An operational effectiveness evaluation method for surface warships in complex operational test environment

作战对抗强度	战役场景含义	战术场景含义
简单	蓝盟不参与，以T，Y等为作战对象	单向单波1～2枚同型号导弹/单向1枚鱼雷威胁
一般	蓝盟仅提供情报支援，以T，Y等为作战对象	双向单波2～4枚不同型号导弹/单向1枚鱼雷威胁
较强	蓝盟提供多维信息作战，以T，Y等为作战对象	双向双波5～7枚不同型号导弹/双向2枚鱼雷威胁
强	蓝盟直接参与信息系统和火力系统一体化打击，双航母群以上打击力量介入	双向双波9～11枚不同型号导弹/双向多波3枚鱼雷威胁
复杂	蓝盟战略意志对撞，局部战争向全面战争蔓延	多向多波大于11枚不同型号导弹/多向多波大于3枚鱼雷威胁

Table 2. Grading of electromagnetic environment（radar equip-ment taken as an example)

View table

View in Article

Table 2. Grading of electromagnetic environment（radar equip-ment taken as an example)

电磁环境级别	干信比(J/S)/dB	保精度探测空域退化度Q/%
Ⅰ级（简单）	0＜J/S＜10	95＜Q＜100
Ⅱ级（轻度）	10≤J/S＜20	95≤Q＜85
Ⅲ级（中度）	20≤J/S＜30	85≤Q＜60
Ⅳ级（重度）	J/S≥30	60≤Q＜0

Table 3. Index importance value selection of elements in judgment matrix B

View table

View in Article

Table 3. Index importance value selection of elements in judgment matrix B

相对重要程度	定义	说明
1	同等重要	2个指标同样重要
3	略微重要	由经验或判断，认为一个指标比另一个指标略微重要
5	相当重要	由经验或判断，认为一个指标比另一个指标重要
7	明显重要	深感一个指标比另一个指标重要，且这种重要性已有实践证明
9	绝对重要	强烈地感到一个指标比另一个指标重要得多
2，4，6，8	2个相邻判断的中间值	需要折中时采用
倒数		2个指标相互比较时互为倒数

Table 4. The value selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment

View table

View in Article

Table 4. The value selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment

评估指标		作战对抗强度					电磁环境
评估指标		简单	一般	较强	强	复杂	简单	轻度	中度	重度
警戒探测跟踪能力	对飞机目标探测距离	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	0.7
	对导弹目标探测距离	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	0.7
	对飞机目标跟踪精度	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	0.7
	对导弹目标跟踪精度	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	0.7
	空中目标探测批数	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
	空中目标跟踪批数	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
指挥控制能力	对空方案生成时间	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
	对空决策区范围	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
	对空方案目标数量	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
武器打击能力	对空武器反应时间	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
	对空武器打击范围	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.8	0.7
	对空武器目标批数	1.0	0.9	0.8	0.7	0.6	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
	对空武器命中概率	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	0.9	0.7	0.5

Table 5. The weight selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment
View table
View in Article
Table 5. The weight selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment
作战对抗强度电磁环境
简单一般较强强复杂简单轻度中度重度
0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2

Table 6. The judgment matrix of counter interception capability index
View table
View in Article
Table 6. The judgment matrix of counter interception capability index
能力特征反应时间打击范围目标批数命中概率
反应时间 1 1/2 1/2 1/2
打击范围 2 1 1 1
目标批数 2 1 1 1
命中概率 2 1 1 1

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Canxin FANG, Xingwang GUO. An operational effectiveness evaluation method for surface warships in complex operational test environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(3): 259

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Weapon, Electronic and Information System

Received: Aug. 19, 2022

Accepted: --

Published Online: Mar. 20, 2025

The Author Email:

DOI:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03048

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Grading of operational intensity

Table 1. Grading of operational intensity

Table 2. Grading of electromagnetic environment（radar equip-ment taken as an example)

Table 2. Grading of electromagnetic environment（radar equip-ment taken as an example)

Table 3. Index importance value selection of elements in judgment matrix B

Table 3. Index importance value selection of elements in judgment matrix B

Table 4. The value selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment

Table 4. The value selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment

Table 5. The weight selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment

Table 5. The weight selection of influence factors in complex battlefield environment

Table 6. The judgment matrix of counter interception capability index

Table 6. The judgment matrix of counter interception capability index