NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 48, Issue 1, 010502(2025)

The choice of equivalent dose fitting function in ESR dating of old fossil samples

Junqi XIE1, Fei HAN1、*, Hualin LIU1, Manchen HUANG1, and Feng GAO2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Earth System Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
  • 2Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Kunming 650118, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(6)
    Location distribution of Late Miocene-Early Pleistocene sites
    Comparison of DE value of 17 enamel samples calculated by three fitting functions
    The Evolution of DE-SSE values along with the Dmax in 17 samples (The DE-DSE value and associated error (2σ) which under the condition of Dmax=50 kGy are shown with a solid and dash line, respectively; Fig.3(a~q) are arranged from high to low according to the DE-DSE of 17 samples)
    Correlation diagram between the deviation percentage of DE value of fossil samples and Dmax/DE value (Fig.4(a~q) is arranged in the same order as Fig.3)
    • Table 1. Site information of fossil samples used in this paper

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Site information of fossil samples used in this paper

      遗址名称Sites位置Location样品编号Sample No.牙化石种属Species生物地层年龄Biostratigraphic age
      三门峡Sanmenxia河南三门峡SanmenxiaSMX犀牛Rhino晚上新世Late Pliocene
      云南雷老Leilao云南元谋YuanmouLL9905-T1-1牙齿残片Tooth fragments晚中新世Late Miocene
      LL9905-T1-2犀牛Rhino
      LL9905-T1-3
      LL9905-T1-4
      LL9905-T1-5牛科Bovidae
      云南小河Xiaohe云南元谋YuanmouXH8704-1犀牛Rhino晚中新世Late Miocene
      XH9002-T12-1a
      XH9002-T12-1b
      XH9002-T12-1c
      泥河湾黑土沟Heitugou河北阳原YangyuanHTG-1牙齿残片Tooth fragments早更新世Early Pleistocene
      HTG-2
      HTG-3
      HTG-4
      巍山Weishan云南巍山WeishanWS-1犀牛Rhino晚中新世Late Miocene
      缅甸Burma缅甸仁安羌YenangyaungBURMA CD鳄鱼Crocodile晚中新世-上新世Late Miocene-Pliocene
      盐井沟Yanjinggou重庆万州WanzhouYJG剑齿象Stegodon早-中更新世Early-Middle Pleistocene
    • Table 2. The precision and goodness of DE fitting by DSE, SSE and EPL function and the discrepancy of their results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The precision and goodness of DE fitting by DSE, SSE and EPL function and the discrepancy of their results

      样品编号

      Sample No.

      DSE函数拟合结果

      DSE fitting result

      SSE函数拟合结果

      SSE fitting result

      EPL函数拟合结果

      EPL fitting result

      DE-DSE

      / Gy

      误差

      Error / Gy

      Adjust R2

      DE-SSE

      / Gy

      误差

      Error

      / Gy

      Adjust R2

      偏差

      Discrepancy

      / %

      DE-EPL

      / Gy

      误差Error

      / Gy

      Adjust R2

      偏差

      Discrepancy

      / %

      SMX7 019.611 620.960.981 17 019.61646.440.984 00.006 924.181 005.730.982 7-1.36
      LL9905-T1-17 661.991 350.710.989 07 661.91534.820.990 70.008 710.27827.440.992 513.68
      LL9905-T1-23 647.55998.960.998 96 135.41220.730.997 668.215 573.26226.230.998 652.79
      LL9905-T1-34 115.09914.910.998 65 545.28188.670.997 834.755 101.30199.630.998 623.97
      LL9905-T1-45 210.53384.580.998 26 247.06315.840.995 219.895 210.48241.780.998 30.00
      LL9905-T1-54 278.45626.460.998 85 494.94193.350.997 628.434 997.76196.200.998 616.81
      XH8704-15 249.64750.800.989 95 249.61341.590.991 50.005 547.83509.360.991 45.68
      XH9002-T12-1a3 366.46442.630.997 84 519.22234.880.994 934.243 934.33218.690.997 216.87
      XH9002-T12-1b5 148.97464.780.996 35 148.97202.490.996 80.005 215.05309.500.996 60.71
      XH9002-T12-1c4 984.45699.830.991 14 984.46306.400.992 40.004 936.10453.260.991 8-0.97
      HTG-17 005.911 142.150.990 57 005.91454.070.992 00.007 285.07720.750.991 53.98
      HTG-27 188.67884.380.994 77 188.71348.680.995 50.007 326.34556.130.995 21.92
      HTG-37 645.001 034.220.990 67 645.00500.040.992 00.007 441.44778.710.991 4-2.66
      HTG-47 625.58856.970.995 97 625.58326.530.996 50.007 788.22522.170.996 32.13
      WS-15 726.001 004.380.985 85 726.00446.660.988 00.005 914.02690.180.987 23.28
      MD2 309.56325.460.998 33 623.14208.470.993 656.883 098.23176.850.996 934.15
      YJG3 004.12389.170.991 83 597.90228.360.987 619.773 005.27272.120.992 50.04
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Junqi XIE, Fei HAN, Hualin LIU, Manchen HUANG, Feng GAO. The choice of equivalent dose fitting function in ESR dating of old fossil samples[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2025, 48(1): 010502

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: NUCLEAR PHYSICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

    Received: Jun. 24, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Feb. 26, 2025

    The Author Email: HAN Fei (韩非)

    DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2025.hjs.48.240259

    Topics