Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 55, Issue 6, 061502(2018)

Updating Method of Improved Gradient Threshold in Object Tracking

Xiaohong Ma*
Author Affiliations
  • Electrical and Electronic Experiment Teaching Center, Shannxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi 723000, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(6)
    Comparison of CLE between KCF and the proposed algorithms based on four videos. (a) BlurBody; (b) couple; (c) deer; (d) soccer
    Comparison of APCE and its threshold, and APCE gradient and its threshold (take the couple video as an example). (a) APCE curve of the proposed algorithm; (b) DifAPCE curve of the proposed algorithm; (c) APCE curve of the proposed algorithm (without the judgment of gradient threshold); (d) two frame changes corresponding to the label ring 4 in Fig. 2(b)
    Comparison of tracking performance with and without gradient threshold judgment. (a) Without gradient threshold; (b) with gradient threshold
    Qualitative tracking comparison of KCF (top) and proposed algorithms (bottom). (a) BlurBody; (b) couple; (c) soccer; (d) deer
    • Table 1. Comparison of accuracy and speed between KCF and the proposed algorithm (threshold value is 20 pixel)

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of accuracy and speed between KCF and the proposed algorithm (threshold value is 20 pixel)

      VideoKCFProposed algorithm
      DP /%Speed /(frame·s-1)DP /%Speed /(frame·s-1)
      Bird16.9176.316.9163.61
      Bird247.555.3649.555.27
      BlurBody58.451.4678.752.76
      Carscale80.6249.7980.6210.13
      Coke83.894.2084.983.85
      Couple25.7171.9763.6161.76
      Deer81.745.184.542.67
      Dragon Baby33.688.3032.191.50
      Dudek87.745.2787.744.59
      Ironman21.7110.6521.4106.71
      Jumping33.9242.9937.7215.77
      Lemming49.553.0749.552.36
      Liquor95.990.9695.285.49
      Matrix17.0152.4618.0133.38
      Motor Rolling4.370.954.968.42
      Soccer79.350.6086.550.25
      Surfer91.0391.0288.6347.65
      Tiger197.543.2397.539.84
      Tiger235.668.0235.967.76
      Vase79.3113.4084.1118.36
      Average value55.5118.2659.4109.53
    • Table 2. Comparison of tracking precision with and without gradient threshold judgment

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of tracking precision with and without gradient threshold judgment

      TrackerDP /%Speed /(frame·s-1)
      Without gradient threshold57.9166.01
      With gradient threshold63.6161.76
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaohong Ma. Updating Method of Improved Gradient Threshold in Object Tracking[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(6): 061502

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: Nov. 22, 2017

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 11, 2018

    The Author Email: Xiaohong Ma (42600969@qq.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP55.061502

    Topics