Journal of Applied Optics, Volume. 46, Issue 1, 17(2025)

Advances in spectral matching techniques for solar simulators

Tingting LI1,2, Yajun PANG1,2、*, and Jianyang LIU1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Advanced Laser Technology, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
  • 2Hebei Key Laboratory of Advanced Laser Technology and Equipment, Tianjin 300401, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Structural layout of spectrum correction module[61]
    Triple-source solar simulator designed by JENKINS P, et al[67]
    Luminaire layout diagram of solar simulator designed by BAGUCKIS A, et al[70]
    LED layout diagram of solar simulator designed by NOVICKOVAS A, et al[79]
    • Table 1. Classifications of solar simulators in IEC, JIS and ASTM standards

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Classifications of solar simulators in IEC, JIS and ASTM standards

      Standards organizationsPerformance parameters
      Spectral matchIrradiation non-uniformityTemporal instability
      IEC 60904-9-2007A0.75~1.25±2%±2%
      B0.6~1.4±5%±5%
      C0.4~2.0±10%±10%
      JIS C8942-2009MS0.95~1.05±2%±1%
      MA0.75~1.25±2%±1%
      B0.6~1.4±3%±3%
      C0.4~2.0±10%±10%
      ASTM E927-19A0.75~1.25±2%±2%
      B0.6~1.4±5%±5%
      C0.4~2.0±10%±10%
    • Table 2. Reference spectral distribution in IEC, JIS and ASTM standards

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Reference spectral distribution in IEC, JIS and ASTM standards

      Spectral rageTotal irradiance (IEC、JIS)Total irradiance (ASTM)
      400 nm~500 nm18.4%18.21%
      500 nm~600 nm19.9%19.73%
      600 nm~700 nm18.4%18.20%
      700 nm~800 nm14.9%14.79%
      800 nm~900 nm12.5%12.39%
      900 nm~1 100 nm15.9%15.89%
    • Table 3. Solar simulator grade according to IEC 60904-9-2020 standard

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Solar simulator grade according to IEC 60904-9-2020 standard

      GradeClass A+Class AClass BClass C
      Spectral match0.875-1.1250.75-1.250.6-1.40.4-2.0
      Irradiation non-uniformity≤±1%≤±2%≤±5%≤±10%
      Temporal instability≤±1%≤±2%≤±5%≤±10%
    • Table 4. Reference spectral distribution in range of 300 nm~1 200 nm according to IEC 60904-9-2020 standard

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Reference spectral distribution in range of 300 nm~1 200 nm according to IEC 60904-9-2020 standard

      Spectral rageTotal irradiance
      300 nm~470 nm16.61%
      470 nm~561 nm16.74%
      561 nm~657 nm16.67%
      657 nm~772 nm16.63%
      772 nm~919 nm16.66%
      919 nm~1200 nm16.69%
    • Table 5. Spectral matching performances of solar simulators with traditional light sources

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Spectral matching performances of solar simulators with traditional light sources

      YearLight sourceSpectral rangeSpectrum/Spectral matching degree/Spectral gradeRef
      20126 pulsed Xenon lamps + filters400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.91~1.05/A[59]
      2013Xenon arcs + filters300 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[60]
      2013Xenon arcs + filters400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[62]
      2015Xenon arcs + 4 filters300 nm~1 700 nmAM0/0.8514/A[61]
      2016Xenon lamps + combined filters400 nm~1 200 nmAM1.5G/0.946/A[63]
      2022Xenon arcs + filters400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.8~1.2/A[64]
    • Table 6. Spectral matching performances of multi-source solar simulators

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Spectral matching performances of multi-source solar simulators

      YearLight sourceSpectral rangeSpectrum/Spectral matching degree/Spectral gradeRef
      1962Xenon arc + TungstenAM0/-/-[65]
      1990Xenon arc + Tungsten Halogen350 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/-/-[66]
      2005Xenon arc + TungstenAM0/-/-[67]
      2009Halogen + 8-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/B[72]
      2009Xenon arc + Ectothermic blackbody0.4 μm~12 μmAM1.5G/0.85/A[68]
      2012Xenon arc + 53-color LEDs380 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/0.97/A[71]
      2016Halogen + 6-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.75/A[70]
      2023Xenon arc + Halogen350 nm~1 800 nmAM0/-/A[69]
    • Table 7. Spectral matching performances of LED solar simulators

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Spectral matching performances of LED solar simulators

      YearLight sourceSpectral rangeSpectrum/Spectral matching degree/Spectral gradeRef
      20084-color LEDsAM1.5G/0.77/A[73]
      201018-color-LEDs390 nm~940 nmAM1.5G/0.9/A[74]
      201423-color LEDs350 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[75]
      2015LEDs300 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.99/A[77]
      20156-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.92~1.08/A[81]
      20166-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[79]
      20186-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.995/A[76]
      201815-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.94/A[78]
      201911-color LEDs400 nm~900 nmAM1.5G/-/A[82]
      202039-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.9544/A[83]
      202119-color LEDs250 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/-/A[80]
      20186-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.995/A[76]
      201815-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.94/A[78]
      201911-color LEDs400 nm~900 nmAM1.5G/-/A[82]
      202039-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.9544/A[83]
      202119-color LEDs250 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/-/A[80]
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tingting LI, Yajun PANG, Jianyang LIU. Advances in spectral matching techniques for solar simulators[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2025, 46(1): 17

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Mar. 29, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Apr. 1, 2025

    The Author Email: Yajun PANG (庞亚军)

    DOI:10.5768/JAO202546.0109002

    Topics