High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 12, Issue 2, 02000e13(2024)
Mismatch analysis of all-fiber coherent beam combiners based on the self-imaging effect
Figures & Tables(18)
Fig. 1. Diagram of the all-fiber coherent beam combiner based on the self-imaging effect.
Fig. 2. Diagram of (a) the position error and (b) the polarization deviation of the fiber array.
Fig. 3. Diagram of (a) the transversal offset, (b) the angular offset and (c) the pointing error between the fiber array and the square-core fiber.
Fig. 4. Diagram of (a) the core roundness, (b) the side inclination, (c) the twist and (d) the bending of square-core fiber.
Fig. 5. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the position error of the fiber array. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by position error. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to position error corresponding to 1% loss of the beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 6. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the polarization deviation of the fiber array. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by polarization deviation. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to polarization direction error corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 7. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the transversal offset between the fiber array and the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by transversal offset. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to transversal offset corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 8. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the angular offset between the fiber array and the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by angular offset. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to angular offset corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 9. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the pointing error between the fiber array and the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by the pointing error. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to pointing error corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 10. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the corner radius of the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by rounded corners. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to rounded corners corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 11. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the side straightness of the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by curved edge borders. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to curved edge borders corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 12. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the side inclination of the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by slanted edge borders. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to slanted edge borders corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 13. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the twist angle of the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by the square-core fiber twist. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to square-core fiber twist corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 14. Dependence of (a) the beam quality and (b) the efficiency of CBC on the bending radius of the square-core fiber. (c) Intensity distribution of the combined beam influenced by square-core fiber bending. (d) Diagram of the tolerance to square-core fiber bending corresponding to 1% loss of beam combining efficiency under different fiber arrays.
Fig. 15. The combining efficiency of the fundamental mode and the high-order mode varies with different welding position deviations.
Fig. 16. (a) Diagram of the spot array output by the fiber array. (b) Diagram of the combining spot.
Fig. 17. Microscopic images of the 2 × 2 self-imaging combiner: (a) on the fiber array side; (b) on the square-core fiber side.
Table 1. Tolerance for mismatch errors at 1% combining efficiency loss.
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Tolerance for mismatch errors at 1% combining efficiency loss.
Variation of tolerance with the increasing Error tolerance at 1% combining efficiency loss combination Type of mismatch error 2 × 2 3 × 3 4 × 4 5 × 5 6 × 6 channels Alignment error Position error (μm) 0.30 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.20 Stricter of fiber array Polarization deviation (°) 5.0 4.5 4.3 3.7 3.5 Stricter Assembly error Transversal offset (μm) 0.50 0.48 0.47 0.44 0.42 Stricter between fiber array Angular offset (°) 0.5 0.34 0.27 0.2 0.15 Stricter and square-core fiber Pointing error (°) 0.100 0.103 0.105 0.108 0.110 Barely changed Geometric error Corner radius (μm) 4.0 4.7 5.0 5.5 5.7 More relaxed of square-core Side straightness (μm) 0.80 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.25 Stricter fiber Side inclination (°) 0.60 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.15 Stricter Twist angle (°) 1.50 1.00 0.75 0.65 0.50 Stricter Bending radius (m) 42 84 152 256 385 Stricter
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yuefang Yan, Yu Liu, Haoyu Zhang, Yuwei Li, Chao Guo, Qiang Shu, Wenhui Huang, Feng Jing, Rumao Tao. Mismatch analysis of all-fiber coherent beam combiners based on the self-imaging effect[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2024, 12(2): 02000e13
Paper Information
Category: Research Articles
Received: Apr. 9, 2023
Accepted: Nov. 10, 2023
Posted: Nov. 13, 2023
Published Online: Mar. 8, 2024
The Author Email: Rumao Tao (supertaozhi@163.com)
CSTR:32185.14.hpl.2023.88
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20