Matter and Radiation at Extremes, Volume. 10, Issue 4, 047603(2025)

Zeeman splitting observations in laser-produced magnetized blast waves

A. Triantafyllidis1、*, J.-R. Marquès1, S. Ferri2, A. Calisti2, Y. Benkadoum1, Y. De León3, A. Dearling4,5, A. Ciardi6, J. Béard7, J.-M. Lagarrigue7, N. Ozaki8,9, M. Koenig1, and B. Albertazzi1
Author Affiliations
  • 1LULI - CNRS, CEA, Sorbonne Universités, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, F-91120 Palaiseau cedex, France
  • 2Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, PIIM, F-13013 Marseille, France
  • 3École Normale Supérieur de Lyon, Lyon, France
  • 4York Plasma Institute, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
  • 5Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BZ, United Kingdom
  • 6Sorbonne Université, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, LUX, 75005 Paris, France
  • 7Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses, LNCMI-CNRS, EMFL, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Université Toulouse 3, INSA Toulouse, F-31400 Toulouse, France
  • 8Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • 9Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Experimental setup at the LULI2000 facility. A laser beam was used to drive the target (graphite pin) and generate a BW in air. A 2ω probe beam was used transversely to the propagation of the BW for the interferometry diagnostic. SOP and 2D self-emission diagnostics collected the light coming from the same direction. High- and low-dispersion optical spectrometers gathered the self-emission light at 3 and 4 mm from TCC along the laser axis from the top access point. The magnetic field was perpendicular or parallel to the BW propagation axis. Part of the coil casing is removed here for better visualization.
    2D self-emission snapshots of the BW plasma in the 580–850 nm range as a function of time and magnetic field. The graphite pin target is outside the field of view to the left of the images. The shaded area on the center-left image indicates the approximate volume and position probed by the optical spectrometers (150 × 150 × 50 μm3, 3 and 4 mm for the perpendicular and parallel magnetic field to the spectrometers’ line of view, respectively).
    Time-resolved spectra collected by the HD spectrometer for two bandwidths (left: 493–504 nm, right: 563–573 nm). Both orientations of the magnetic field are presented: (a) and (d) at 0 T, (b) and (e) at 20 T (parallel to the line of sight), and, (c) and (f) at 20 T (perpendicular to the line of sight). The shaded bands in (a) and (d) indicate the time range over which the signal was integrated (see Fig. 4). The Zeeman splitting is particularly apparent by comparing images (d) and (e), as shown by the arrows.
    Time-integrated lineouts from 140 to 160 ns for all values and orientations of the magnetic field: (a) 493–504 nm, (b) 563–573 nm. The dashed vertical lines correspond to the theoretical NII lines from NIST.
    PPPB simulations for the NII transitions overlaid on time-integrated (over 50 ns) lineouts for 5, 10 and 20 T: (a) perpendicular and (b) parallel to the magnetic field orientation. Solid curves represent the values indicated in the legend, while the shaded areas correspond to simulations with δne = ±0.2 × 1018 cm−3 relative to them (here, curves with higher intensities correspond to higher densities). The electron temperature is Te = 5 eV for all simulated spectra. A linear background has been added to account for the bremsstrahlung emission of the plasma, and the spectra are normalized for each magnetic field and orientation. The dashed vertical lines correspond to the theoretical NII lines from NIST.
    Same as Fig. 5, but with a variation in electron temperature indicated by the shaded areas for 1 or 2 eV. Here, curves with lower intensities correspond to higher Te. The plasma conditions for the simulated spectrum with the solid line are ne = 1.6 × 1018 cm−3 and Te = 5 eV. A linear background has been added to account for the bremsstrahlung emission of the plasma and the spectra are normalized for each magnetic field orientation. The dashed vertical lines correspond to the theoretical NII lines from NIST.
    Same as Fig. 5, but with a variation in the magnetic field indicated by the shaded areas for 2 or 3 T. Here, curves with lower intensities correspond to higher B. The plasma conditions for the simulated spectra are ne = 1.6 × 1018 cm−3 and Te = 5 eV.
    Time-integrated spectra (over 50 ns) compared to the NII, CII and combined PPPB simulations; ne = 1.4 × 1018 cm−3, Te = 5 eV and ne = 1.6 × 1018 cm−3, Te = 5 eV for B‖ of (a) 10 and (b) 15 T, respectively. A linear background has been added to account for the bremsstrahlung emission of the plasma. The dashed vertical lines correspond to the theoretical NII lines from NIST.
    Time-integrated spectra (over 50 ns) compared to the NII PPPB simulations for a parallel magnetic field orientation and the conditions shown in the legend. The similarity in the line shapes for certain combinations of ne and Te necessitate the use of independent diagnostics to choose the appropriate values. The dashed vertical lines correspond to the theoretical NII lines from NIST.
    • Table 1. The nitrogen lines that were simulated.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. The nitrogen lines that were simulated.

      Theoretical wavelength (nm)Transition
      566.6632s22p3p3D22s22p3s3P10
      567.6022s22p3p3D12s22p3s3P00
      567.9562s22p3p3D32s22p3s3P20
      568.6212s22p3p3D12s22p3s3P10
      571.0772s22p3p3D22s22p3s3P20
      574.7302s22p3p3D22s22p3s1P10
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    A. Triantafyllidis, J.-R. Marquès, S. Ferri, A. Calisti, Y. Benkadoum, Y. De León, A. Dearling, A. Ciardi, J. Béard, J.-M. Lagarrigue, N. Ozaki, M. Koenig, B. Albertazzi. Zeeman splitting observations in laser-produced magnetized blast waves[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2025, 10(4): 047603

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Jan. 7, 2025

    Accepted: Apr. 20, 2025

    Published Online: Jul. 28, 2025

    The Author Email: A. Triantafyllidis (angelos.triantafyllidis@polytechnique.edu)

    DOI:10.1063/5.0256859

    Topics