Effectiveness of Peripheral Wavefront Reconstruction Algorithms Using Shack-Hartmann Sensor Measurements

Xinyue Zhang; Xinyu Du; Xiaoyang Hu; Yujie Cui; Dongyu Liu; Dong Xiang; Yongji Liu

doi:10.3788/AOS241796

Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 7, 0733001(2025)

Effectiveness of Peripheral Wavefront Reconstruction Algorithms Using Shack-Hartmann Sensor Measurements

Xinyue Zhang^1,2, Xinyu Du^1,2, Xiaoyang Hu^1,2, Yujie Cui^1,2, Dongyu Liu^1,2, Dong Xiang^1,2, and Yongji Liu^1,2、*

¹Institute of Modern Optics, College of Electronic Information and Optical Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China

²Tianjin Key Laboratory of Micro-Scale Optical Information Science and Technology, Tianjin , 300350, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(13)

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of Zemax modeling for human eye model aberration measurement system

Download full size

Fig. 2. Spot images of different fields of view. (a) 0°field of view; (b) 10° horizontal field of view; (c) 20° horizontal field of view; (d) 30° horizontal field of view

Download full size

Fig. 3. Flow chart for unwrapped algorithm

Download full size

Fig. 4. Spot images after elliptic pupil processing. (a) LC method; (b) SC method; (c) SE method

Download full size

Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of human eye aberration measurement by SH wavefront sensor. (a) Horizontal field of view; (b) full field of view

Download full size

Fig. 6. Spot images of 30° field of view processed by three elliptic pupil methods. (a)‒(c) SC method; (d)‒(f) LC method; (g)‒(i) SE method

Download full size

Fig. 7. Comparison of Zernike coefficients reconstructed by three kinds of elliptical pupil algorithms and the real wavefront coefficients. (a) 10° field of view; (b) 20° field of view; (c) 30° field of view

Download full size

Fig. 8. PSF images constructed by Zernike coefficient of human eye model

Download full size

Fig. 9. Wavefront image constructed by Zernike coefficient of human eye model, a mask is applied to the reconstructed wavefront by LC method, and the reconstructed wavefront by SE method is compressed

Download full size

Fig. 10. Residual histograms of M and J₀. (a) $M$ ; (b) $J_{0}$

Download full size

Table 1. Comparison of true wavefront coefficients and reconstructed wavefront coefficients of 0° field of view in human eye model
View table
Table 1. Comparison of true wavefront coefficients and reconstructed wavefront coefficients of 0° field of view in human eye model
Zernike order 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
True wavefront /μm 0 9.954 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.046
Construction wavefront /μm 0 10.086 0.003 0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.032
Deviation /μm 0 0.132 0.003 0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.008

Table 2. PSF SSIM calculating from LC, SC, and SE methods
View table
Table 2. PSF SSIM calculating from LC, SC, and SE methods
Field of view LC method SC method SE method
10° 0.8468 0.8528 0.7955
20° 0.8537 0.8642 0.8848
30° 0.8804 0.8834 0.9369

Table 3. RMSE, percentage of residual error $,$ M, and J₀ at 10°, 20°, and 30° fields of view

View table

Table 3. RMSE, percentage of residual error $,$ M, and J₀ at 10°, 20°, and 30° fields of view

Parameter	Field of view	True wavefront	LC method	SC method	SE method
RMSE /μm	10°	9.747	9.976	9.937	9.990
	20°	9.223	9.950	8.929	9.471
	30°	8.076	9.380	6.939	8.518
Residual error /%	10°	—	2.355	1.958	2.498
	20°	—	7.882	-3.188	2.685
	30°	—	16.144	-14.080	4.717
	10°	-3.333	-3.341	-3.398	-3.416
$M$ /D	20°	-3.111	-3.276	-2.921	-3.079
	30°	-2.720	-3.136	-2.322	-2.854
	10°	-0.040	-0.046	-0.046	-0.038
$J_{0}$ /D	20°	-0.135	-0.171	-0.151	-0.157
	30°	-0.291	-0.411	-0.307	-0.359

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Xinyue Zhang, Xinyu Du, Xiaoyang Hu, Yujie Cui, Dongyu Liu, Dong Xiang, Yongji Liu. Effectiveness of Peripheral Wavefront Reconstruction Algorithms Using Shack-Hartmann Sensor Measurements[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(7): 0733001

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

Received: Nov. 26, 2024

Accepted: Jan. 20, 2025

Published Online: Apr. 27, 2025

The Author Email: Yongji Liu (yjliu@nankai.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3788/AOS241796

CSTR:32393.14.AOS241796

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Comparison of true wavefront coefficients and reconstructed wavefront coefficients of 0° field of view in human eye model

Table 1. Comparison of true wavefront coefficients and reconstructed wavefront coefficients of 0° field of view in human eye model

Table 2. PSF SSIM calculating from LC, SC, and SE methods

Table 2. PSF SSIM calculating from LC, SC, and SE methods

Table 3. RMSE, percentage of residual error,M, and J0 at 10°, 20°, and 30° fields of view

Table 3. RMSE, percentage of residual error,M, and J0 at 10°, 20°, and 30° fields of view

Table 3. RMSE, percentage of residual error $,$ M, and J₀ at 10°, 20°, and 30° fields of view

Table 3. RMSE, percentage of residual error $,$ M, and J₀ at 10°, 20°, and 30° fields of view