aperture correction image; (f) 23-layer aperture correction image
    Characteristic restoration images of slope image. (a) Restoration of characteristic A; (b) restoration 1 of characteristic A, B, and C; (c) restoration 2 of characteristic A, B, and C
    Adaptive gain enhancement images of slope image under different mean adaptive gradient gain. (a) 1.0916; (b) 1.2871; (c) 1.5678
    Enhancement results of slope image by different algorithms. (a) DCP; (b) UDCP; (c) URetinex; (d) CLAHE; (e) Choi; (f) Galdran; (g) Meng; (h) TL; (i) Ucolor
    • Table 1. General scale parameters of middle crack image

      View table

      Table 1. General scale parameters of middle crack image

      General scale parameterValue
      Size /(pixel×pixel)683×572
      Mean159.07
      Contrast6.15
      Entropy7.47
      CM42.04
    • Table 2. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of middle crack image

      View table

      Table 2. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of middle crack image

      Degradation characteristicCharacteristic parameterValueResult judgement
      Non-uniform brightnessLdifference155Y
      Low signal-to-noise ratioD2.38Y
      Narrow dynamic rangeRdynamic /%60.00Y
      Color distortionϑ1.00N
    • Table 3. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of characteristic restoration image for middle crack image

      View table

      Table 3. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of characteristic restoration image for middle crack image

      FigureGeneral scale parameterEvaluation index
      MeanContrastEntropyCMMSEPSNR
      Fig.5(a)99.295.295.4711.231501.3316.39
      Fig.5(b)130.13119.457.3045.582424.7414.42
      Fig.5(c)129.4760.907.3644.082017.2515.23
    • Table 4. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of characteristic restoration image for middle crack image

      View table

      Table 4. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of characteristic restoration image for middle crack image

      FigureNon-uniform brightnessLow signal-to-noise ratioNarrow dynamic rangeColor distortion
      LdifferenceResult judgementDResult judgementRdynamic /%Result judgementϑResult judgement
      Fig.5(a)27N1.84Y15.69Y0.92N
      Fig.5(b)11N0.36N74.90N1.00N
      Fig.5(c)28N0.58N62.75N1.00N
    • Table 5. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of adaptive gain enhancement images for middle crack image

      View table

      Table 5. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of adaptive gain enhancement images for middle crack image

      FigureGeneral scale parameterEvaluation index
      MeanContrastEntropyCMMSEPSNR
      Fig.6(a)129.9171.987.4546.3310.2438.03
      Fig.6(b)130.1086.277.5850.7438.5032.28
      Fig.6(c)130.25107.357.7156.31114.7227.54
    • Table 6. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of adaptive gain enhancement images for middle crack image

      View table

      Table 6. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of adaptive gain enhancement images for middle crack image

      FigureNon-uniform brightnessLow signal-to-noise ratioNarrow dynamic rangeColor distortion
      LdifferenceResult judgementDResult judgementRdynamic /%Result judgementϑResult judgement
      Fig.6(a)37N0.47N65.10N1.00N
      Fig.6(b)40N0.42N70.20N1.00N
      Fig.6(c)44N0.37N76.08N1.01N
    • Table 7. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of middle crack enhancement images by different algorithms

      View table

      Table 7. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of middle crack enhancement images by different algorithms

      AlgorithmGeneral scale parameterEvaluation index
      MeanContrastEntropyCMMSEPSNR
      DCP71.9117.947.1436.668305.418.94
      UDCP64.8219.027.0536.389454.868.38
      URetinex116.4913.167.7638.422105.6214.99
      CLAHE128.1631.507.1625.991791.4815.68
      Choi97.3427.287.3138.064533.9511.63
      Galdran109.9120.857.5725.832649.1313.91
      Meng81.6536.406.9235.877059.819.65
      TL107.7126.347.6830.372961.8713.45
      Ucolor127.4110.127.6032.711077.4317.82
    • Table 8. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of middle crack enhancement images by different algorithms

      View table

      Table 8. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of middle crack enhancement images by different algorithms

      AlgorithmNon-uniform brightnessLow signal-to-noise ratioNarrow dynamic rangeColor distortion
      LdifferenceResult judgementDResult judgementRdynamic /%Result judgementϑResult judgement
      DCP115Y0.66Y52.94Y1.04N
      UDCP136Y0.57N61.18N1.09N
      URetinex176Y1.29Y72.94N1.00N
      CLAHE96Y1.11Y47.84Y1.00N
      Choi151Y0.48N87.45N1.06N
      Galdran158Y0.95Y66.27N1.04N
      Meng87Y0.55N44.31Y1.04N
      TL179Y0.77Y75.29N1.04N
      Ucolor161Y1.42Y65.10N1.03N
    • Table 9. General scale parameters of slope image

      View table

      Table 9. General scale parameters of slope image

      General scale parameterValue
      Size/(pixel × pixel)1279 × 685
      Mean171.10
      Contrast30.77
      Entropy6.46
      CM32.39
    • Table 10. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of slope image

      View table

      Table 10. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of slope image

      Degradation characteristicCharacteristic parameterValueResult judgement
      Non-uniform brightnessLdifference65Y
      Low signal-to-noise ratioD0.62Y
      Narrow dynamic rangeRdynamic /%29.41Y
      Color distortionϑ0.66Y
    • Table 11. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of characteristic restoration images for slope image

      View table

      Table 11. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of characteristic restoration images for slope image

      FigureGeneral scale parameterEvaluation index
      MeanContrastEntropyCMMSEPSNR
      Fig.10(a)172.2910.866.2030.1295.8529.05
      Fig.10 (b)127.98116.657.5841.57128.59Inf
      Fig.10 (c)128.59172.617.7550.89274.4335.43
    • Table 12. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of characteristic restoration images for slope image

      View table

      Table 12. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of characteristic restoration images for slope image

      FigureNon-uniform brightnessLow signal-to-noise ratioNarrow dynamic rangeColor distortion
      LdifferenceResult judgementDResult judgementRdynamic /%Result judgementϑResult judgement
      Fig.10(a)13N0.71Y25.88Y0.66Y
      Fig.10(b)22N0.37N63.92N1.00N
      Fig.10(c)30N0.27N78.43N1.00N
    • Table 13. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of adaptive gain enhancement images of slope image

      View table

      Table 13. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of adaptive gain enhancement images of slope image

      FigureGeneral scale parameterEvaluation index
      MeanContrastEntropyCMMSEPSNR
      Fig.11(a)128.65210.377.8053.5111.2437.64
      Fig.11(b)129.50253.877.8758.0857.3530.55
      Fig.11(c)130.67316.257.8963.81183.3425.50
    • Table 14. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of adaptive gain enhancement images of slope image

      View table

      Table 14. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of adaptive gain enhancement images of slope image

      FigureNon-uniform brightnessLow signal-to-noise ratioNarrow dynamic rangeColor distortion
      LdifferenceResult judgementDResult judgementRdynamic /%Result judgementϑResult judgement
      Fig.11(a)22N0.25N80.00N1.00N
      Fig.11(b)26N0.23N84.71N1.00N
      Fig.11(c)24N0.21N89.80N1.00N
    • Table 15. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of slope enhancement results by different algorithms

      View table

      Table 15. General scale parameters and evaluation indices of slope enhancement results by different algorithms

      AlgorithmGeneral scale parameterEvaluation index
      MeanContrastEntropyCMMSEPSNR
      DCP120.7868.216.8729.452988.4914.43
      UDCP93.01200.316.8441.547211.949.58
      URetinex100.21219.667.7540.827825.3310.27
      CLAHE128.71207.967.5235.573284.4114.75
      Choi100.66140.016.6031.086536.0811.05
      Galdran101.8789.646.9821.905075.4411.10
      Meng125.85153.177.0638.512731.4614.71
      TL105.8781.916.6827.955002.6012.06
      Ucolor146.0686.247.1631.171304.9119.40
    • Table 16. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of slope enhancement results by different algorithms

      View table

      Table 16. Degradation characteristic parameters and its results judgement of slope enhancement results by different algorithms

      AlgorithmNon-uniform brightnessLow signal-to-noise ratioNarrow dynamic rangeColor distortion
      LdifferenceResult judgementDResult judgementRdynamic /%Result judgementϑResult judgement
      DCP47N0.22N39.61Y0.34Y
      UDCP100Y0.16N69.80N0.40Y
      URetinex121Y0.24N75.69N0.99N
      CLAHE72Y0.31N61.57N0.92N
      Choi49N0.16N53.73Y0.13Y
      Galdran73Y0.20N48.24Y0.46Y
      Meng68Y0.19N45.49Y0.36Y
      TL75Y0.19N45.10Y0.23Y
      Ucolor99Y0.48N47.84Y0.86N
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jinxiang Ma, Xinnan Fan, Chunjun Qian, Feng Wu, Ruxi Xiang. Underwater Optical Image Enhancement Based on Degradation Characteristic Indices[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(24): 2437004

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Digital Image Processing

    Received: Apr. 9, 2024

    Accepted: Apr. 29, 2024

    Published Online: Dec. 16, 2024

    The Author Email: Xinnan Fan (fanxn@hhuc.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP241066

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP241066

    Topics