Acta Physica Sinica, Volume. 69, Issue 7, 075201-1(2020)
Figures & Tables(6)
Fig. 1. Beam deflection simulation results at different incident intensity: (a) Transverse flow and average intensity lower than filamentation threshold; (b) transverse flow and average intensity higher than filamentation threshold.
Fig. 2. Comparison of spatial distribution of laser electric field between laser entrance and exit planes as beam deflection presents: (a) Laser entrance plane; (b) laser exit plane.
Fig. 3. Propagation of SSD beam at modulation frequency of 10–3ω0: (a) Corresponding simulation result at 11000 th laser periods; (b) corresponding simulation result at 13750 th laser periods.
Fig. 4. Propagation of SSD beam with transverse flow at modulation frequency of 10–3 ω0: (a) Corresponding simulation result at 11000 th laser periods; (b) corresponding simulation result at 13750th laser periods.
Fig. 5. Propagation of SSD beam at modulation frequency of 10–4ω0: (a) No transverse flow; (b) the transverse flow speed equals ion sound speed.
Table 1. Simulation results for filamentaion and beam deflection in the case of CPP smoothed beam Φ200.
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Simulation results for filamentaion and beam deflection in the case of CPP smoothed beam Φ200.
模型 光斑平均强度/ ${\rm{W} } \cdot {\rm{c} }{ {\rm{m} }^{ {\rm{ - 2} } } }$ 成丝现象 束偏折现象 1 4.30 × 1013 否 否 2 3.86 × 1014 否 否 3 1.07 × 1015 是 是 4 2.11 × 1015 是 是 5 3.49 × 1015 是 是
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Bin Li, Zhan-Jun Liu, Liang Hao, Chun-Yang Zheng, Hong-Bo Cai, Min-Qing He.
Paper Information
Category:
Received: Oct. 28, 2019
Accepted: --
Published Online: Nov. 20, 2020
The Author Email: Hao Liang (hao_liang@iapcm.ac.cn)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20