Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 13, 1306016(2025)

Research Status and Development Trends Analysis of Underwater Wireless Optical Communication (Invited)

Xiaotian Han1, Wenchao Nie1, Peng Li1, Guangying Li1, Chang Chang1, Pengfei Zhang1, Peixuan Liao1, Chenhua Xie1, Hui Li1, Wei Wang1、*, and Xiaoping Xie1,2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Photonics and Network, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, Shaanxi , China
  • 2Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, Sichuan , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Internal structure diagram and modulation bandwidth measurement results of micro-LED device[26]. (a) Structure diagram of micro-LED; (b) spectral measurement results; (c) normalized frequency response under different driving currents
    Test results for the system employing 16-QAM and OFDM technology[31]. (a) Error vector magnitude (EVM) and constellation diagram; (b) subcarrier signal-to-noise ratio and constellation diagram; (c) EVM of 2.4 Gbit/s 16-QAM OFDM data after underwater transmission over 1.7 m; (d) relationship between subcarrier and signal-to-noise ratio along with corresponding constellation diagrams
    Schematic diagrams of conventional underwater wireless optical communication systems employing Gaussian beams and adaptive links utilizing circularly symmetric self-focusing Airy beams[52]
    Concept of an underwater orbital angular momentum-multiplexing optical communication link and intensity distributions of Gaussian beams and orbital angular momentum beams under different conditions[59]. (a) Concept of an underwater orbital angular momentum-multiplexing optical communication link; (b) intensity distributions of the Gaussian beam and OAM l=+1, +3 beams under different conditions including tap water, water current, scattering, and turbulence; (c) eye diagrams after transmission through l=+3 OAM channel
    Underwater wireless optical communication experimental system based on 8th-order quadrature phase shift keying and coherent heterodyne detection technology[79]
    Underwater wireless optical communication prototype and sea test certificate developed by WHOI, USA[96]
    Engineering prototype and sea trial certificate for wireless optical communication in water system developed by IFREMER, France[99]
    Japan’s “1 Gbit/s×100 m underwater optical wireless communication” deep-sea experimental platform and sea trial prototype[100]
    Architecture for sea trial verification of high-speed underwater optical communication machines[93]
    LED-based underwater wireless optical communication engineering prototype developed by the Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and its sea trial verification
    Real-time monitoring system for subsea pipelines based on the integrated LED transceiver for deep-sea wireless blue-green optical communication technology
    Vision of an integrated communication, navigation, and timing (CNT) network for future air-space-ground-sea convergence[110]
    • Table 1. Comparison of underwater wireless communication systems[2,7]

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of underwater wireless communication systems[2,7]

      ParameterRadio frequencySoundLight
      Distance<10 m<20 km10‒100 m
      Attenuation coefficient3.5‒189 dB/m0.1‒4 dB/km0.13‒19.11 dB/m
      Transmission rate2.25×108 m/s1500 m/s2.25×108 m/s
      Data rateMbit/skbit/sGbit/s
      DelayMediumHighLow
      Power consumptionHighMediumLow
      Production costHighMediumLow
    • Table 2. Indicators on single-photon detector-based underwater high-sensitivity communication systems

      View table

      Table 2. Indicators on single-photon detector-based underwater high-sensitivity communication systems

      YearCommunication rateReception sensitivity /bit-1Link lossKey technologyRef.
      201650 kbit/s84.24OOK+photon counting[67]
      20161.3 Mbit/s~1104.1OOK+photon counting[68]
      201812 kbit/s0.33135.04256-PPM+photon counting[69]
      2021125 kbit/s10-5120.1Photon-inter-correlation communication[72]
      20231.9 Mbit/s0.3495.7632-PPM+photon counting[74]
      202510 Mbit/s16.094.8OOK+pulse width counting[76]
      2024390.63 kbit/s6.67101.76256-PPM+photon counting[77]
    • Table 3. Advances in underwater high-speed wireless optical communication technology research in recent years

      View table

      Table 3. Advances in underwater high-speed wireless optical communication technology research in recent years

      YearCommunicationdistance /mCommunication rateKey technologyRef.
      202020.09 Gbit/sRGB multiplexing+probabilistic shaping +DMT[55]
      2020563.31 Gbit/s32-QAM OFDM+equalizer[82]
      20211301 Gbit/sPAM4+linear post-equalizer[33]
      2021150500 Mbit/sTrellis-coded modulation[89]
      202223.8 Gbit/sPMA4+micro-LED[90]
      202224 Gbit/sPAM4+micro-LED+equalizer[27]
      20221003 Gbit/sOOK+BroadbandPMT[85]
      2022552 Gbit/sSiPM+nonlinear DFE[91]
      202390560 Mbit/sSMMP-CAP+SNR-WD+MC-DFE[36]
      2023124 Mbit/sLED array chip[92]
      20240.68 Gbit/sQPSK+coherent demodulation[79]
      2024351 Gbit/sLD array[93]
      202515 Gbit/s16-QAM OFDM+“pin-like” beam[53]
    • Table 4. Several wireless optical communication engineering prototypes both at home and abroad

      View table

      Table 4. Several wireless optical communication engineering prototypes both at home and abroad

      Research institute/companyModel numberTechnical characteristicsParameter
      RateDistanceWorking depth
      ZHENGJIANG UNIVERSITY[93]LDs+APD0.25 Gbit/s5 m@c=1.3077 m-110 m
      XIDIAN UNIVERSITY[101]LD+PMT100 Mbit/s
      BUPT[102]LDs+PMT6.25 Mbit/s80 m@c=0.069 m-1
      XIOPMXIOPM-ILD+PMT20 Mbit/s100 m@I-type water11000 m
      XIOPM-IILEDs+PMT25 Mbit/s105 m@I-type water11000 m
      XIOPM-IIILEDs+PMT20 Mbit/s187.5 m@I-type water11000 m
      SDFSO[103]LB50CCM-0/40W99LEDs/LDs+PMT

      ≤10 Mbit/s(LED),

      50 Mbit/s(LD)

      ≤80 m≤1000 m
      LB75CDM-0/40W99LEDs/LDs+PMT

      5 Mbit/s(LED),

      30 Mbit/s(LD)

      10‒100 m1000 m
      LB50CCM-0/40W99LEDs/LDs+PMT

      ≤10 Mbit/s(LED),

      50 Mbit/s(LD)

      ≤80 m≤1000 m
      LB30ABA-50/40W99LEDs+PMT≤10 Mbit/s≤50 m≤1000 m
      Hydromea[104]LUMA 500ERLEDs+OOK9.6‒512 kbit/s>50 m6000 m
      LUMA XLEDs+OOK>10 Mbit/s>50 m6000 m
      SA Photonics[105]NEPTUNEGreen/blue laser+QPSK250 Mbit/s100 m
      Sonardyne[106]BlueComm100LEDs+OOK5 Mbit/s15 m4000 m
      BlueComm 200LEDs+OOK12.5 Mbit/s100 m4000 m
      BlueComm 5000LD+OOK500 Mbit/s
      BlueComm HALLEDs+OOK5 Mbit/s20 m
      BlueComm OATSLEDs+OOK20 Mbit/s100 m>350 m
      SHIMADZU[107]MC500LD20 Mbit/s80 m>3000 m
      BORSYS[108]BOLcom-LRGreen/blue laser4 Mbit/s>200 m6000 m
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaotian Han, Wenchao Nie, Peng Li, Guangying Li, Chang Chang, Pengfei Zhang, Peixuan Liao, Chenhua Xie, Hui Li, Wei Wang, Xiaoping Xie. Research Status and Development Trends Analysis of Underwater Wireless Optical Communication (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(13): 1306016

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

    Received: May. 23, 2025

    Accepted: Jul. 1, 2025

    Published Online: Jul. 22, 2025

    The Author Email: Wei Wang (wangwei2012@opt.ac.cn), Xiaoping Xie (xxp@opt.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS251141

    Topics