Photonics Research, Volume. 13, Issue 6, 1591(2025)

Multifunctional fronthaul architecture enabled by electro-optic comb cloning Editors' Pick

Jingjing Lin1... Chenbo Zhang1, Weihan Liang1, Yi Zou1, Yixiao Zhu2,3, Weisheng Hu2, Zhangyuan Chen1, Weiwei Hu1 and Xiaopeng Xie1,* |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Photonics and Communications, School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Photonics and Communications, Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3e-mail: yixiaozhu@sjtu.edu.cn
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Concept of clock-synchronized, parallel WDM channel fronthaul structure enabling multifunctional RAN, empowering various applications required in the IMT 2030 usage scenarios [17].
    The principle of EO comb cloning and clock synchronization.
    Experimental setup for the clock-synchronized, self-homodyne fronthaul structure enabled by EO comb cloning. IM: intensity modulator, PM: phase modulator, RF: RF source, AWG: arbitrary waveform generator, IQ Mod.: in-phase and quadrature modulator, PDME: polarization division multiplexing emulator, WSS: wavelength selective switch, VOA: variable optical attenuator, PD: photodetector, OBPF: optical bandpass filter, Coh. Rx.: coherent receiver, VCO: voltage-controlled oscillator, 1/2: 1/2 frequency divider, 1/125: 1/125 frequency divider, PM-EDFA: polarization maintaining erbium-doped fiber amplifier, EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier, LNA: low-noise amplifier.
    Optical spectra of (a) generated carrier comb at Tx (blue line) and cloned comb at Rx (red line) and (b) received signal after 10 km transmission.
    (a) RF spectrum of 25 GHz signal generated by VCO. The inset is the 100 MHz clock signal via subsequent frequency dividing. (b) Single-sideband phase noise PSD of 25 GHz RF source (purple curve), 25 GHz VCO RF output with and without servo loop locking (red and yellow curves), and 100 MHz clock signal after frequency dividing (blue curve).
    (a) Single-sideband PSD of the 100 MHz post-frequency-dividing VCO signal with phase-locked loop with different transmission distances of back-to-back, 4 km, 10 km, and 20 km, marked in red, yellow, blue, and purple, respectively; (b) timing jitter of the 100 MHz clock with different received optical powers of the photodetector.
    The constellations of the 64-QAM signal for Ch. #–1 under three scenarios: without clock synchronization, with digital timing recovery, and with our proposed approach, and Ch. #6. The DSP omission for each recovered signal’s constellation is indicated at the top, highlighting the DSP omission ratio for each case. Note that the carrier phase estimation omission ratio is elaborated in Appendix A.
    (a) BER performance of Ch. #–7 to −1, 3 to 7. All 12 channels used for transmission meet the threshold of 1.0×10−2 for the hard decision FEC with 14% overhead, averaging at BER=7.2×10−3. (b) BER versus received optical power of the signal for Ch. #–1. Minor penalty is observed compared to the ideal electrical back to back and most commonly used DSP-synchronized scenario across different received signal optical powers, showcasing the effectiveness of our approach.
    DSP flows of the traditional coherent transmission and simplified DSP thanks to the clock-synchronized and self-homodyne architecture in our approach.
    • Table 1. Capacity and Timing Jitter/Phase Noise Comparison with Current Works

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Capacity and Timing Jitter/Phase Noise Comparison with Current Works

      ApproachCapacityTiming Jitter/Phase NoiseRe-scaled Timing Jitter/Phase Noise in This WorkFrequency Range
      White Rabbit [14,15]1.25 Gb/s2 ps138 fs10 Hz–40 MHz
      Frequency comb dissemination [27]1.2 Gb/s73 fs104 fs1 kHz–10 MHz
      Phase caching [16]25.6 Gb/s−90 dBc/Hz−87 dBc/Hz10 Hz
       −95 dBc/Hz−104 dBc/Hz100 Hz
       −95 dBc/Hz−117 dBc/Hz1 kHz
       −113 dBc/Hz−113 dBc/Hz10 kHz
       −120 dBc/Hz−129 dBc/Hz100 kHz
       −131 dBc/Hz−141 dBc/Hz1 MHz
       −140 dBc/Hz−152 dBc/Hz10 MHz
      EO comb cloning (our approach)240  Gb/s×12 
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jingjing Lin, Chenbo Zhang, Weihan Liang, Yi Zou, Yixiao Zhu, Weisheng Hu, Zhangyuan Chen, Weiwei Hu, Xiaopeng Xie, "Multifunctional fronthaul architecture enabled by electro-optic comb cloning," Photonics Res. 13, 1591 (2025)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

    Received: Jan. 8, 2025

    Accepted: Mar. 22, 2025

    Published Online: May. 26, 2025

    The Author Email: Xiaopeng Xie (xiaopeng.xie@pku.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.552048

    CSTR:32188.14.PRJ.552048

    Topics