Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Staring Imaging Degraded Model

Fig. 5. (a) Original image; (b) bilinear interpolation; (c) reconstruction of passive view; (d) reconstruction of ICSM algorithm; (e)(f)(g)(h) corresponding details

Download full size

Fig. 6. Reconstruction images of different algorithms. (a) Superresolution_v_2.0 software; (b) SR software; (c) IBP algorithm; (d) ICSM algorithm

Download full size

Fig. 7. Influence of frame number on reconstruction effect using the four algorithms. (a) Entropy; (b) gray mean grads; (c) spatial frequency; (d) standard deviation

Download full size

Fig. 8. Satellite reconstruction images of different definitions. (a) Initial image entering orbit; (b) image after the first focusing; (c) image after the focusing completed; (d)(e)(f) corresponding reconstruction images of ICSM algorithm

Download full size

Table 1. Super-resolution reconstruction image evaluated by different objective indexes
View table
Table 1. Super-resolution reconstruction image evaluated by different objective indexes
Image Entropy Standard deviation Spatial frequency Gray mean grads
Fig. 5(a) 6.1008 20.1046 3.6564 13.4260
Fig. 5(b) 6.1102 20.6279 1.8456 7.1850
Fig. 5(c) 6.0190 19.8486 4.1856 5.0142
Fig. 5(d) 6.2777 22.5324 7.0371 19.9835

Table 2. Run time of different reconstruction algorithms
View table
Table 2. Run time of different reconstruction algorithms
Algorithm Superresolution_v_2.0 SR IBP ICSM
Time /s 16.41 2226.73 8.43 373.27

Table 3. Objective indexes to evaluate the different definitions images before and after super-resolution reconstruction

View table

Table 3. Objective indexes to evaluate the different definitions images before and after super-resolution reconstruction

Image	Entropy	Standard deviation	Spatial frequency	Gray mean grads
Fig. 8(a)	6.4758	23.6282	6.4163	25.4965
Fig. 8(b)	6.7404	28.8847	12.3757	33.9094
Fig. 8(c)	6.7218	36.3623	4.7364	14.0680
Fig. 8(d)	6.8615	37.7301	9.3411	23.3139
Fig. 8(e)	6.7043	23.0247	4.7364	8.9956
Fig. 8(f)	6.8136	34.3387	10.5559	22.6625

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Ye Yao, Yanfeng Qiao, Xing Zhong, Shuhai Yu, Lu Dai, Yang Bai. Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Staring Imaging Degraded Model[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 0810003

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Image Processing

Received: Mar. 29, 2017

Accepted: --

Published Online: Sep. 7, 2018

The Author Email: Zhong Xing (ciomper@163.com)

DOI:10.3788/AOS201737.0810003

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Super-resolution reconstruction image evaluated by different objective indexes

Table 1. Super-resolution reconstruction image evaluated by different objective indexes

Table 2. Run time of different reconstruction algorithms

Table 2. Run time of different reconstruction algorithms

Table 3. Objective indexes to evaluate the different definitions images before and after super-resolution reconstruction

Table 3. Objective indexes to evaluate the different definitions images before and after super-resolution reconstruction