Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 6, 0628004(2022)

Effect of Cloud Droplet Spectrum Distribution on Retrievals of Water Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius by AGRI Onboard FY-4A Satellite

Jinhan Yuan1,2, Yongbo Zhou1,2, Yubao Liu1,2、*, Jing Duan3, and Xin Wang4
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China;
  • 2Precision Regional Earth Modeling and Information Center, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China;
  • 3CMA Weather Modification Center, Beijing 100081, China
  • 4National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Comparison of two cloud droplet spectral distributions n(r). (a) Log-normal spectral distribution of MODIS inversion algorithm; (b) modified Gamma spectral distribution of WRF NSSL-2mom parameterization scheme
    Spectral response function Fs(λ) of 2nd and 5th channels of FY4A/AGRI. (a) Spectral response function of 2nd channel, with wavelength range of 0.55--0.75 μm; (b) spectral response function of 5th channel, with wavelength range of 1.58--1.64 μm
    Comparison of phase functions of response function integral computed based on response functions of 2nd and 5th channels of FY-4A/AGRI. (a) Phase function of visible band calculated under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (b) phase function of short-wave near-infrared band under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (c) phase function of visible band under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (d) phase function of short-wave near-infrared band under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (e) difference of phase function of visible channel under two spectral distribution assumptions; (f) difference of phase function of short-wave near-infrared channel under two spectral distribution assumptions
    Comparison of single scattering albedo with respect to integral of response function computed based on response functions of 2nd and 5th channels of FY-4A/AGRI. (a) Single scattering albedo in visible band; (b) single scattering albedo in short-wave near-infrared band
    Variation of reflectance with τCOT and reff for 2nd channel (0.55--0.75 μm) and 5th channel (1.58--1.64 μm) of FY-4A/AGRI. (a) Calculated reflectance of visible band under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (b) calculated reflectance of short-wave near-infrared band under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (c) calculated reflectance of visible band under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (d) calculated reflectance of short-wave near-infrared band under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (e) reflectance difference of visible channel under two spectral distribution assumptions; (f) reflectivity difference of short-wave near-infrared channel under two spectral distribution assumptions
    Bi-channel reflectance look-up table of FY-4A/AGRI for water cloud. (a) Surface albedo is 0.07, SZA is 5°, VZA is 5°, and AZ is 10°; (b) surface albedo is 0.07, SZA is 20°, VZA is 30°, and AZ is 60°; (c) surface albedo is 0.13, SZA is 20°, VZA is 30°, and AZ is 60°; (d) surface albedo is 0.19, SZA is 20°, VZA is 30°, and AZ is 60°
    Disk scans and geolocation of FY-4A/AGRI at 07:00—07:15 on 20 August, 2020. (a) Reflectance at 0.65 μm; (b) reflectance at 1.61 μm; (c) SZA; (d) solar azimuth angle; (e) VZA; (f) satellite azimuth angle
    Comparison of FY-4A/AGRI cloud property retrievals under two cloud droplet spectral distribution assumptions, and observation time of FY-4A/AGRI is 07:00—07:15 on 20 August, 2020. (a) reff retrieved under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (b) reff retrieved under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (c) difference of retrieved reff under two spectral distribution assumptions; (d) τCOT retrieved under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (e) τCOT retrieved under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (f) difference of τCOT retrieved under two spectral distribution assumptions
    Probability density distributions of FY-4A/AGRI cloud property retrievals under two spectral distributions. (a) Probability density distribution of reff retrieved under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (b) probability density distribution of reff retrieved under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution; (c) probability density distribution of τCOT retrieved under assumption of log-normal spectral distribution; (d) probability density distribution of τCOT retrieved under assumption of modified Gamma spectral distribution
    • Table 1. Ranges and classification of parameters of look-up table

      View table

      Table 1. Ranges and classification of parameters of look-up table

      ParameterNumber of pointsGrid point value
      τCOT81[0, 80] equally spaced with increment of 1
      reff92, 4, 8, 12, 16, 22, 28, 32, 36 μm
      Surface albedo6[0.07, 0.22] equally spaced with increment of 0.03
      SZA15[0°, 70°] equally spaced with increment of 5°
      VZA15[0°, 70°] equally spaced with increment of 5°
      AZ19[0°, 180°] equally spaced with increment of 10°
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jinhan Yuan, Yongbo Zhou, Yubao Liu, Jing Duan, Xin Wang. Effect of Cloud Droplet Spectrum Distribution on Retrievals of Water Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius by AGRI Onboard FY-4A Satellite[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 0628004

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Oct. 21, 2021

    Accepted: Jan. 6, 2022

    Published Online: Mar. 8, 2022

    The Author Email: Liu Yubao (ybliu@nuist.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.0628004

    Topics