Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 22, 2211001(2024)
Optimization and Efficient Computation of Mask Extension for Holographic Display Viewing Angle Method
Fig. 1. Diffraction pattern at 100 mm. (a) Result of traditional angular spectrum diffraction; (b) result of band-limited angular spectrum diffraction
Fig. 3. Principle diagram of mask extension for holographic display viewing angle of spatial light modulator. (a) Phase mask extension for holographic display viewing angle optical system structure; (b) schematic of resolution difference matching
Fig. 4. Band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS optimization algorithm based on phase mask extension for holographic display viewing angle method
Fig. 6. Layered hologram computation with additional random phase mask for three-dimensional holography
Fig. 9. Structure of transfer function lookup table for band-limited angular spectrum
Fig. 10. Hologram and its reconstruction results. (a) Original image; (b) hologram computed with traditional angular spectrum diffraction; (c) reconstruction result of traditional angular spectrum diffraction hologram; (d) hologram computed with band-limited angular spectrum diffraction; (e) reconstruction result of band-limited angular spectrum diffraction hologram; (f) hologram computed with band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration for 20 times; (g) reconstruction result of band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration for 20 times
Fig. 11. Comparison of results of reconstruction using traditional angular spectrum diffraction GS and band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS with time-averaging method respectively. (a) Original image; (b)‒(d) reconstruction images using traditional angular spectrum diffraction GS optimization for iteration 20 times combined with time-averaging method; (e)‒(g) reconstruction images using band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS optimization for iteration 20 times combined with time-averaging method
Fig. 12. Objective evaluation metrics for reconstruction results. (a) Speckle contrast; (b) SSIM; (c) PSNR
Fig. 13. Final reconstruction results. (a) Optimized final result from Ref. [10]; (b) optimized result of method in this paper (reconstruction of 20 holograms)
Fig. 14. Intensity and depth images of three-dimensional object. (a) Intensity image; (b) depth image
Fig. 15. Holograms with or without GS optimization and reconstruction images with holograms participating in focusing and head reconstruction. (a) Three-dimensional phase hologram without GS optimization; (b) three-dimensional phase hologram with GS optimization iteration for 40 times; (c) reconstruction image with 1 hologram without GS optimization participating in focusing and head reconstruction; (d) reconstruction image with 1 hologram with GS optimization iteration for 40 times participating in focusing and head reconstruction; (e) reconstruction image with 20 holograms without GS optimization participating in focusing and head reconstruction; (f) reconstruction image with 20 holograms with GS optimization iteration for 40 times participating in focusing and head reconstruction
Fig. 16. Local enlargement of three-dimensional reconstructed images. (a) Without GS optimization; (b) GS iteration for 40 times
Fig. 17. Before and after improvement, holograms and reconstruction results computed with band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration optimization. (a) Original image; (b) hologram computed with traditional angular spectrum diffraction; (c) reconstruction result of traditional angular spectrum diffraction hologram; (d) hologram computed with band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration for 20 times; (e) reconstruction result of band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration for 20 times; (f) improved hologram computed with band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration for 20 times; (g) reconstruction result of improved hologram computed with band-limited angular spectrum diffraction GS iteration for 20 times
Fig. 18. Holograms and reconstruction images computed with parallel computation with multiple streams and lookup table. (a) Hologram computed sequentially with 40 iterations; (b) hologram computed in parallel with 40 iterations; (c) reconstruction image of a single hologram computed sequentially; (d) reconstruction image of a single hologram computed in parallel; (e) reconstruction image of 20 holograms computed sequentially; (f) reconstruction image of 20 holograms computed in parallel; (g) local enlargement of reconstruction image with 20 holograms computed sequentially; (h) local enlargement of reconstruction image with 20 holograms computed in parallel
|
|
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Jiachen Kang, Shaowen Hao. Optimization and Efficient Computation of Mask Extension for Holographic Display Viewing Angle Method[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(22): 2211001
Category: Imaging Systems
Received: Feb. 21, 2024
Accepted: Mar. 12, 2024
Published Online: Nov. 13, 2024
The Author Email: Jiachen Kang (kangjc233@163.com), Shaowen Hao (hsw6826@163.com)
CSTR:32186.14.LOP240719