Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 43, Issue 18, 1899912(2023)

Advances in UAV Laser Monitoring Technology for Pollutant Gases

Gang Wang1,2, Hongpeng Wu1,2, Jielin Liao3, Yongfeng Wei3, Jianbo Qiao3, and Lei Dong1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Laser Spectroscopy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
  • 3Shanxi Dop Technology Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Classification results of UAVs based on aerodynamics, landing, size, and performance [26-36]
    Photographs of 3D printed mini-MPC[42]. (a) Seven nonintersecting-circle spot pattern; (b) ray trajectories between two spherical mirrors; (c) mini-MPC with a gas inlet and an outlet; (d) top view of the mini-MPC
    Photograph of QTF-thermal detector [50]
    External and internal images of non-distributed infrared sensor [43]
    Optical fiber coupled photoacoustic detection module[64]. (a) CAD image of photoacoustic detection module; (b) photo of photoacoustic detection module
    A side-by-side comparison of conventional QEPAS and BF-QEPAS techniques[66]
    Schematic of airborne sensing system
    A UAV carries a miniaturized methane gas sensor [82]
    Photographs of the gas sensing platform based on a helicopter UAV[83]. (a) Multi-pass cell in the vertical cavity surface emitting lasers sensor; (b) helicopter UAV with VCSEL sensor onboard
    Photographs of non-dispersive infrared gas sensor based on UAV[84]. (a) Components of the portable CO2 sensor system setup; (b) selected multirotor UAV
    Photograph and schematic of non-dispersive infrared gas monitoring platform based on UAV[85]
    • Table 1. Classification of UAVs based on size and performance[36-39]

      View table

      Table 1. Classification of UAVs based on size and performance[36-39]

      Type of UAVsMaximum mass /kgMaximum range /kmMaximum altitude /kmFlight duration /hCategory of UAVs

      Nano

      Micro

      Light

      Small

      MALE

      HALE

      0.2

      2.0

      50.0

      150.0

      1000.0

      1000.0

      5

      25

      70

      150

      200

      250

      0.3

      1.5

      3.0

      5.0

      9.0

      20.0

      0.05-0.17

      0.17-0.50

      0.50-1.00

      1.00-2.00

      5.00-9.00

      10.00-20.00

      Fixed wing/multirotor

      Fixed wing/multirotor

      Fixed wing/multirotor

      Fixed wing

      Fixed wing

      Fixed wing

    • Table 2. Indicators of airborne laser monitoring technologies [40-67]

      View table

      Table 2. Indicators of airborne laser monitoring technologies [40-67]

      TechniqueSize of sensing unit /(cm×cm×cm)Light sourceDetection limit(gas type)
      TDLAS17×6.5×5.53.59 μm ICL3×10-9(H2CO)
      3.3 μm ICL5×10-9(CH4
      3.3 μm ICL8×10-9(C2H6
      NDIR4×4×61.65 μm DFB117×10-9(CH4
      0.2×0.2×0.24.2 μm LED1×10-6(CO2
      10×4×33.3 μm LED7×10-9(CO2
      QEPAS0.6×0.14×0.023.3 μm LED200×10-9(CH4
      0.28 μm LED200×10-9(O3
      1.53 μm DFB85×10-9(C2H2
      1.53 μm DFB418×10-9(NH3
      1.58 μm DFB734×10-9(H2S)
      3.34 μm ICL7×10-9(C2H6
      4.3 μm QCL0.3×10-9(CO2
      4.6 μm QCL1.5×10-9(CO)
      5.26 μm QCL5×10-9(NO)
    • Table 3. Comparison of available UAV simulators [66,68]

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of available UAV simulators [66,68]

      SimulatorJMavSimGazeboFlightGearX-PlaneAir Sim

      Commercial/free

      Interface ROS

      Motion capture

      Obstacles

      MAVLink

      Ease of Development

      Free

      Yes

      No

      No

      Yes

      High

      Free

      Yes

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      High

      Free

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Medium

      Commercial

      No

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Medium

      Free

      No

      Yes

      Yes

      Yes

      Medium

    • Table 4. Comparison between GCS software [73-75]

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison between GCS software [73-75]

      GCS softwareQGroundControlMission PlannerMAVProxy

      Interface

      Support MAVLink

      Platform for Android

      Graphical

      Yes

      Yes

      Graphical

      Yes

      No

      Command

      Yes

      No

      Pilot

      PX4 Pro

      ArduPilot

      MAVLink

      compatible

      Ardupilot

      PX4

      Ardupilot

      MAVLink

      compatible

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Gang Wang, Hongpeng Wu, Jielin Liao, Yongfeng Wei, Jianbo Qiao, Lei Dong. Advances in UAV Laser Monitoring Technology for Pollutant Gases[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(18): 1899912

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Feb. 3, 2023

    Accepted: Apr. 3, 2023

    Published Online: Sep. 14, 2023

    The Author Email: Dong Lei (donglei@sxu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS230504

    Topics