Journals Articles Conferences News About CLP
Submit a paper Email Alert
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
2D MaterialsTransformation opticsQuantum PhotonicsSmall lasersSemiconductor UV PhotonicsSupersymmetric microring laser arrays

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 62, Issue 1, 0125001(2025)

Optimization Design of Filter Antenna Based on Improved Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm

Xiaotao Song*, Siguang An, Guoping Zou, Jiange Jiao, and Yongkang Peng
Author Affiliations
  • College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang , China
    • show less
    AbstractGet PDF(in Chinese)
    Figures&Tables (13)
    Equations (24)
    References (24)
    Tools
    Paper Information
    Topics
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Relationship between gray wolf social dominance hierarchy[9]

    Fig. 1. Relationship between gray wolf social dominance hierarchy[9]

    Download full size
    Schematic diagram of gray wolves surrounding and hunting prey

    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of gray wolves surrounding and hunting prey

    Download full size
    Grouping optimization diagram

    Fig. 3. Grouping optimization diagram

    Download full size
    Distribution of Tent chaotic maps

    Fig. 4. Distribution of Tent chaotic maps

    Download full size
    Map of individual distribution after clustering

    Fig. 5. Map of individual distribution after clustering

    Download full size
    Histogram of individual distribution after clustering

    Fig. 6. Histogram of individual distribution after clustering

    Download full size
    Comparison of improved control parameter

    Fig. 7. Comparison of improved control parameter

    Download full size
    The overall flow chart of the algorithm

    Fig. 8. The overall flow chart of the algorithm

    Download full size
    Structure diagram of the filter antenna

    Fig. 9. Structure diagram of the filter antenna

    Download full size
    Optimization results of filter antenna

    Fig. 10. Optimization results of filter antenna

    Download full size

    • Table 1. Algorithm performance comparison results

      View table

      Table 1. Algorithm performance comparison results

      Test functionIndexNSGWOMOGWONSWOAMOPSONSGA-Ⅱ
      ZDT1

      IGD

      HV

      5.6×10-3

      0.721

      6.6×10-2

      0.64

      6.2×10-3

      0.716

      1.6×10-2

      0.703

      1.65

      0

      ZDT2

      IGD

      HV

      5.2×10-3

      0.541

      6.7×10-3

      0.424

      7.9×10-3

      0.443

      1.5×10-2

      0.428

      3.66

      0

      ZDT3

      IGD

      HV

      6.0×10-3

      0.699

      1.4×10-2

      0.608

      5.2×10-3

      0.598

      1.6×10-2

      0.590

      1.10

      0

      ZDT4

      IGD

      HV

      4.2×10-3

      0.724

      3.2×10-2

      0.686

      5.6×10-3

      0.710

      3.5×10-2

      0.677

      1.79

      0

      ZDT6

      IGD

      HV

      4.1×10-3

      0.399

      5.6×10-2

      0.328

      4.7×10-3

      0.387

      0.24

      0.161

      6.73

      0

    • Table 2. Comparison of test function optimization results

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of test function optimization results

      Test functionIndexINSGWONSGWOMOGWO*NSWOA*MOPSO*NSGA-Ⅱ*
      ZDT1

      IGD

      HV

      3.2×10-3

      0.746

      5.6×10-3

      0.721

      1.5×10-2

      0.707

      5.2×10-3

      0.72

      1.3×10-2

      0.700

      0.15

      0.530

      ZDT2

      IGD

      HV

      4.7×10-3

      0.544

      5.2×10-3

      0.541

      8.7×10-3

      0.425

      4.6×10-3

      0.456

      1.4×10-2

      0.422

      0.14

      0.277

      ZDT3

      IGD

      HV

      5.0×10-3

      0.710

      6.0×10-3

      0.699

      1.1×10-2

      0.600

      5.0×10-3

      0.699

      1.3×10-2

      0.592

      0.26

      0.573

      ZDT4

      IGD

      HV

      3.5×10-3

      0.724

      4.2×10-3

      0.724

      0.39

      0.499

      4.6×10-3

      0.724

      2.3×10-3

      0.719

      4.2×10-3

      0.720

      ZDT6

      IGD

      HV

      3.5×10-3

      0.434

      4.1×10-3

      0.399

      2.6×10-2

      0.352

      3.8×10-3

      0.401

      1.3×10-1

      0.256

      3.2×10-1

      0.053

    • Table 3. Optimization results of filter antenna parameters

      View table

      Table 3. Optimization results of filter antenna parameters

      VariableLWw1w2w3w4w5w6w7xL1L2
      ResultINSGWO35.4325.572.030.757.622.400.520.240.452.504.501.35
      NSGWO34.3225.031.950.818.572.310.500.260.371.855.231.01
      NSWOA*34.0127.221.801.056.682.400.580.250.412.955.591.57
      VariableL3L4L5L6L7pxpy
      ResultINSGWO1.662.232.440.582.5014.127.50
      NSGWO1.551.802.650.712.3013.567.10
      NSWOA*1.852.012.500.702.4716.057.89
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaotao Song, Siguang An, Guoping Zou, Jiange Jiao, Yongkang Peng. Optimization Design of Filter Antenna Based on Improved Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(1): 0125001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Set citation alerts for article
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: OPTOELECTRONICS

    Received: Apr. 9, 2024

    Accepted: May. 22, 2024

    Published Online: Jan. 3, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/LOP241069

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP241069

    Topics

    laser devices and laser physics
    Lasers and Laser Optics
    Laser physics
    laser manufacturing
    Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology