Photonics Research, Volume. 7, Issue 11, 1229(2019)

Engineering of strong mechanical squeezing via the joint effect between Duffing nonlinearity and parametric pump driving

Cheng-Hua Bai1, Dong-Yang Wang1, Shou Zhang1,2,3, Shutian Liu1, and Hong-Fu Wang2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
  • 2Department of Physics, College of Science, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China
  • 3e-mail: szhang@ybu.edu.cn
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(9)
    Schematic diagram of the considered optomechanical system. An OPA is placed inside the cavity driven by an external laser field and is pumped by a parametric driving field. Here the movable mirror is coupled to the cavity field via the radiation-pressure interaction and is treated as a quantum-mechanical oscillator with a Duffing nonlinearity.
    Sketch of the physical processes of the joint effect between Duffing nonlinearity and parametric pump driving in construction of strong mechanical squeezing.
    Dependence of (a) the cavity mode phase mean square fluctuation ⟨δY2⟩ and (b) the mechanical mode position mean square fluctuation ⟨δQ2⟩ on the parametric gain G for the parametric phase θ∈[0,12π]. The horizontal dashed line represents the variance of the vacuum state. The frequency of the mechanical mode ωm/(2π)=2.5×106 Hz. Other parameters are ωc=2.5×108ωm, γm=10−6ωm, κ=0.1ωm, g0=10−4ωm, P=0.1 mW, nmth=ncth=0, and εL=2Pκ/(ℏωc).
    Dependence of the mechanical mode position mean square fluctuation ⟨δQ2⟩ on the parametric gain G in the cases of η=0 and η=10−5ωm. The parameter sets (G,η) corresponding to the points A, B, C, and D are (0,0), (0.4κ,0), (0,10−5ωm), and (0.4κ,10−5ωm), respectively. Here we have set θ=0, and other parameters are the same as in Fig. 3. The shadowed blue bottom region corresponds to squeezing below the 3 dB limit.
    Wigner function in the phase space for the mechanical mode. (a), (b), (c), and (d) correspond to the points A, B, C, and D in Fig. 4, respectively. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 4.
    Mechanical mode position mean square fluctuation ⟨δQ2⟩ obtained by the numerical solution in Eq. (25) and the analytical solution in Eq. (44), respectively, in the cases of η=0 and η=10−5ωm. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 4. The shadowed blue bottom region corresponds to squeezing below the 3 dB limit.
    Dependence of the mechanical mode position mean square fluctuation ⟨δQ2⟩ on the thermal phonon number nmth. Here we have set κ=0.2ωm, η=10−4ωm, G=0.49κ, θ=0, and P=10 mW. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 3. The shadowed blue bottom region corresponds to squeezing below the 3 dB limit.
    Contour plot of the detection spectrum SZout(ω) of the quadrature fluctuation of the output field versus the frequency ω and the measurement phase angle ϕ when G=0.4κ and η=10−5ωm. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 4.
    • Table 1. Applying Either (Both) of the Parametric Pump Driving and the Duffing Nonlinearity, the Sole (Joint) Squeezing Result (in Units of Decibels) of These Two Different Squeezing Methods in Different Parameter Sets of (P,G,η)a

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Applying Either (Both) of the Parametric Pump Driving and the Duffing Nonlinearity, the Sole (Joint) Squeezing Result (in Units of Decibels) of These Two Different Squeezing Methods in Different Parameter Sets of (P,G,η)a

      Power P(mW)Parametric Gain G/κNonlinearity η/ωmSqueezing Effect (G0,  η=0)Squeezing Effect (G=0,  η0)SuperpositionJoint Squeezing Effect (G0,  η0)
      0.10.301052.04122.33764.37884.3788
      0.10.301042.04123.40815.44935.4492
      0.50.351052.30453.83336.13786.1378
      0.50.351042.30454.89047.19497.1948
      1.00.401052.55274.47187.02457.0245
      1.00.401042.55275.51888.07158.0715
      2.00.451052.78755.10427.89177.8917
      2.00.451042.78756.14198.92948.9294
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Cheng-Hua Bai, Dong-Yang Wang, Shou Zhang, Shutian Liu, Hong-Fu Wang, "Engineering of strong mechanical squeezing via the joint effect between Duffing nonlinearity and parametric pump driving," Photonics Res. 7, 1229 (2019)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Quantum Optics

    Received: May. 7, 2019

    Accepted: Sep. 1, 2019

    Published Online: Oct. 22, 2019

    The Author Email: Hong-Fu Wang (hfwang@ybu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.7.001229

    Topics