Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 38, Issue 7, 0712002(2018)

Method for Improving Measurement Accuracy of Wavelet Transform Profilometry

Cheng Zhang and Wenjing Chen*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Optical geometry of measurement system
    (a) Daughter wavelets with different scales; (b) Fourier spectra of daughter wavelets; (c) mother wavelets with different fb values; (d) Fourier spectra of mother wavelets
    (a) Deformed fringe pattern without noise; (b) wavelet ridges with different fb values; (c) unwrapped phase of Fig. 3(b); (d) wavelet ridges when fb is equal to 0.2; (e) unwrapped phase of Fig. 3(d)
    (a) Deformed fringe pattern considering random noise with mean square deviation of 0.20; (b) wavelet ridges with different fb values; (c) unwrapped phase of Fig. 4(b); (d) wavelet ridges introducing improved wavelet processing method; (e) unwrapped phase of improved wavelet processing method
    (a) Simulated object; (b) deformed fringe pattern
    Error distribution without noise. (a) fb=0.5; (b) fb=1.0; (c) fb=1.5; (d) fb=2.0
    Error considering random noise influence with mean square deviation of 0.20.(a) fb=0.5; (b) fb=1.0; (c) fb=1.5; (d) fb=2.0
    Results and error distribution considering random noise with mean square deviation of 0.20. (a) Reconstruction results by improved wavelet processing method; (b) reconstruction error distribution by improved wavelet processing method; (c) error distribution by method proposed by Liu et al.[8]
    (a) Deformed fringe with low noise; (b) fringe distribution of the 381th row in Fig. 9(a)
    (a) Unwrapped phase by employing improved wavelet processing method; (b) unwrapped phase of the 381th row of deformed fringe pattern
    (a) Deformed fringe pattern with high noise level; (b) fringe distribution of the 286th row in Fig. 11(a)
    (a) Wrapped phase when fb=1.0; (b) wrapped phase when fb=2.0; (c) unwrapped phase when fb=1.0; (d) unwrapped phase when fb=2.0; (e) wrapped phase extracted by method proposed by Liu et al.[8]; (f) wrapped phase extracted by improved wavelet processing method; (g) unwrapped phase extracted by method proposed by Liu et al[8]; (h) unwrapped phase extracted by improved wavelet processing method
    • Table 1. Standard deviation of reconstruction errors for complex Morlet wavelet method with different fb values and improved wavelet processing method at different noise levels

      View table

      Table 1. Standard deviation of reconstruction errors for complex Morlet wavelet method with different fb values and improved wavelet processing method at different noise levels

      Mean squaredeviation of noiseStandard deviation for improvedwavelet processing method /mmStandard deviation for complex Morlet wavelet method /mm
      fb=0.5fb=1.0fb=1.5fb=2.0
      00.07000.06990.10210.12970.1520
      0.050.07760.07660.10560.13200.1537
      0.100.09450.09350.11500.13840.1587
      0.150.11430.11540.12760.14650.1645
      0.200.13920.26450.26650.15970.1753
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Cheng Zhang, Wenjing Chen. Method for Improving Measurement Accuracy of Wavelet Transform Profilometry[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 0712002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

    Received: Dec. 5, 2017

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 5, 2018

    The Author Email: Chen Wenjing (chengwj0409@scu.end.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS201838.0712002

    Topics