Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 51, Issue 24, 2402304(2024)

Shape-Performance Testing and Engineering Application of Antenna Components Formed by Selected Laser Melting Components for Space Service Environment

Tianyu Chen*, Jie Bao, and Yong Kong
Author Affiliations
  • Nanjing Electronic Equipment Research Institute, Nanjing 211103, Jiangsu , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(18)
    Prediction of part surface deviation. (a) Top view of antenna body; (b) bottom view of antenna body; (c) antenna bracket; (d) installation plate
    Stress and failure prediction of parts. (a) Stress analysis of antenna body; (b) failure analysis of antenna body; (c) stress analysis of antenna bracket; (d) failure analysis of antenna bracket; (e) stress analysis of installation plate; (f) failure analysis of installation board
    Deviation prediction of anti-deformation parts. (a) Top view of antenna body; (b) bottom view of antenna body; (c) antenna bracket; (d) installation board
    Stress and failure prediction of anti-deformation parts. (a) Stress analysis of antenna body; (b) failure analysis of antenna body; (c) stress analysis of antenna bracket; (d) failure analysis of antenna bracket; (e) stress analysis of installation plate; (f) failure analysis of installation board
    Impact response spectrum test. (a) X-direction; (b) Y-direction; (c) Z-direction
    Sine/random vibration test. (a) X-direction; (b) Y-direction; (c) Z-direction
    Thermal vacuum test
    Part contour defects before and after contour scanning. (a) Before contour scanning; (b)after contour scanning
    • Table 1. Process parameters

      View table

      Table 1. Process parameters

      ParameterContour velocity /(mm/s)Filling speed /(mm/s)Supporting speed /(mm/s)Contour power /WFilling power /WSupporting power /W
      Value50016001400340420350
    • Table 2. Scanning strategy

      View table

      Table 2. Scanning strategy

      ParameterFill spacing S /mmRotation angle θ /(°)Area width /mmArea size /mmMinimum bandwidth /mm
      Value0.166710610
    • Table 3. Element contents of AlSi10Mg alloy powder

      View table

      Table 3. Element contents of AlSi10Mg alloy powder

      ElementAlSiMgCuMnNiFeTiC
      Mass fraction /%6.4000100.000030.0000340.0000420.0000≤0.0500≤0.5500≤0.1500≤0.0075
    • Table 4. Deviations of part key feature sizes

      View table

      Table 4. Deviations of part key feature sizes

      PartPositionDesigned value /mmActual value /mmDeviation /mm
      Antenna bodyOuter edge outer diameter82.582.750.25
      Base distance32.032.050.05
      Antenna bracketHeight136.0136.200.20
      Inner diameter of upper mounting surface73.673.200.40
      Outer diameter of upper mounting surface90.090.100.10
      Outer diameter of lower mounting surface104.0104.080.08
      Installation boardInner diameter of upper mounting surface85.084.550.45
      Outer contour of upper mounting surface 190.090.250.25
      Outer contour of upper mounting surface 2200.0200.180.18
      Distance from upper surface to inside of mounting plate36.035.940.06
    • Table 5. Deviations of pore-like key feature sizes

      View table

      Table 5. Deviations of pore-like key feature sizes

      ParameterHole 1Hole 2Hole 3Hole 4Hole 5Hole 6
      Designed size /mm2.052.802.80±0.103.004.504.60
      Actual size /mm2.372.642.602.784.484.24
      Deviation /mm0.320.160.100.220.020.36
    • Table 6. Deviation of thin-walled key feature sizes

      View table

      Table 6. Deviation of thin-walled key feature sizes

      ParameterThin wall 1Thin wall 2Thin wall 3Thin wall 4
      Designed size /mm1.411.392.002.00
      Actual size /mm1.591.502.002.00
      Deviation /mm0.0190.11000
    • Table 7. Sample hardness test data

      View table

      Table 7. Sample hardness test data

      Sample stateDetected value /HVAverage value /HV
      FirstSecondThird
      Sedimentary state123124123123
      Heat treated state116113115115
    • Table 8. Sample tensile test data

      View table

      Table 8. Sample tensile test data

      Sample stateAverage tensile strength Rm /MPaAverage plastic elongation strength RP0.2 /MPaAverage elongation after fracture /%Average area reduction /%
      Sedimentary state4992586.810.7
      Heat treated state25617316.541.3
    • Table 9. Analysis of part compensation effect

      View table

      Table 9. Analysis of part compensation effect

      PartMaximum deformation deviation /mmMaximum equivalent stress /MPaForming risk
      Before optimizationAfter optimizationBefore optimizationAfter optimizationBefore optimizationAfter optimization
      Antenna body0.250.03368.37364.35Local high riskLocal medium risk
      Antenna bracket0.380.23368.39364.41Local medium riskLocal medium risk
      Installation board0.850.10259.69251.44No riskNo risk
    • Table 10. Error analysis of deformation values between anti-deformation and actual parts

      View table

      Table 10. Error analysis of deformation values between anti-deformation and actual parts

      PartMaximum simulated deformation /mmMaximum actual deformation /mmError /%
      Antenna body0.030.0540.0
      Antenna bracket0.230.4042.5
      Installation board0.100.1844.4
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tianyu Chen, Jie Bao, Yong Kong. Shape-Performance Testing and Engineering Application of Antenna Components Formed by Selected Laser Melting Components for Space Service Environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(24): 2402304

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Laser Additive Manufacturing

    Received: Apr. 7, 2024

    Accepted: May. 20, 2024

    Published Online: Dec. 10, 2024

    The Author Email: Tianyu Chen (cty15061772687@sina.com)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL240747

    CSTR:32183.14.CJL240747

    Topics