Chinese Journal of Ship Research, Volume. 19, Issue 6, 150(2024)

Research on equipment layout optimization of ship engine room based on two-stage multi-objective intelligent design method

Jincheng LI1, Tun LIU1, Bo LING1, Zhenqiao ZHU1, Mengxiong YE1, Shuling YANG2,3, Yukun FENG2,3, and Zuogang CHEN2,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan 430205, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(25)
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    • Table 1. Equipment parameter table

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Equipment parameter table

      序号设备数量/台尺寸(长×宽)/mm维检修权重
      A112 300×7000.8
      A212 700×7000.8
      A321 800×7000.8
      A421900×7000.6
      A521 300×6000.6
      A61900×6000.5
      B111 000×5000.3
      B211 000×5000.3
      B31500×4000.1
      B41300×2500.3
      B52300×2500.3
      C111 000×5000.4
      C211 200×4000.4
      C31800×4500.4
      C41400×4000.4
    • Table 2. Objective function values of each layout plan

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Objective function values of each layout plan

      方案编号维检修路径总长度/m通道最大宽度及维修空间/m剩余有效空间/m2
      123.955 01.473 89.825 6
      211.612 51.431 05.888 0
      314.185 01.473 84.939 9
    • Table 3. Comparison of objective function values for two-stage optimized layout plans

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of objective function values for two-stage optimized layout plans

      维检修路径总长度/m通道最大宽度及维修空间/m剩余有效空间/ m2
      阶段123.955 01.473 89.825 6
      阶段212.052 51.922 39.988 0
    • Table 4. Comparison between the optimized and the original layout plan

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison between the optimized and the original layout plan

      维检修路径总长度/m通道最大宽度及维修空间/m剩余有效空间/m2
      优化布置方案12.051.922 39.988 0
      原型14.551.914 37.489 6
      优化效果/%17.180.4733.36
    • Table 5. Hyperparameter analysis of optimization algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Hyperparameter analysis of optimization algorithms

      超参数(交叉率,变异率)维检修路径总长度/m通道最大宽度及维修空间/m剩余有效空间/m2
      (0.85,0.2)12.052 51.922 39.988 0
      (0.85,0.4)11.317 51.915 09.587 2
      (0.65,0.2)12.542 51.902 510.029 1
      (0.65,0.4)11.475 21.915 69.543 6
    • Table 6. Analysis of the effectiveness of elite strategies

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Analysis of the effectiveness of elite strategies

      有精英策略遗传优化无精英策略遗传优化
      维检修路径总长度/m12.052 516.100 0
      通道最大宽度及维修空间/m1.922 31.905 0
      剩余有效空间/m29.988 08.843 0
    • Table 7. Analysis of grid size

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Analysis of grid size

      网格尺寸/mm
      25×2550×50100×100
      维检修路径总长度/m11.562 412.052 512.050 0
      通道最大宽度及维修空间/m1.910 71.922 31.907 5
      剩余有效空间/m210.035 49.988 08.988 4
    • Table 8. Validation of the method generality

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8. Validation of the method generality

      NSGA-II粒子群算法
      维检修路径总长度/m12.052 515.255 0
      通道最大宽度及维修空间/m1.922 31.905 0
      剩余有效空间/m29.988 08.843 0
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jincheng LI, Tun LIU, Bo LING, Zhenqiao ZHU, Mengxiong YE, Shuling YANG, Yukun FENG, Zuogang CHEN. Research on equipment layout optimization of ship engine room based on two-stage multi-objective intelligent design method[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2024, 19(6): 150

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Theory and Method of Intelligent Design for Ship and Ocean Engineering

    Received: May. 29, 2024

    Accepted: Nov. 5, 2024

    Published Online: Mar. 14, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03958

    Topics