Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 41, Issue 6, 0601002(2021)

Estimation of Phytoplankton Pigment Concentration in the South China Sea from Hyperspectral Absorption Data

Guifen Wang1,2、*, Yinxue Zhang1,2, Wenlong Xu1,2, Wen Zhou3, Hualian Wu4, Zhantang Xu3, and Wenxi Cao3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • 2College of Oceanography, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510301, China
  • 4CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510301, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Regression relationship between concentration of TChl a and concentration of accessory pigments (AP)
    Representative spectral absorption coefficients and their derivatives. (a) 4th derivative spectrum; (b) 2nd derivative spectrum; (c)1st derivative spectrum; (d) absorption coefficient
    Correlation coefficients between selected phytoplankton pigments concentration and derivative spectra. (a)(b) 1st derivative spectra; (c)(d) 2nd derivative spectra; (e)(f) 4th derivative spectra
    Comparison between the predicted value from the PLS model based on 2nd derivative spectrum and the measured pigment concentrations for the validation data set, in which the 1∶1 ratio is shown as a solid line. (a) TChl a; (b) PSC; (c) PPC; (d) 19But; (e) Fuco; (f) 19Hex; (g) Diadino; (h) Zea
    Comparison between the predicted value from the PLS model based on 4th derivative spectrum and the measured pigment concentrations for the validation data set, in which the 1∶1 ratio is shown as a solid line. (a) TChl a; (b) PSC; (c) PPC; (d) 19But; (e) Fuco; (f) 19Hex; (g) Diadino; (h) Zea
    Comparison of the validation results between the PLS regression model based on the 2nd and 4th derivative spectra and the empirical model based on total TChl a concentration. (a) Determination coefficient R2 for linear regression between the predicted and measured pigment concentrations; (b) RMSE; (c) median percent difference; (d) mean percent difference
    Validation results of the PLS regression model based on the 2nd derivative spectrum and data collected in different months. (a) Determination coefficient R2 for linear regression between the predicted and measured pigment concentrations; (b) RMSE; (c) median percent difference; (d) mean percent difference
    • Table 1. Cruise information in the South China Sea between 2006—2015

      View table

      Table 1. Cruise information in the South China Sea between 2006—2015

      CruisePeriodNumber of samples
      200609 KFHC2006.0924
      200708 KFHC2007.0827
      200808 KFHC2008.0814
      200909 KFHC2009.0948
      201004 NSFC2010.0489
      201212 NSFC2012.1297
      201308 NSFC2013.0837
      201506 NSFC2015.0695
    • Table 2. Used pigments and their abbreviations

      View table

      Table 2. Used pigments and their abbreviations

      Pigment nameAbbreviation
      Chlorophyll aChl a
      Chlorophyll bChl b
      Chlorophyll c1,c2Chl c1+2
      Chlorophyll c3Chl c3
      Divinyl Chlorophyll aDV Chla
      FucoxanthinFuco
      PeridininPerid
      19'-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin19Hex
      ZeaxanthinZea
      19'-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin19But
      AlloxanthinAllo
      DiadinoxanthinDiadino
      β-caroteneβ caro
    • Table 3. Statistical distribution of different pigments, and the correlation coefficients R of log-transformed concentrations between accessory pigments and total Chlorophyll a (N=431)

      View table

      Table 3. Statistical distribution of different pigments, and the correlation coefficients R of log-transformed concentrations between accessory pigments and total Chlorophyll a (N=431)

      PigmentRangeMeanStandard deviationCorrelation coefficient R
      TChl a[0.027,2.317]0.2620.2611.00
      PSC[0.007,1.029]0.0870.1150.87
      PPC[0.011,0.442]0.0910.0470.58
      19But[0.001,0.205]0.0200.0290.78
      Fuco[0.001,0.888]0.0270.0720.78
      19Hex[0.004,0.209]0.0350.0360.84
      Diadino[0.001,0.070]0.0070.0080.72
      Zea[0.001,0.355]0.0620.0340.03
    • Table 4. PLS parameters of 2nd derivative spectrum and 4th derivative spectrum models

      View table

      Table 4. PLS parameters of 2nd derivative spectrum and 4th derivative spectrum models

      PLS modelPigmentNRMSE /(mg·m-3)ηx/%ηy/%R2ab
      Based on 2ndderivative spectrumTChl a70.12987.9279.270.720.7610.060
      PSC40.05482.6979.110.740.7480.019
      PPC40.03482.2347.330.380.4130.052
      19But30.01780.1566.520.630.6460.006
      Fuco50.03584.6283.760.720.7250.006
      19Hex30.02379.4963.270.570.6170.013
      Diadino80.00489.8680.580.720.7450.002
      Zea40.02782.2239.180.280.3150.044
      Based on 4thderivative spectrumTChl a60.13975.2775.940.680.7160.071
      PSC50.05772.3677.620.700.7180.022
      PPC120.03689.4252.550.300.3920.054
      19But50.01873.8866.350.590.6260.006
      Fuco50.04069.8578.200.640.6470.008
      19Hex20.02258.2261.500.580.6040.013
      Diadino60.00475.0476.450.670.7110.002
      Zea120.02889.4443.450.200.2740.046
    • Table 5. Validation results for the PLS model based on the 2nd and 4th derivative spectra

      View table

      Table 5. Validation results for the PLS model based on the 2nd and 4th derivative spectra

      PLS modelPigmentR2abRMSE /(mg·m-3)NΔMDPD /%ΔMPD /%
      PLS model based on 2ndderivative spectrumTChl a0.750.6150.0740.169024.9937.83
      PSC0.970.7140.0110.049025.8336.00
      PPC0.540.2960.0560.045021.8531.41
      19But0.830.7040.0070.014030.9562.03
      Fuco0.880.5580.0060.0453175.01118.31
      19Hex0.820.6990.0120.017027.0342.87
      Diadino0.730.5430.0020.006130.7237.83
      Zea0.590.2830.0400.033028.69114.26
      PLS model based on 4thderivative spectrumTChl a0.720.5630.0890.180127.2943.65
      PSC0.890.6360.0200.063333.2251.14
      PPC0.380.2890.0560.048023.7937.18
      19But0.800.6880.0070.015132.1370.45
      Fuco0.670.4150.0100.0603380.94153.48
      19Hex0.830.6690.0090.018121.6533.50
      Diadino0.710.4610.0030.006024.0835.88
      Zea0.430.2900.0380.034235.64103.47
    • Table 6. Empirical model's coefficients(A,B) based on TChl a and the validation results

      View table

      Table 6. Empirical model's coefficients(A,B) based on TChl a and the validation results

      PigmentABR2abRMSE /(mg·m-3)ΔMDPD /%ΔMPD /%
      PSC0.3721.1440.830.8080.0130.05734.9141.82
      PPC0.1490.3100.280.2360.0750.04920.6242.17
      19But0.0630.8050.440.3660.0130.02563.85118.41
      Fuco0.1721.9120.590.6560.0090.05848.2563.89
      19Hex0.0990.7010.750.5830.0160.02133.3556.19
      Diadino0.0260.9770.840.7420.0020.00424.1728.44
      Zea0.0790.1280.000.0090.0660.04426.78212.20
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Guifen Wang, Yinxue Zhang, Wenlong Xu, Wen Zhou, Hualian Wu, Zhantang Xu, Wenxi Cao. Estimation of Phytoplankton Pigment Concentration in the South China Sea from Hyperspectral Absorption Data[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(6): 0601002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics

    Received: Sep. 14, 2020

    Accepted: Nov. 9, 2020

    Published Online: Apr. 7, 2021

    The Author Email: Wang Guifen (guifenwang@hhu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202141.0601002

    Topics